The Most Famous Fund Manager’s Fund Charges You 0.74%. The 401(k) Version Charges 0.45%

Photo of Ryne Mauck
By Ryne Mauck Published

Quick Read

  • Contrafund investors may be paying more for the same active strategy. FCNTX charges 0.74%, while the FLCNX K6 share class offers Will Danoff's same portfolio and strategy for 0.45% to investors with access through eligible workplace plans.

  • If FLCNX is available in your 401(k), the 29-basis-point savings can add up. A $100,000 Contrafund position would save roughly $290 annually in fund expenses while retaining exposure to Danoff's active management.

  • SCHG offers a much cheaper alternative for investors without K6 access. Its 0.04% expense ratio and overlapping large-cap growth exposure come with stronger 10-year historical returns, although investors give up Danoff's concentrated, off-benchmark stock picks.

  • Act now: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks — and FCNTX didn't make the cut. Grab the names FREE today.

The Most Famous Fund Manager’s Fund Charges You 0.74%. The 401(k) Version Charges 0.45%

© Ilyas nasrulloh / Shutterstock.com

Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) is the fund that made Will Danoff a household name in active management. For four decades, the flagship large-cap growth vehicle has drawn retail money on the strength of one manager’s record, and it now holds roughly $180 billion in net assets. If you own FCNTX in a taxable Fidelity account or a rollover IRA, you own it for a specific reason: exposure to Danoff’s concentrated bets on names like Advanced Micro Devices, Airbnb, and Align Technology. While that case for owning the fund is fair, what is less fair is what you pay for it. FCNTX’s retail share class carries a 0.74% expense ratio, while the exact same portfolio — run by the same manager — sits inside a cheaper share class that most retail holders cannot buy directly.

A Share Class Nobody Talks About

The cheaper version is the K6 share class, ticker FLCNX, and it charges 0.45%. What you get is the same manager, the same holdings, and the same strategy. The K6 top-ten reads nearly identically to the retail fund: 16.9% weight in Advanced Micro Devices, 23.0% in Align Technology, 5.7% in Agnico Eagle Mines, matching FCNTX to within basis points. That said, the gap is structural. K6 shares are reserved for large employer-sponsored retirement plans, and the fund holds about $37.5 billion in assets almost entirely sourced from workplace 401(k) menus.

Performance confirms the fee gap flows through to results. Over the last year, FCNTX returned 17.88% while FLCNX returned 16.89%, a rounding-error split driven by daily NAV timing rather than strategy. Over five years, FLCNX actually edges ahead at 91.21% versus 89.13% for FCNTX. The takeaway is that the lower fee compounds.

Step One: Check Your 401(k) Menu

Before you consider any fund swap, check whether your employer’s plan offers FLCNX. Fidelity is the recordkeeper for 26,200 corporate defined contribution plans covering 24.8 million participants, and Contrafund K6 is a common lineup option on those menus. If it is on yours, moving your Contrafund allocation from the retail IRA into the 401(k) K6 sleeve buys you the same portfolio for 29 basis points less in annual drag. On a $100,000 position, that is roughly $290 a year retained inside the fund, compounding for as long as you hold.

If You Cannot Get K6, Consider SCHG

Most retail Contrafund holders cannot access FLCNX. For them, a good substitute would be the Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (NYSEARCA:SCHG), a passive large-cap growth ETF with roughly $61 billion in net assets and a published expense ratio of 0.04%. The exposures overlap heavily with what Danoff actually owns. SCHG’s largest positions include NVIDIA at 11.01%, Apple at 9.83%, Microsoft at 7.17%, and Advanced Micro Devices at 2.93%, the same mega-cap growth names that drive much of the Contrafund’s returns.

It is worth acknowledging the historical edge. Over ten years, SCHG returned 445.01% versus 388.60% for FCNTX. Contrafund has trailed the passive large-cap growth index over the full decade despite Danoff’s reputation, and the fee gap of roughly 70 basis points explains a meaningful chunk of that shortfall. Year to date, Contrafund is ahead at 10.44% versus 8.11% for SCHG, a reminder that active picks can win in any given year. Over long holding periods, though, the fee differential is doing a lot of the heavy lifting.

What You Give Up

SCHG is not a Contrafund clone. You lose Danoff’s concentrated off-benchmark bets, the small biotech positions like Spyre Therapeutics and Alnylam, and the gold-miner exposure through Agnico Eagle. You also change tax treatment. Selling FCNTX in a taxable account can trigger capital gains, and Contrafund itself has historically distributed sizeable year-end gains that SCHG’s ETF structure largely avoids. If your Contrafund shares sit inside an IRA, the swap is friction-free. In a taxable account, run the tax math before selling.

Where This Leaves You

If you want Danoff’s active management, the cheapest legal path is FLCNX inside a 401(k) that offers it. If your plan does not, SCHG delivers the same mega-cap growth exposure at one-eighteenth the retail Contrafund fee, with a decade of stronger total returns to back it up. Paying 0.74% for a portfolio you can approximate for 0.04% is a choice worth reexamining.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Ryne Mauck
About the Author Ryne Mauck →

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer specializing in ETFs, retirement investing, and investment strategy.

Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide readers with clear, research-driven insights into valuation, fundamentals, portfolio construction, and risk management. His goal is to help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a disciplined long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MRNA Vol: 50,031,480
SMCI Vol: 48,162,040
CDW
CDW Vol: 1,764,149
CDNS Vol: 2,984,743
AMD
AMD Vol: 18,989,751

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
ALB Vol: 2,271,433
Dow
DOW Vol: 9,177,699
LYB Vol: 3,662,044
ERIE Vol: 217,793