On the July 16 episode of The Investing for Beginners Podcast, co-host Stephen Morris drew a hard line around AI stocks, arguing investors should stay away from anything the government will regulate. His logic borrows from a 1950 Barron’s checklist written by T. Rowe Price, which warned investors away from companies furnishing necessities of life because socialistic pressure would cap profits. Morris thinks AI is one triggering event away from that same fate.
The bet is that regulators will eventually decide how fast AI can move, even as the technology itself keeps accelerating. Prediction markets already reflect the risk. Polymarket traders currently price the odds that the US government will remove public access to another major AI model in 2026 at 27.5%, with a separate market on a Chinese model restriction sitting at 21.5%. The Commerce Department already temporarily pulled access to Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models in June 2026 before reversing course.
The 1950 Checklist, Applied to 2026
T. Rowe Price’s framework required a return on invested capital of 8% or higher without long-term decline, and pretax profit margins of 6% for high-turnover retailers, scaling to 10% to 15% for low-turnover, premium-priced companies. Co-host Andrew Sather noted that today’s growth investors routinely celebrate companies posting negative ROIC, contradicting T. Rowe Price’s rulebook.
NVIDIA: The Regulatory Bullseye
NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction) is the poster child for this tension. The company generated a 65.6% operating margin, a 63% net profit margin, and a 114.3% return on equity over the trailing twelve months. NVIDIA reported Q1 FY27 revenue of $81.61 billion, up 85% year over year. Shares trade at roughly 31 times trailing earnings and 20 times sales, giving the company a market capitalization of approximately $5.15 trillion. Meanwhile, U.S. export restrictions on advanced chips to China remain a headwind: NVIDIA’s Q2 FY27 revenue outlook of $91 billion assumes no China data-center compute revenue.
C3.ai: What Happens When the Checklist Wins
C3.ai (NYSE: AI) is the counterexample. The company reported Q4 FY26 revenue of $51.6 million, down 52.5% year over year, while profitability metrics remain deeply negative. Founder Thomas Siebel returned as CEO amid a major sales and operational reset. The stock has suffered a major decline over the past year, reflecting investor concerns about growth, margins, and execution. Every 1950s screen flags this stock.
Microsoft: The Compromise Candidate
Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) sits between the two extremes. Q3 FY26 revenue grew 18%, Azure and other cloud services grew 40%, and the AI business surpassed a $37 billion annual revenue run rate, up 123% year over year. Operating margin of roughly 46% and ROE of 34% satisfy Price’s profitability criteria. Shares have declined 21.16% over the past year despite strong operating performance, as investors reassess the scale of AI infrastructure spending, including roughly $30.9 billion in quarterly cash PP&E investments, and demand clearer evidence of returns on capital.
Procter & Gamble: The Checklist’s Comfort Zone
Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG) is what T. Rowe Price would call a growth stock that behaves. It’s the kind of mature growth-and-income stock investors often seek: defensive, profitable, and consistent. The consumer staples giant carries a roughly 19% net margin, strong return on equity, and historically low volatility. It has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years and has paid uninterrupted dividends since 1890. In Q3 FY26, P&G reported net sales of approximately $21.2 billion, up 7% year over year, with organic sales growth across all five business segments. The shares trade around 21 times trailing earnings and have delivered little price movement over the past year.
What to Watch
Morris’s thesis rests on whether Washington’s triggering event arrives before AI capex cycles pay off. NVIDIA’s forward P/E of 23 reflects expectations that regulators remain hands-off. Microsoft’s forward P/E of 20 reflects expectations that cloud AI demand outpaces political friction. C3.ai’s FY27 revenue guidance of $210 million to $240 million depends on the business bottoming before cash runs low. A 1950s checklist cannot answer these questions, but it can reveal which outcome you are actually betting on.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.