Washington Just Committed $17.5 Billion to New Reactors. Uranium Funds Missed the Memo
Washington just directed $17.5 billion toward the nuclear supply chain, yet the ETFs most investors hold to capture that trade are quietly delivering something else entirely.
The Department of Energy’s $17.5 billion loan commitment backing 10 new Westinghouse reactors and the domestic uranium supply chain should have been a green light for the two ETFs most retail investors use to play the nuclear renaissance. Both funds have lagged. The Global X Uranium ETF (NYSEARCA:URA) is down 0.56% year to date, and the VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NYSEARCA:NLR) is down 8.31%. For investors who bought URA or NLR specifically to own the reactor buildout, the gap between the policy tailwind and the fund performance is worth understanding before adding more.
Why Investors Own URA and NLR
The largest and most liquid uranium ETF is URA, with roughly $7.81 billion in net assets as of April 30, 2026, and an expense ratio of 0.69%. It offers one ticker access to miners, converters, and reactor-adjacent industrial names. NLR takes a broader view, blending uranium miners with nuclear utilities and equipment manufacturers, while offering a 2.77% dividend yield and a 0.52% expense ratio. Both funds are legitimate ways to own the theme. The problem is what “the theme” actually means when Washington is specifically funding the supply chain.
Where the Incumbents Fall Short
The DOE program rewards the pieces that build and fuel reactors: miners, enrichers, fuel fabricators, and Westinghouse’s construction pipeline. NLR’s largest holding is Constellation Energy at 9.62%, a nuclear power producer whose earnings track wholesale electricity prices more closely than uranium spot or reactor orders. That utility ballast is why NLR trailed even in a strong policy year: it is a nuclear ETF, but only partly a supply-chain ETF.
Closer to the supply chain is URA, though it comes with concentration risk. Cameco alone accounts for 22.18% of the fund, with the next-largest positions well below that weight. And despite the recent drift lower, more than $850 million has flowed into URA, which means retail is buying the dip in a vehicle that is essentially half a bet on one Canadian producer.
The Cleaner Play: Sprott Uranium Miners
The Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (NYSEARCA:URNM) is the more direct expression of what the DOE is actually funding. The fund holds 82.37% in uranium and related equities and 17.63% in physical uranium through the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, giving it both operating leverage to miners and direct commodity exposure. That physical sleeve is the mechanism: as utilities and DOE-backed programs contract for pounds, spot and term uranium prices feed straight into net asset value without waiting for a miner’s next quarterly report.
The exposure has been rewarded. URNM is up 15.5% over the past year, ahead of URA’s 12.84% and NLR’s 0.25%. Over five years, URNM has returned 113.07%. Concentration is still real: Cameco is 20.69%, and NexGen Energy is 12.65%, similar to URA. The differences are the physical uranium holding and the absence of utility and diversified industrial names that dilute the trade.
The Real Tradeoffs
At 0.75%, URNM costs 6 basis points more than URA and 23 basis points more than NLR. The asset base is smaller at $2.1 billion, and the fund tends to be more volatile because it lacks the utility dampener that softens the other funds. It is also down 5.45% year-to-date, so the recent policy news has not spared it either. What URNM does offer is a purer transmission line from the DOE spending narrative to fund returns, with uranium volatility still fully present in the equation.
How to Approach the Switch
In a taxable account, an outright swap out of URA or NLR could realize capital gains, especially given URA’s 167.42% five-year return. A partial reallocation, or directing new contributions into URNM, sidesteps that. In a tax-advantaged account, the mechanics are simpler. Investors who value NLR’s utility income may consider retaining a partial position in NLR while researching URNM for supply-chain exposure.
What to Watch From Here
The DOE commitment is a multi-year story, and the incumbents remain functional vehicles. URA remains defensible for investors seeking broad, liquid exposure with Cameco as an anchor. NLR still fits an income-oriented holder comfortable with utility exposure. URNM is the option to evaluate for investors whose original thesis was the supply chain itself, and whose current holding is quietly delivering something else.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.
