ETF

ISPY’s 0.56% Fee Hides a $38,000 Decade-Long Performance Gap Against SPY

Photo of Ryne Mauck
By Ryne Mauck Published

Quick Read

  • ISPY's 0.56% fee and daily call-writing cost holders roughly 3 percentage points of annual upside versus the index in a rising market.

  • SPY beat ISPY by over 2 points YTD; VOO tracks the same 500 stocks at a fraction of the cost with no upside cap.

  • ISPY's return-of-capital distributions defer taxes by shrinking your cost basis, creating a larger taxable gain when you eventually sell.

  • Many financial professionals are salespeople paid on what they push, not whether you end up wealthier. A fiduciary is the opposite. The SEC legally requires them to put your interests first. Advisor.com's free matching tool pairs you with vetted fiduciaries from major national firms, all in under three minutes. See who you match with today.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
ISPY’s 0.56% Fee Hides a $38,000 Decade-Long Performance Gap Against SPY

© 24/7 Wall St.

Every time the ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (CBOE:ISPY) writes another daily call option, holders swap tomorrow’s gains for today’s yield. That swap comes at a price. It just does not show up on the marketing page next to the headline dividend rate.

What You’re Actually Paying

ISPY carries a 0.56% annual expense ratio. On $10,000 invested, that is roughly $56 straight out of your return every year. For the same 500 companies underneath, SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:VOO) charge only a fraction of that. Compound the fee gap on $10,000 over 20 years at broad market-like returns and the pure expense drag runs into four figures.

The fee is the visible cost. The bigger bill is the one buried in the strategy itself: daily call-writing means maximum income, maximum upside sacrifice.

The Part the Factsheet Doesn’t Highlight

Let’s look at what the daily covered call did in a rising market. Year to date through August 6th, ISPY returned 10.4% while SPY returned 12.71%. Over the past year, ISPY posted 18.93% against SPY’s 21.46%. The gap is the upside you sold for premium income. A sister ProShares prospectus describes the mechanism plainly: an options overlay “designed to provide exposure similar to owning the Underlying Security while generating option premiums, which may limit upside returns.”

Then there is the tax issue. ISPY’s distributions are “largely tax-efficient, primarily funded by return of capital”. However, return of capital only defers tax. As such, ROC reduces your cost basis, which means a larger capital gain (or smaller loss) when you sell. You are simply deferring tax. Additionally, the “income” itself is lumpy: a $1.274928 payout in May 2025 was followed by $0.04531 three months later. If you planned to build a monthly budget on the yield, the fund has complicated that for you.

One more line item worth noting. On May 31, 2026, ISPY held 10.05% of net assets ($130.3 million) in the ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF. That cash sleeve supports the options program, but it also means roughly a tenth of your money is not fully in equities on any given day. Cash drag is another quiet cost to consider when buying ISPY.

The Cheaper Mirror

For pure S&P 500 exposure, VOO’s expense ratio is significantly less. Zero call writing, zero upside cap, no ROC math to untangle at tax time. If you specifically want a covered-call sleeve at lower cost, JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF (NYSEARCA:JEPI) charges 0.35% and writes monthly calls on a defensive equity sleeve. The trade-off: JEPI’s more defensive book tends to lag in strong bull markets, while ISPY’s daily reset captures a bit more upside than monthly-call peers. Neither replicates SPY, but both cost less than ISPY.

What This Means for You

ISPY “works” in flat or choppy markets, where its structure does what it advertises. The real question is whether the 0.56% fee and the roughly three-percentage-point gap versus the index over the past year is worth it. If the answer is “yes, the fund provides monthly checks I would not otherwise generate,” the math may still work for you. If the answer is “the fund provides S&P 500 exposure with a nice yield attached,” a plain index fund plus a scheduled withdrawal could deliver the same paycheck for a fraction of the drag.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Ryne Mauck
About the Author Ryne Mauck →

Ryne Mauck is an individual investor, analyst, and investment writer. Drawing on his experience in financial analysis, municipal bonds, and regulatory compliance, he manages his own portfolio with a focus on ETFs, macroeconomic trends, and value-oriented investment opportunities.

His investment approach is grounded in rational decision-making, downside protection, and independent thinking. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide readers with clear, research-driven insights into valuation, fundamentals, portfolio construction, and risk management. His goal is to help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a disciplined long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

ABNB Vol: 15,913,532
MCHP Vol: 19,139,274
PLTR Vol: 77,244,625
MRNA Vol: 6,820,582
AXON Vol: 1,591,869

Top Losing Stocks

TTD Vol: 133,458,224
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
AKAM Vol: 8,143,961
ZTS Vol: 12,784,553
RMD Vol: 3,810,438