AIRR vs PAVE: Which US Infrastructure ETF Is the Better Buy?
Two ETFs chase the same US infrastructure boom, but their bets land in completely different corners of the market, and that gap has meant the difference between doubling your money and merely keeping pace.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (NASDAQ:AIRR) and the Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (NYSEARCA:PAVE) both pitch investors on the same story: US reshoring, factory buildouts, electrification, and a multi-year capex cycle. They look like substitutes, but they bet on different slices of the same theme. Over the past year, AIRR returned 62.89% while PAVE returned 36.66%, a gap that exists because these funds are betting on different parts of the same theme.
What each fund is actually betting on
AIRR is a concentrated wager on US small and mid-cap industrial execution. The portfolio holds 51 positions, with the top 10 representing roughly 37.5% of assets. The biggest names are the companies that physically build the infrastructure: Argan at 4.89%, MasTec at 4.65%, Comfort Systems at 4.18%, and Sterling Infrastructure at 3.96%. It also carries a meaningful sleeve of regional banks (FNB, Old National, Wintrust, Associated, Fulton, First Financial), which makes the fund implicitly long a steeper yield curve and local commercial lending demand.
PAVE plays the same theme from one rung up the value chain. It holds 119 equity positions with net assets of $12.4 billion, and its top holdings are large-cap industrial blue chips: Deere at 3.39%, Howmet at 3.39%, Quanta Services at 3.37%, Trane Technologies at 3.33%, CSX at 3.35%, Union Pacific at 3.22%, and Eaton at 3.16%. Railroads, building materials (Vulcan, Martin Marietta, CRH), and machinery dominate. PAVE wins when the broader industrial complex re-rates. AIRR wins when small-cap contractors and electrical/mechanical specialists capture the actual project spend.
Where the difference shows up
The divergence is in the numbers. Year to date, AIRR is up 32.79% versus PAVE at 22.22%, with the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) up just 7.53%. Over five years, AIRR has returned 218.72% against PAVE's 134.10% and the S&P's 71.88%. AIRR's smaller-cap tilt has paid handsomely as data center buildouts and grid upgrades have flowed directly into the contractors' backlogs. The flip side: AIRR's concentration and small-cap beta mean it will fall harder if industrial capex stalls or credit conditions tighten on its regional banks.
Practical comparison
| Factor | AIRR | PAVE |
|---|---|---|
| Net assets | $8.4B | $12.4B |
| Holdings | 51 | 120 |
| Market-cap tilt | Small/mid-cap | Large/mid-cap |
| Top 10 concentration | ~37.5% | ~31.5% |
| Largest position | Argan (4.89%) | Deere (3.39%) |
| 1-year return | 62.89% | 36.66% |
| 5-year return | 218.72% | 134.10% |
PAVE also carries international exposure through CRH, Eaton, Trane, and Amrize, which dilutes the pure-play US thesis somewhat. AIRR is entirely domestic by design.
The verdict
For an investor whose actual thesis is US reshoring and the boots-on-the-ground capex cycle, AIRR is the cleaner expression. It holds the contractors, electrical specialists, and HVAC installers booking the work, with small-cap leverage and a regional-bank sleeve that compounds the bet. PAVE is the better choice for investors who want infrastructure exposure with lower drawdown risk, broader diversification across 120 names, and large-cap liquidity, accepting that returns will track a more index-like outcome. What would flip the call: a small-cap credit shock or a sharp slowdown in non-residential construction would punish AIRR first and hardest. PAVE's railroads and building-materials majors would absorb that hit with far more cushion.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
After 15 years on Wall Street with 7 of them as Director of Corporate and Municipal Bond Trading for a NYSE member firm, I started my own project and corporate finance consultancy. Much of the work involves writing business plans, presentations, white papers and marketing materials for companies seeking budgetary allocations for spinoffs and new initiatives or for raising capital for expansion or startup companies and entrepreneurs. On financial topics, I have been published under my own byline at The Motley Fool, 247wallst.com, DealFlow Events’ Healthcare Services Investment Newsletter and The Microcap Newsletter, among others. Additionally, I have done freelance ghostwriting writing and editing for several financial websites, such as Seeking Alpha and Shmoop Financial. I have also written and been published on a variety of other topics from music, audiophile sound and film to musical instrument history, martial arts, and current events. Publications include Copper Magazine, Fidelity (Germany), Blasting News, Inside Kung-Fu, and other periodicals.
