I Can’t Stop Buying Alphabet Because The AI Talent Narrative is Wrong

Every headline says Google is hemorrhaging its best AI minds to Anthropic and OpenAI, and that narrative has created one of the most exploitable gaps between fear and reality in the market right now.

Published July 19, 2026, 12:12pm ET · 3 min read

A bronze bull figurine stands on the left, looking upwards and to the right. To its right, a tall stack of silver coins is positioned. On the far right, a silver bear figurine stands, looking towards the left. All figures are set against a plain white background.
The iconic bull and bear market symbols face off across a stack of coins, representing the ongoing tug-of-war in financial markets and the strategic appeal of safe haven investments like gold. © Vladimir Endovitskiy / Shutterstock.com

I keep hitting the buy button on Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL | GOOGL Price Prediction) because the loudest bearish story attached to it, the idea that Google is bleeding AI talent to Anthropic and OpenAI, does not match anything I see in the numbers or the org chart. It is the cleanest gap between narrative and reality I have found in my portfolio, and I am using it.

The Thesis Behind Every Add

My conviction rests on two structural facts the brain drain story ignores. First, the merger of Google Brain and DeepMind under Demis Hassabis created the densest concentration of world-class AI PhDs on the planet, operating as one coordinated scientific unit rather than warring internal teams. Second, Google has finalized multi-billion-dollar retention packages that match startup equity while giving researchers access to internal TPU clusters that startups physically cannot replicate. If you want to train a frontier model without hitting a compute wall, Google is the destination. A handful of high-profile departures does not change that math.

The Receipts

The financial evidence backs the org chart. Q1 2026 revenue landed at $109.90 billion, up 21.8% year over year, with EPS of $5.11 against a $2.63 estimate. That was the fourth consecutive EPS beat.

Google Cloud grew 63% year over year to $20.03 billion, and the backlog nearly doubled quarter over quarter to over $460 billion. Gemini is processing 16 billion tokens per minute via direct API, up 60% from the prior quarter. Companies losing their best researchers do not ship product at that velocity. Sundar Pichai put it plainly on the Q1 call: “The fact that we own frontier models and own the silicon really helps us stay ahead of the curve.”

The dividend, initiated in 2024, was raised 5% to $0.22 per share in April. The direction of travel matters for a long-term holder, even if the yield is modest today.

Why Not the Obvious Alternatives

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is the reflexive AI pick, and I own some. I keep adding to Alphabet instead because Google Cloud grew 63% against a mature AWS at Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN), and Alphabet also owns the Search and YouTube advertising engine that generated $77.25 billion in Google advertising revenue in Q1 2026. Meta (NASDAQ:META) is a cleaner ad play, but it lacks the cloud, the subscription base of 350 million paid users, and Waymo, which surpassed 500,000 fully autonomous rides per week. At a P/E of 28, I am not paying a premium for that optionality.

The Risk I Actually Respect

Capital expenditure. 2026 CapEx guidance sits at $175 to $185 billion, up from $91.45 billion in 2025. Free cash flow already fell to $10.12 billion in Q1 2026, down 46.63% year over year. If the ROI on that spend disappoints, the story gets ugly. What holds my thesis together is the demand signal underneath it: a $460 billion backlog and cloud operating income that tripled year over year to $6.6 billion. Capacity is booked before it is built.

Why the Buy Button Stays Active

Warren Buffett confirmed he initiated Berkshire’s Alphabet stake and expressed regret for not investing sooner. I understand the sentiment. As long as Alphabet owns the models, the silicon, the researchers, and the distribution, I keep buying, and the brain drain headlines keep making my cost basis better.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Alex Sirois

Alex Sirois is a financial writer with experience spanning both retail and institutional investing. He has written for InvestorPlace and held roles at BNY Mellon and Bernstein, giving him a perspective that bridges Main Street portfolios and Wall Street analysis.

Alex holds an MBA from George Washington University and has built his career across multiple industries, including e-commerce, education, and translation — a breadth of experience that informs how he breaks down complex financial topics for everyday investors. His writing is conversational, actionable, and grounded in long-term, buy-and-hold investing principles.

At 247 Wall St., Alex focuses on delivering analysis that is both accessible and useful, with a clear emphasis on helping readers make more informed decisions with their money.

All articles →