Artificial intelligence has become the technology industry’s biggest customer, and that shift is changing far more than data centers. Every new AI server requires enormous amounts of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and advanced DRAM, leaving chipmakers racing to expand production. Yet new factories take years to build, not months. The result is a supply squeeze that is spreading beyond AI infrastructure and into everyday electronics.
For investors, the important question is no longer whether memory prices will rise, but which companies can handle the pressure better than everyone else. Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL | AAPL Price Prediction) sits squarely in that debate.
AI Is Winning the Battle for Memory
Appearing on WisdomTree’s The Next Big Thing podcast, SemiAnalysis founder Dylan Patel argued that many investors underestimate how severe the memory shortage could become. According to Patel, memory manufacturers are expanding production capacity by roughly 20% to 30% annually, while demand tied to AI is doubling every year. That math simply doesn’t work.
His conclusion was straightforward: memory prices are likely to keep climbing because supply cannot catch demand.
Patel also warned that AI customers will increasingly outbid consumer electronics companies for available memory. If that happens, smartphones, laptops, and tablets may become less attractive customers for suppliers, with capacity redirected toward AI accelerators that generate much higher profits.
To put that into perspective, if memory becomes the limiting factor, consumer electronics companies won’t just pay more — they may receive fewer chips regardless of price.
Apple Has More Advantages Than Most Rivals
For Apple, the picture is mixed but far from disastrous. The company enters this cycle with several advantages that many Android manufacturers lack.
Apple has reportedly secured priority memory allocation through long-term supplier agreements and has even paid premiums to lock in LPDDR supply. Counterpoint Research has also noted that Apple and Samsung are among the companies best positioned to navigate the shortage.
The company also has another advantage many competitors lack: services, which continues generating record revenue with margins well above hardware, reducing the company’s dependence on iPhone profits alone.
That said, higher costs are already appearing. Apple acknowledged during its fiscal second-quarter 2026 earnings report that memory costs increased during the June quarter and are expected to create additional pressure going forward. Industry estimates cited by Patel suggest memory costs for premium smartphones could rise from roughly $50 per device to more than $150 if pricing continues climbing.
Apple has already raised prices on certain Mac and iPad models, with increases reaching $300 on some configurations. Tim Cook has also indicated that higher prices are becoming unavoidable under current market conditions.
The Bull Case Still Carries More Weight
The bear case isn’t difficult to understand. Higher component costs could compress margins. More expensive iPhones could slow upgrade cycles. Global smartphone shipments are already expected to soften, particularly in lower-priced segments.
Those are legitimate concerns. Ironically, though, the same forces hurting the broader smartphone market may strengthen Apple’s competitive position.
Consumers purchasing premium devices are generally less sensitive to moderate price increases. Meanwhile, lower-margin competitors have fewer options when memory costs surge. They either accept lower profits or lose customers by raising prices.
Apple also continues returning tens of billions of dollars to shareholders through buybacks while generating enormous free cash flow, giving management flexibility that many rivals simply don’t have.
Granted, Apple trades at a premium valuation, meaning any sustained pressure on gross margins could create periods of stock volatility.
Key Takeaway
In short, Patel’s warning deserves attention because it highlights an industrywide imbalance that may persist for years rather than quarters. AI’s appetite for memory appears poised to outgrow manufacturing capacity, pushing costs higher across consumer electronics.
For Apple, that creates near-term headwinds through higher component costs and potentially slower hardware sales. Yet the bullish case remains stronger. Apple’s premium brand, pricing power, supply chain scale, and rapidly growing services business make it one of the best-equipped consumer electronics companies to weather a prolonged memory shortage.
Ultimately, if AI forces weaker hardware makers to retreat while Apple preserves margins and market share, today’s memory crunch could become less of a threat and more of a competitive advantage for long-term shareholders.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.