Moochers Mean Lost Revenue for Netflix, Other Streaming Services

Print Email

They said streaming video would kill cable as millions of users cut the cord. Then they said that it would kill cable bundling into packages that include hundreds of channels that no one watches. Then they said streaming video might be killing itself.

Well, it’s not quite that bad, but streaming video has run into a problem that it probably expected but that it hasn’t yet figured out how to stop without alienating several million people. According to a report at, an estimated 24 million Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) users don’t pay for the service. Prime Video from Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN) and Hulu are each enjoyed by an estimated 5 million non-paying customers.

Netflix counts about 137 million paying subscribers worldwide, equal to about 85% — or 161 million — of all Netflix users, both paying and non-paying. The firm also calculated Amazon Prime Video had 26 million paying subscribers, or 83.5% of all Prime Video users. That works out to 31 million total users. Hulu’s paying users accounted for nearly 81% — 20 million — of 25 million total users.

Using a base Netflix streaming price of $7.99 a month, calculated that the leading streaming video subscription service is giving away $192 million a month ($2.3 billion annually) to users who are not paying for a subscription. Prime Video is losing $540 million a year and Hulu is giving away $480 million.

Parents are the go-to source for moochers. Nearly 38% of Netflix moochers are using a parent’s subscription, while 32% of Prime moochers and 26% of Hulu moochers use parents’ plans. Siblings and significant others account for most of the rest. Combined, the top three sources are responsible for 64% of all Netflix moochers, over 70% of Amazon Prime moochers and more than 28% of Hulu moochers.

It’s not as if any of the three major streaming services is charging too much. Netflix and Hulu cost $8 a month and Amazon’s Prime Video costs $9 a month, or $13 monthly including the entire range of Prime services. More likely, people have figured out that to get the programming they want they must subscribe to both a cable/satellite package and a streaming service. found that 62% of people included in its survey subscribed to both, and nearly 30% subscribed only to streaming services.

Notice the plural. Not Netflix, Prime or Hulu offers everything, even in streaming. Streaming HBO Now is available for $15 a month, ESPN streaming packages start at $4 a month, CBS offers its All Access service for $6 a month with ads and $10 a month without, and Disney will enter the fray later this year. A sports-free streaming package of 43 channels is available from Philo TV beginning at $16 a month. Hulu with Live TV offers the traditional over-the-air networks and about 55 other channels for $45 a month.  It’s starting to add up.

The point is that for consumers who want everything, streaming is unlikely to be cheaper than a cable/satellite package. It is merely more customizable. The first cable/satellite company that offers true a la carte programming choices to its customers could win big here. Is that day coming soon to a screen near you? Stay tuned.

I'm interested in the Newsletter