ETF

JEPQ Trailed the Nasdaq-100 by $17,970 on $300,000 Over One Year. The Covered Calls Are Why

Putting $300,000 into a high-yield Nasdaq fund that pays monthly sounds like a retiree's dream, but the number your account statement never shows tells a very different story about what those monthly checks actually cost you.

Published October 7, 2026, 6:33pm ET · 3 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

An overhead shot of a cork board with multiple papers pinned to it. A yellow sticky note shows a hand-drawn bar chart labeled A, B, C, and an upward trend arrow. A blue sticky note prominently displays 'OPTIONS TRADING' in bold black letters. Another blue sticky note shows a hand-drawn horizontal bar chart with numbers 1 through 5 on the vertical axis. A larger printed document in the upper right features a multi-colored line graph with values ranging from 3,000 to 8,050, alongside colored rectangles showing dollar values like '2$', '-0,16$', '+04,12$', '-00,41$', and '+03,71$'. A lower printed document partially visible shows 'CT MANUFACTURING' and a pie chart with segments labeled 38% and 35%. The papers are held by yellow and blue thumbtacks.
Various charts and a note about 'Options Trading' symbolize the analytical approach to financial markets, a key aspect when considering investment strategies like covered calls. © SkazovD / Shutterstock.com

A retiree who put $300,000 into JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ:JEPQ) a year ago got a check every month. The account’s total value, including all distributions reinvested, ended at $359,160. In the Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF (NASDAQ:QQQM), a plain Nasdaq-100 index fund, that same investment grew to $377,130. The difference is $17,970, and no monthly income statement reflects this opportunity cost.

How the $17,970 Gap Was Measured

Both funds are measured on a dividend-adjusted basis over the same one-year window ending October 6, 2026. JEPQ returned 19.72%. QQQM, the Nasdaq-100 stand-in here, returned 25.71%. That gap of 5.99 percentage points works out to about $599 for every $10,000 invested.

The method matters. JEPQ pays out a lot: $6.88454 per share over the trailing 12 months, paid monthly. Looking at price alone would have made JEPQ look far worse. The adjusted basis counts every distribution as part of the holder’s return. The shortfall is what remains after all that income is included.

So far this year, the gap is wider. Through October 6, JEPQ returned 15.16%, and QQQM returned 24.18%. On $300,000 invested on January 1, that 9.02-point spread comes to about $27,060.

Why one year and not five? JEPQ’s distribution record starts on June 1, 2022. It has a shorter history. The index fund it is measured against has been around much longer, so a five-year comparison does not exist.

Selling Upside to Pay the Monthly Check

JEPQ makes its income by selling away part of the upside on its Nasdaq-100 exposure. Buyers of that upside pay the fund cash, called an option premium. The fund keeps the premium. But when the index rises past the point where the upside was sold, it loses the gains above that point. In a strong rally, those forgone gains can outweigh the income collected, and that cost never appears as an explicit fee.

The stock side looks a lot like the index. As of June 30, 2026, NVIDIA made up 6.59% of net assets, Apple 5.74%, Micron 5.50%, Alphabet 4.98%, and Microsoft 3.84%. Together, those five came to about 26.65% of a fund with $40.66 billion in net assets. The same filing lists structured notes from large banks, which carry the income strategy, so holders get exposure to familiar megacap stocks, but with a cap on how much of any rally they capture.

Taxes add a second drag in taxable accounts. Income from this strategy is generally taxed as ordinary income rather than at the lower qualified-dividend rate. Check the fund’s annual tax breakdown before you count the entire yield as usable.

Downside Cushion Is the Point of the Trade

The same mechanism helps when the index falls. The option premium collected cushions a decline that an index fund holder would absorb in full. The strategy is built to work that way. The window studied here was a rising market, which is exactly when this approach is expected to lag. Compare the same two funds over a falling market, and you would likely see a very different result. No drawdown period was analyzed here, so this article makes no claim about how JEPQ performed during any past market selloff.

Cheaper Ways to Own the Nasdaq-100

Anyone wanting the full index can own it directly. Besides QQQM, there is Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ), which seeks to track the investment results, before fees and expenses, of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Its prospectus lists a management fee of 0.18%. That trade-off is clear. These funds keep every point of upside but pay small dividends and offer no protection in a decline. Income would have to come from selling shares.

Who JEPQ Suits and Who Is Misreading It

JEPQ fits a retiree who wants a large, regular monthly check and knowingly gives up some growth to get it. That is a reasonable choice. The person misunderstanding it is the investor who thinks JEPQ is the Nasdaq-100 with a dividend on top. It acts as a different investment, and over many rising years the gap compounds in a way no distribution statement shows.

Before buying any options income fund, run one comparison. Line it up against its plain index fund on a dividend-adjusted total return basis over the same dates. Then decide whether the monthly check is worth the difference.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →