The Covered Call Tax Trap: These 3 ETFs Pay Around 12 Percent and Legally Shield Most of It From the IRS

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • SPYI and QQQI deliver 12% and 14% monthly yields using Section 1256 index options, shielding most distributions from ordinary income tax rates.

  • JEPI and JEPQ distribute ordinary income from equity-linked notes, creating higher tax drag that compounds against taxable-account investors over time.

  • ISPY's daily call reset preserves more S&P 500 upside, delivering 17% total returns at a lower 4.6% yield than SPYI or QQQI.

  • Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

The Covered Call Tax Trap: These 3 ETFs Pay Around 12 Percent and Legally Shield Most of It From the IRS

© Aksana Mestnaya / Shutterstock.com

Covered call ETFs promise double-digit yields from a broad equity index. Three funds stand out for how they handle taxes: the NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (NASDAQ:SPYI), the NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (NASDAQ:QQQI), and the ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (NASDAQ:ISPY).

SPYI and QQQI deliver low-teens yields while structuring most payouts as return of capital rather than ordinary income. ISPY uses a daily call overlay that trades current yield for more equity participation. All three sit in the covered call category, but the tax character differs meaningfully from peers like JEPI and JEPQ.

Why Tax Character Matters More Than Headline Yield

The NEOS funds rely on Section 1256 of the tax code. Options on broad-based indexes like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 qualify as 1256 contracts, taxed as 60% long-term and 40% short-term regardless of holding period. That sits below the ordinary income rate applied to premium from single-stock equity-linked notes, which JEPI and JEPQ use.

Return of capital adds a second layer. When option premium plus realized gains do not fully cover a monthly distribution, the shortfall is classified as ROC. ROC lowers cost basis, deferring the tax hit until shares are sold. For a taxable investor collecting monthly income, that combination pushes the effective tax rate well below the headline yield.

SPYI: The Scale Play on the S&P 500

At the largest scale, this fund delivers the tax structure. The fund holds 512 individual securities tracking the S&P 500 while writing SPX index call options. Assets sit at roughly $10.71 billion, with an expense ratio of 0.68%. SPYI’s combination of scale, tax efficiency, and broad market exposure makes it a standout in the options-income space.

Distribution yield runs near 12%, paid monthly, with recent payouts clustering between $0.5104 and $0.5353 per share. Total return over the past year came in at 17%, while price alone is up 18% over twelve months.

The payout ratio of 330% reflects the strategy: NEOS distributes option premium and 1256 gains, not corporate earnings, with much classified as ROC for taxable accounts. The tradeoff is capped upside during sharp rallies. SPYI participates in most moves but sacrifices the right tail to call writers.

QQQI: The Same Playbook on a Higher Volatility Index

This fund applies the identical NEOS overlay to the Nasdaq-100. Higher implied volatility on tech names translates into fatter premiums, pushing the distribution yield near 14% against SPYI’s roughly 12%. The fund manages $13.38 billion and charges 0.68%, having launched on January 30, 2024. QQQI’s higher yield reflects the elevated volatility of its underlying tech-heavy index.

Monthly distributions in 2026 have ranged from $0.6089 to $0.6589 per share, with trailing twelve-month totals reaching $7.63. Total return over the past year came to 19%. Tax treatment mirrors SPYI because NDX options qualify as 1256 contracts, and the payout ratio of 518% signals heavy ROC classification.

The Nasdaq-100’s concentration in mega-cap technology is the tradeoff. Sector drawdowns hit QQQI harder than broader index funds, and the covered call overlay does not fully offset sustained declines. QQQI dropped 3% over the past month while SPYI was roughly flat.

ISPY: The Contrarian Pick That Keeps More Upside

This fund belongs on this list for a different reason. ProShares runs a daily covered call program rather than monthly, resetting call strikes each session against its proprietary daily covered call index. The design keeps more equity upside available while generating premium income. The distribution yield sits near 4.6%, with a trailing twelve-month total of $2.23 per share.

That is well below SPYI and QQQI, which is intentional. This ETF delivered a 17% total return over the past year and carries a beta of 0.87. The fund holds 512 positions, manages $1.24 billion, and charges 0.56%. It launched on December 18, 2023.

Options are written on SPY and SPX index options depending on the day, with its 1099 historically showing qualified dividend income, 1256 treatment, and some ROC. Distributions range from $0.045 to $1.27 per share across the last eighteen months. For investors wanting smaller income and more S&P 500 return, ISPY’s structure is the appeal.

Matching the Fund to the Investor

The S&P 500’s most tax-efficient income generator fits investors seeking the highest yield the index can deliver, accepting capped upside in strong rallies. A similar trade with more volatility on both ends is QQQI, suited to accounts absorbing tech drawdowns for the largest headline yield. For those wanting covered call mechanics as a return smoother rather than an income engine, ISPY makes sense, valuing more index upside over a twelve-handle distribution. SPYI, QQQI, and ISPY each offer distinct tradeoffs within the options-income landscape.

Inside a taxable account, tax character shapes what actually lands in the checking account each month, and the difference between these three funds and their ordinary-income peers can compound meaningfully over time.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

IP Vol: 11,975,298
SLB Vol: 28,901,066
DLR Vol: 10,764,777
PKG Vol: 1,424,156
NOW Vol: 29,625,381

Top Losing Stocks

CHRW Vol: 3,602,159
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
INTC Vol: 181,129,771
WST Vol: 1,508,636
MU Vol: 40,804,475