Platinum and Palladium Have Been Left Behind in the Precious Metals Rally and These 3 ETFs Could Be the Next Catch Up Trade

Gold and silver stole the precious metals story over the past year. Platinum and palladium sat it out. That gap sets up the choice between three physically-backed trusts: abrdn Platinum ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:PPLT), abrdn Palladium ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:PALL), and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (NYSEARCA:PLTM). On the surface these look like three flavors of the same trade. In practice, one metal is riding a hydrogen tailwind, one is fighting the electric vehicle transition, and two of the funds hold the exact same bullion at different prices.

Why the Laggards Actually Lagged

Over the past 12 months, iShares Silver Trust (NYSEARCA:SLV) returned 62.91% and SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEARCA:GLD) returned 22.81%. PPLT gained 18.57% and PALL managed only 13.39%. Year to date the whole complex is red, but the platinum group has fallen hardest: PPLT is off 20.4%, PLTM off 20.22%, PALL off 20.86%, versus GLD down 4.75%. Gold and silver rallied on monetary demand. Platinum and palladium are industrial metals first, and softer auto builds plus WTI crude sliding from $99.76 on June 3 to $71.87 late June signaled cooling industrial expectations.

What Each Fund Is Actually Betting On

PPLT and PLTM own the same asset: physical platinum bullion in London vaults. The implicit bet is that autocatalyst substitution (platinum replacing more expensive palladium in gasoline converters), tightening South African mine supply, and hydrogen fuel cell buildout revive a metal that trades well below gold despite similar scarcity. Jewelry demand in China and India adds a floor. Platinum wins if industrial activity firms and hydrogen policy support continues.

PALL is a very different bet. Palladium’s demand is roughly 80% autocatalyst, concentrated in gasoline internal combustion engines. Every hybrid or battery EV that replaces a pure gasoline car erodes structural demand. PALL is down 56.05% over five years while PPLT rose 47.71% over the same window. That is the market pricing a demand cliff. PALL only works as a cyclical bounce trade if supply gets cut faster than demand fades.

PPLT vs PLTM: The 10 Basis Point Question

Same metal, same vault structure, different sticker. PPLT charges 0.60% annually. PLTM charges 0.50%. On $10,000 held ten years, that gap compounds meaningfully. PPLT wins on liquidity: it holds roughly $1.8 billion in assets and trades tighter spreads. PLTM is smaller and quieter but delivered 48.77% over five years versus PPLT’s 47.71%, exactly the drift you would expect from the fee difference. Traders in and out weekly should stick with PPLT. Buy-and-hold investors should default to PLTM.

The Tax Wrinkle Nobody Talks About

All three are grantor trusts holding bullion. The IRS taxes them as collectibles, meaning long-term gains are capped at a 28% federal rate rather than the 20% that applies to equity ETFs. Hold these in an IRA if possible. In a taxable account, the after-tax return gap versus a mining-equity ETF can be significant on a large gain.

The Verdict

For a cost-conscious investor making a multi-year bet on platinum’s industrial and hydrogen story, PLTM is the cleanest vehicle. For active traders who value depth of book, PPLT is worth the extra 10 basis points. PALL is the contrarian trade: cheap on any recovery scenario, but structurally exposed to EV adoption, and the five-year chart shows what happens when a metal’s primary demand source shrinks. Own it only if you have a specific view on supply cuts from Russian or South African production. What would flip the call: a hard industrial recovery paired with visible hydrogen policy wins would make PPLT and PLTM the strongest catch-up plays in the precious metals complex.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.