ETF

YMAX’s 1.33% Fee Is Just the Start: How a Fund-of-Funds Structure Is Quietly Stacking Costs on Top of Costs

YMAX advertises a 1.33% expense ratio, but that number only tells part of the story. Buried inside this fund-of-funds structure are stacked costs most investors never see until their weekly paycheck starts shrinking.

Published July 14, 2026, 6:27pm ET · 3 min read

A crumpled U.S. one-dollar bill with a large, irregular tear in its center. Through the tear, the bold black letters 'E.T.F.' are visible against a white background. Parts of the dollar bill's design, including 'FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE', 'THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA', 'ONE DOLLAR', a serial number, and the Federal Reserve Seal with the letter 'G', are still visible around the torn edges.
A torn one-dollar bill reveals 'E.T.F.', symbolizing the hidden costs and tax penalties that can impact the real yield of investments like JEPI. © zimmytws / Shutterstock.com

If you bought YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (NYSEARCA:YMAX) for its eye-catching weekly paycheck, the paycheck is shrinking. A distribution that ran $0.7317 in May 2024 paid out $0.0709 on July 8, 2026. That collapse is a cost story, and the cost is buried in a structure the marketing does not spell out.

What You’re Actually Paying

YMAX carries a gross and net expense ratio of 1.33%, per its June 18, 2026 prospectus. On a $10,000 position, that is roughly $133 a year skimmed off the top before the fund does anything for you. A comparable option-income peer, JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA:JEPI), runs a fraction of that. The difference compounds. Over a decade, a full percentage point of extra fee drag can quietly erase four figures on a modest position, before you count the second layer.

And there is a second layer. YMAX is a fund-of-funds. As of April 30, 2026, 31 of its 32 positions are other YieldMax option-income ETFs, with the balance in a money market fund. Every one of those underlying ETFs has its own expense ratio and its own trading costs. The 1.33% you see on the label sits on top of what the underlying funds already charge inside the wrapper.

The Part the Factsheet Doesn’t Highlight

Overlap is the next hidden bill. YMAX’s top holdings include AMDY at 6.848%, AMZY at 5.280%, GOOY at 4.811%, and TSMY at 4.943%. Each is a single-stock covered-call fund on a mega-cap you likely already own through an S&P 500 index fund. You are paying a premium fee to write calls on stocks you already have cheaper exposure to elsewhere in your portfolio, capping the upside on both sides of the ledger.

Then there is the yield illusion. Option-income funds routinely fund distributions with return of capital, which is your own principal handed back to you, taxed accordingly, and it shows up as NAV erosion over time. YMAX’s price tells that story: $7.82 on July 10, 2026, down 1.08% over the trailing year even before you subtract the fees you already paid. Distributions have simultaneously compressed. The trailing twelve-month total sits at $5.6337, a shadow of the $0.5339 to $0.7317 monthly range that ran from February through August 2024. Volatility inside the payout adds to the confusion: 2026 weekly distributions swung from $0.0336 on March 25 to $0.1497 on May 13. Retirees planning income around a stable check are budgeting against a moving target.

The Cheaper Mirror

JEPI covers the covered-call, income-oriented territory with a diversified equity portfolio and an options overlay at a fraction of YMAX’s fee. Its total return has also gone the other direction: JEPI’s price rose 7.97% over the year ended July 10, 2026, versus YMAX’s decline. For crypto-exposed or single-stock upside, an investor could hold the underlying shares directly and write calls in a brokerage account, capturing the premium without paying two layers of managers to do it. The exposure is not identical. YMAX offers weekly checks and thematic concentration in AI, semis, and crypto proxies. The tradeoff is what you pay for it.

What This Means for You

Before renewing your position, ask a simple question: what is the all-in cost, counting the 1.33% wrapper fee, the underlying fund fees, and the return-of-capital chipping away at NAV, and would the same income goal be reachable by owning JEPI or the underlying stocks with a covered-call plan? If the answer is that the packaging is doing more work than the strategy, you have found the hidden cost.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Michael Williams

I am a long time investor and student of business, and believe finding good companies that can become great investments is the best game on earth. After 20 years of writing and researching the public markets it is clear that individuals have never had more tools and information to take control of their financial lives. From ETFs and $0 commissions to cryptos and prediction markets there has never been a greater democratization of access to investing. 

I write to help people understand the investments available to them so they can make the best choice for their portfolio, whether they're starting out or looking for income in retirement. 

All articles →