ETF

Forget PIMCO’s PDI. BlackRock’s DVY Returned 171.32% Over Ten Years Against PDI’s 77.64%.

Retirees flock to PIMCO's PDI for its generous monthly checks, but stacking it against a straightforward dividend ETF reveals a total-return gap that decades of income payments struggle to explain.

Published October 19, 2026, 8:33pm ET · 4 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A close-up of a person's hand holding a black stylus, touching a digital tablet screen. The screen displays a glowing blue and pink financial candlestick chart, overlaid with a dynamic, neon-outlined bull figure charging to the right. The background is dark blue, with subtle light effects and particles, creating a modern, high-tech financial market scene.
An investor analyzes market data as a vibrant bull symbolizes the strong upward momentum for Amazon stock, following significant analyst upgrades and a price target raise. © Shutterstock

The PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (NYSE:PDI) is a high-income closed-end fund, and many retirees buy PDI for its large monthly distribution. While that income is real, PDI’s total return record is much weaker than a plain dividend stock fund. Over ten years, PDI returned 77.64% with distributions reinvested. iShares Select Dividend ETF (NASDAQ:DVY) returned 171.32%, a lead of 93.68 percentage points. Both ten-year periods begin on October 17, 2016. The same $100,000 position grew to $271,320 in DVY and $177,640 in PDI.

What These Ten-Year Figures Assume

Both ten-year figures assume every distribution was reinvested. That assumption matters far more for PDI than for DVY. PDI’s payout is large, and many buyers own it to spend the cash. If you collected and spent the monthly checks, your ending balance came in below the $177,640 outcome. Your result depends on how much you withdrew and when, and no single figure shows it.

Two Very Different Kinds of Funds

PDI is a closed-end fund. It seeks current income as a primary objective and capital appreciation as a secondary objective and invests across multiple fixed-income sectors.

DVY is an exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of relatively high dividend-paying U.S. equities. One owns debt, and the other owns stocks. They carry different risks and react to different conditions, so this comparison only measures what each returned to shareholders. This comparison still treats them as distinct products.

How a Closed-End Fund’s Price Can Drift From Its Portfolio

A closed-end fund has a fixed pool of shares that trade on an exchange. Buyers and sellers set the share price, and that price can sit above or below the per-share value of the assets the fund holds. So a return measured on market price can differ from how the underlying portfolio performed. PDI holders should know which measure they are looking at, because a change in how the market prices the fund affects their account value even when the underlying portfolio stays flat.

PDI Trails on Every Longer Scoreboard

Period DVY PDI DVY Lead
Five years 60.19% 10.27% 49.92 points
One year 16.33% -13.62% 29.95 points
Year to date 15.26% -7.05% 22.31 points

DVY leads in all three periods, and PDI has lost money over both the past year and year-to-date. So the ten-year gap is not the result of just one bad stretch long ago. It shows up in the recent record too.

One stretch favors PDI. Over the past month, PDI returned 2.77% while DVY returned -1.12%. However, a single month does not outweigh a record built over one, five, and ten years of data.

Why Retirees Still Own PDI: Far More Cash

Income is where PDI clearly wins. Over the trailing twelve months, a $100,000 position in PDI paid $18,352.98. The same stake in DVY paid $3,362.85, so PDI returned $14,990.13 more cash. PDI pays monthly, and DVY pays quarterly.

PDI’s latest monthly distribution was $0.2205 per share, with an ex-dividend date of October 13, 2026. That matched the prior month. DVY’s latest quarterly distribution was $1.329141 per share, up from $1.247215 the quarter before.

PDI’s payout structure serves retirees who need large, regular cash flow. The trade-off for that cash flow is a much weaker total-return record. Some closed-end fund distributions also include a return of the investor’s own capital rather than earned income, so read the fund’s distribution notices to see how each payment breaks down (we highlighted the seven warning signs that a big yield is masking trouble in a free report here: Dividend Traps).

Tax Effects of Shifting Between PDI and DVY

In an IRA or 401(k), selling PDI to buy DVY triggers no immediate tax. In a taxable account, a sale realizes a capital gain or loss based on the gap between your sale price and your cost basis, so the result depends on the cost basis of each lot. Some investors consider a partial move — keeping enough PDI to cover monthly spending and shifting only reinvested income into DVY. Since DVY pays quarterly, anyone relying on it for bills will need a cash reserve to cover the months between payments.

Which Fund Fits Reinvestors Versus Income Spenders

If you reinvest distributions or won’t need the cash for years, DVY’s lead over ten years, five years, one year, and year-to-date makes it the stronger total-return choice. If you need PDI’s monthly checks to pay bills now, PDI does that job, and DVY cannot match it dollar for dollar. Some investors in this position keep in PDI only the portion they plan to spend and direct reinvested income elsewhere.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →