Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs Lost $391 Million in a Day. Only XRP ETFs Took Money In.

When Bitcoin ETFs and Ethereum ETFs both bled hundreds of millions in a single session, one unlikely crypto fund quietly moved in the opposite direction, raising a question investors cannot easily dismiss.

By Sam Daodu
Published October 15, 2026, 10:18am ET · 4 min read

The Crypto Desk desk. Editor: Sam Daodu.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Two golden cryptocurrency coins, one representing XRP on the left and one representing Bitcoin on the right, stand upright on a dark, rustic wooden surface. The background is a blurred, dark space, emphasizing the coins in the foreground. Both coins feature their respective symbols prominently.
Physical representations of Bitcoin and XRP, two cryptocurrencies with significantly different ETF investment outcomes as of Tuesday, October 13, 2026. © SashaMagic / Shutterstock.com

Investors withdrew a significant $391 million from Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) and Ethereum (CRYPTO:ETH) exchange-traded funds (ETFs), according to SoSoValue. Bitcoin ETFs lost $261.46 million, while Ethereum ETFs saw outflows of $129.51 million. In contrast, XRP (CRYPTO:XRP) funds experienced a positive shift, with XRP ETF inflows reaching $740,414, making it the only fund group among the four major cryptocurrencies to see any inflow.

This marks a reversal from the previous day, when Bitcoin ETFs recorded their second-largest inflow of the month on October 13, while XRP funds saw zero activity. This fueled speculation that funds were shifting from XRP to Bitcoin. What does this one-day opposite pattern indicate?

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana Funds Saw Outflows While XRP Funds Took In $740,414

Crypto Coins Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple close-up on 100 American Dollars bank notes. Business cryptocurrency background.

Andrey Gorgots / Shutterstock.com

Bitcoin’s $261.46 million outflow was the second-highest of October, following the October 7 session. It completely negated the $175.62 million that had come into Bitcoin funds on October 13. Nevertheless, Bitcoin funds still hold a substantial $104.83 billion in net assets.

Ethereum funds also faced a setback, shedding $129.51 million the same day, adding to selling pressure on the two largest cryptocurrencies. Meanwhile, Solana (CRYPTO:SOL) funds fell slightly, shedding $1.29 million. Although small, this marks the ninth out of ten October sessions in which Solana funds have faced outflows, highlighting an ongoing trend.

Meanwhile, XRP funds recorded an inflow for the first time after three consecutive sessions with no activity. A fund records a flow when large brokers create new fund shares by depositing cash, or redeem shares for cash. For three sessions, these brokers were inactive, making the $740,414 inflow a notable shift, as it indicates a change from inactivity to some movement.

XRP’s $740,414 Inflow Is Minor Compared to Bitcoin’s $261 Million Outflow

BTC Bitcoin and XRP Ripple Coins Between Casino Chips. Entertainment and Modern Blockchain Payments Concept.

Virrage Images / Shutterstock.com

Despite the positive inflow, the amount that entered XRP funds is a mere fraction of what left Bitcoin funds that same day—less than 0.3%. Therefore, treating these two events as comparable would not be accurate.

Each fund’s figures must be viewed independently. While Bitcoin funds are experiencing outflows, XRP funds have recorded inflows, yet there’s no evidence suggesting that investors are necessarily switching from Bitcoin to XRP. One creation of new XRP fund shares does not guarantee that these buyers will return for subsequent sessions.

To date, XRP funds have attracted $1.80 billion since launch, reflecting net cash invested by investors. However, their current net assets stand at $1.51 billion, approximately 16.3% less than the total invested amount. This means XRP fund holders are currently at an average loss.

One Session Suggested Rotation Into Bitcoin, and the Next Suggested the Reverse

A large, golden Bitcoin coin is centered against a dark blue background with digital financial charts. Green and red candlestick bars and blue and pink line graphs are visible, along with numeric data. Bright light and sparks emanate from the Bitcoin symbol, with electric blue lightning bolts crossing the background, creating a dynamic and energetic visual.

Morrowind / Shutterstock.com

On October 13, Bitcoin funds saw positive inflows while XRP funds remained stagnant, suggesting a rotation of investor funds. The following day, however, the trend flipped, with Bitcoin funds losing money while XRP funds posted the only inflow. This shift raises questions about investor sentiment, but both interpretations can’t be correct at the same time.

This contradiction emphasizes the unpredictability of daily flows. A single day’s data may reflect actions from a single large investor reallocating assets or trivial market noise.

A more reliable indicator would require observing the same trend across consecutive days. Solana’s nine negative sessions out of ten in October illustrate this point, while XRP’s single positive session does not provide similar confidence. The recent inflow could signal renewed interest or be an isolated event that may not repeat. A single inflow of $740,414 does not provide enough evidence to conclude that demand is steadily increasing.

Are XRP ETF Inflows a Sign of Renewed Demand?

Currently, XRP fund demand appears largely unchanged compared to the period before October 14, but the inactivity has changed; there’s no longer a flat line. A minor inflow following three sessions of inactivity does not constitute a trend. Bitcoin funds show the same volatility, swinging from a $175.62 million inflow to a $261.46 million outflow in back-to-back sessions.

For XRP funds to show sustained demand, they would need inflows over at least three consecutive sessions, matching the three-session inactivity period they recently ended. Furthermore, if net assets were to increase by about 19.5%, approaching the $1.80 billion cumulative inflow, holders could potentially break even. Until both conditions are met, the October 14 inflow should be viewed as a market pulse, with subsequent data from SoSoValue likely confirming or reversing this reading.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

1INVESTMENTS ARE NOT FDIC INSURED • ARE NOT BANK GUARANTEED • MAY LOSE VALUE

Brokerage and Active investing products offered through SoFi Securities LLC, member FINRA(www.finra.org)/SIPC(www.sipc.org).2The probability of a member receiving $3,000 is 0.028%. If you don’t make a selection in 45 days, you’ll no longer qualify for the promo. Members must fund their account with a minimum of $50.00 to qualify. The probability percentage is subject to decrease. Members are only eligible for the Stock Award promotion upon opening their first brokerage account; subsequent cash brokerage accounts are ineligible for the promo, including for members with multiple accounts.

3Other fees, such as exchange fees, may apply. Please view our fee disclosure to view a full listing of fees.

4There are limitations with fractional shares to consider before investing. During market hours fractional share orders are transmitted immediately in the order received. There may be system delays from receipt of your order until execution and market conditions may adversely impact execution prices. Outside of market hours orders are received on a not held basis and will be aggregated for each security then executed in the morning trade window of the next business day at market open. Share will be delivered at an average price received for executing the securities through a single batched order. Fractional shares may not be transferred to another firm. Fractional shares will be sold when a transfer or closure request is initiated. Please consider that selling securities is a taxable event.
Sam Daodu

Sam Daodu is a crypto analyst who's spent nearly a decade making blockchain understandable—no easy task when most whitepapers read like fever dreams. He writes for 24/7 Wall St., covering Bitcoin, altcoins, and crypto market analysis for investors. Before crypto, he was a tech writer (back when explaining "the cloud" was peak innovation). Since 2018, he's written for CoinTelegraph, Yahoo Finance, The Block, Cryptonews, Zypto, Rain, and more—basically anywhere people want crypto news without the headache. Sam runs MacLabs Marketing, a content agency for crypto brands tired of sounding like AI wrote their website. He also publishes free crypto education on his site for Web3 enthusiasts who think "gas fees" is a typo. When he's not writing or staring at charts, Sam's either: - Watching anime (currently convinced One Piece has better tokenomics than most altcoins) - At the gym sculpting himself into a Greek god - Listening to the music your mum warned you only bad boys listen to Connect: LinkedIn | Email | MacLabs Marketing

All articles →