The Spending Paralysis Trap: Why Retirees With $2.4 Million Live Like They Have $400,000

Somewhere in America, there is a couple in their late sixties with $2.4 million in savings, no debt, two Social Security checks, and a weekly grocery budget they have not adjusted since 2019. They are not struggling. They are scared, and that fear is costing them nearly a million dollars in lived experience.

This scenario is far from hypothetical. Behavioral finance researchers, including Wade Pfau of Pfau Wealth Management and David Blanchett, formerly head of retirement research at Morningstar and now at PGIM DC Solutions, have both documented what is increasingly called the “underspending paradox.” The term describes a meaningful share of retirees who, despite holding substantial portfolios, spend far less than their assets can support and often leave wealth almost entirely intact throughout retirement.

Research from Morningstar and T. Rowe Price finds that roughly 25% of retirees with $1 million or more spend less than 3% of their portfolio annually, well below what even conservative financial planners would recommend. Morningstar’s latest analysis puts the safe starting withdrawal rate at 3.9% for a 90% probability of funds lasting 30 years. For a couple with $2.4 million, withdrawing 4% annually would generate around $96,000 per year in retirement income.

If that couple is spending $58,000, they are leaving $38,000 per year untouched. Stretched across a 22-year retirement, that gap represents roughly $880,000 in foregone travel, family support, and personal enjoyment, while the portfolio compounds toward an estate neither spouse may fully live to appreciate.

Why This Happens: The Spending Smile

The psychological drivers behind underspending are well understood, even when they are hard to overcome. Loss aversion makes drawing down a portfolio feel threatening, even when the math says otherwise. Complicating matters is the “retirement spending smile” phenomenon, first documented by Blanchett in his Morningstar paper “Estimating the True Cost of Retirement.” His research found that real, inflation-adjusted spending declines roughly 1% to 2% per year through most of retirement, with higher outlays in the early “go-go” years, a dip in the middle “slow-go” years, and a modest uptick in the final years driven by healthcare costs.

A 2025 study by Blanchett and Michael Finke, published in the Financial Planning Review, deepened this picture considerably. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study, they found that roughly 80% of lifetime income (Social Security, pensions, and annuities) gets spent, while only about half of wage income, capital income, and portfolio savings gets consumed. The findings also revealed that married 65-year-olds with meaningful assets withdraw just 2.1% per year from their retirement accounts, less than half the commonly cited 4% guideline. That asymmetry helps explain why retirees with portfolio wealth rather than pension income are the most prone to chronic underspending. An EBRI survey from 2024 sharpened the point further: 38% of retirees described themselves as having a “savings mindset,” and only 11% identified as spenders.

Longevity uncertainty amplifies the anxiety. A couple both aged 68 faces a meaningful probability that at least one spouse lives into their nineties, and no spreadsheet fully quiets that fear. Healthcare adds another layer of unpredictability, with long-term care costs difficult to forecast and potentially catastrophic in worst-case scenarios. The cumulative result is a retiree who accumulates with discipline for four decades and then treats the portfolio as untouchable even after the accumulation phase has ended.

Five Ways to Break the Pattern

Build a Dedicated Fun Budget

The most practical first step is creating a discretionary budget that is mentally separated from essential expenses. Research on mental accounting shows that retirees who explicitly earmark a fun budget of $15,000 to $25,000 annually spend it more freely than those who draw from a single undifferentiated pool. Permission to spend has to be built into the structure, not merely assumed.

Generate Yield with Strategic Options

Retirees can shift from an asset-depletion mindset to an income-generation mindset through conservative, rules-based strategies. A covered call or cash-secured put strategy on a portion of a $2.4 million portfolio can generate additional yield that covers discretionary spending goals without requiring the sale of core holdings. This approach turns market volatility into a source of cash flow, creating a psychological “spending floor” that bypasses the fear of a shrinking balance.

Use Partial Annuitization to Create a Spending Floor

Converting 20% to 30% of the portfolio into a single premium immediate annuity creates guaranteed lifetime income that cannot be outlived. Because that guaranteed floor is no longer at risk, the remaining portfolio can be spent more freely. J.P. Morgan’s 2026 Guide to Retirement underscores the point: households with higher guaranteed income spend up to 44% more in retirement than those who rely primarily on portfolio withdrawals. Pfau’s research consistently shows that annuitizing a baseline income layer reduces spending anxiety more effectively than probability analyses and Monte Carlo projections alone.

Direct IRA Dollars to Charity Through QCDs

Qualified charitable distributions allow retirees aged 70 and a half or older to send funds directly from an IRA to a qualified charity. The 2026 annual limit is $111,000 per individual (up from $108,000 in 2025), and each spouse in a married couple can contribute up to that amount from their own IRA. These distributions satisfy required minimum distribution obligations without the amount appearing in adjusted gross income, which reduces Medicare surcharges and can limit taxes on Social Security benefits. For retirees who feel more comfortable giving than spending, QCDs create a productive outlet for capital that would otherwise continue accumulating.

Make Lifetime Gifts to Family Now

The 2026 annual gift tax exclusion is $19,000 per recipient, or $38,000 for a married couple using gift-splitting. A couple can transfer $38,000 per child or grandchild each year without touching their lifetime exemption. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, permanently set the lifetime estate and gift tax exemption at $15 million per individual (up from $13.99 million in 2025), with the amount indexed for inflation going forward and no sunset provision. For a retiree motivated by family legacy, witnessing the impact of these gifts at 70 is often far more rewarding than leaving an inheritance at 90.

The Real Cost of Waiting

The underspending trap is not a failure of financial planning. It is a failure of permission, and the numbers make the cost concrete. A couple spending $58,000 per year on a $2.4 million portfolio is effectively choosing to bequeath wealth rather than live on it, often without consciously making that choice. The portfolio may well reach $4 million by the time the survivor passes. The question worth sitting with is whether that outcome was the goal, or whether it happened by default while a better retirement went unlived.

Editor’s note: This revision updates the JPMorgan guaranteed-income spending figure to 44% (from 42%), reflecting data in J.P. Morgan’s 2026 Guide to Retirement released in February 2026. It also adds the finding from Blanchett and Finke’s 2025 Financial Planning Review study that married 65-year-olds with meaningful assets withdraw just 2.1% annually from their retirement accounts, notes that the 2026 QCD limit of $111,000 is up from $108,000 in 2025, and clarifies that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act was signed July 4, 2025.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.