The CLARITY Act Died on Tuesday. By Friday the SEC and CFTC Had Written Three Rules. What Changed for XRP, Bitcoin, and Solana?

The Senate refused to end debate on the CLARITY Act on September 15, 2026, with 49 senators voting yes and 50 voting no, eleven short of the sixty needed. Two days later, the SEC and CFTC each published a document the industry had been asking Congress for.

Most coverage read that as Washington moving fast. It was the opposite. Both agencies had written their rules months earlier and were waiting for the Senate to finish. So the question for anyone holding XRP (CRYPTO:XRP), Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) or Solana (CRYPTO:SOL) is whether agency paperwork can do the job a statute was supposed to do.

The Rules Were Written Before the Vote

Atkins went on CNBC’s Squawk Box on December 2, 2025, and promised the Innovation Exemption within weeks. “We have enough authority to drive forward,” he said. “I’m looking forward to having an innovation exemption, we’ll be able to get that out in a month or so.” He expected it to be live before the end of January and called it his top priority for the year.

It arrived nine months late. JPMorgan, Citadel and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association met the SEC’s crypto task force to argue against the carve-outs, and Atkins softened his language afterward. Asked directly whether the SEC would now wait for Congress to pass the bill, he answered that it would not necessarily wait.

Michael Selig set his own trigger in public. At the CFTC’s Innovation Advisory Committee on August 20, he said he would give the CLARITY Act its breathing room for a vote, then warned that if a bipartisan product failed, he would direct staff to move swiftly and propose the rules himself. The Senate met that condition on September 15.

So the two documents published on September 17 were finished work. Atkins said as much in his own statement, opening with the line that Congress was unsuccessful in advancing the CLARITY Act despite the tireless efforts of many, and then describing what the SEC would do instead.

What Changed for Each Coin?

The two agencies delivered something specific to Solana, something general to Bitcoin, and close to nothing new for XRP.

Solana gained the most. The Innovation Exemption grants five-year conditional relief, letting Tokenized Securities Venues trade tokenized shares without registering as exchanges, using permissioned automated market makers. Solana already carries $465 million of tokenized stocks, the largest book of any chain. The CFTC’s letter extends a framework the agency first gave to Phantom Technologies, a wallet built for the Solana ecosystem. The SEC had also named SOL a core ETF asset on September 5.

Bitcoin gained the general benefit of two regulators writing rules again, and nothing Bitcoin-specific. Its status has not been in serious dispute for years, so an exemption covering tokenized equities and a safe harbor for token offerings do not touch it.

XRP gained nothing new, and its own history explains why. Its commodity status already comes from the joint SEC and CFTC interpretation of March 17, and no fresh rule can turn an interpretation into a statute. The Congressional Research Service has flagged that the same interpretation leaves the CFTC’s authority over digital commodity spot markets unsettled, and closing that gap needs an act of Congress.

Why Three Rules Are Not a Law

Atkins put the limit in his own announcement. “Though temporary, the Innovation Exemption is a principled, structured grant of relief,” he wrote, and he told reporters the SEC was not cementing today’s technology as the standard for tomorrow. The chairman who signed the relief led with the word temporary.

Each document ends in a different way. The Innovation Exemption runs five years, and a future chair can decline to renew it. The CFTC’s letter is a staff no-action position, meaning staff will not recommend enforcement while it stands, and it expires whenever the Commission writes a formal rule. Regulation Crypto Assets, proposed on August 18, is still a proposal, with comments open until October 20.

Selig also signed his letter alone. He holds the only filled seat on a five-member commission, with four vacant, including both reserved for the minority party, so one commissioner was relieved that a full commission could eventually narrow or withdraw.

JPMorgan called the agency framework less durable than legislation because rules can be changed or challenged in court, and Bernstein described the CLARITY Act as a foolproof shield against future political shifts. Both chairs have said the same thing, and Atkins has called agency rulemaking a head start on legislation, not a replacement.

Do the Agencies Replace What the Senate Refused?

On coverage, the agencies came close. Solana holders got a regulated venue for tokenized stocks and a workable framework for wallet software, Bitcoin holders got a functioning regulator, and XRP holders got confirmation that neither agency plans to reopen the commodity question. An industry that spent Tuesday night assuming it had lost a year got most of that year back by Thursday afternoon.

On durability, they did not come close, and the documents say so. Each one carries an off-switch written in by the lawyers who drafted the relief, and a staff letter lasts until staff changes its mind. The cost of accepting agency rules instead of a statute is that the industry has to win the argument again with every new administration, and the next time it asks the Senate, it starts from 49 votes.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.