The Unfortunate Truth About Claiming Social Security at Your Full Retirement Age

Photo of Christy Bieber
By Christy Bieber Updated Published

Quick Read

  • Full retirement age sounds like the obvious default. Yet for most retirees, claiming then is quietly one of the costliest Social Security mistakes they can make. See why FRA may cost you →

  • Your Social Security check doesn't stop growing at full retirement age, and the math on what happens next might change when you decide to retire. See how benefits keep growing →

  • A landmark study found that the vast majority of retirees leave serious lifetime income on the table by claiming at the 'standard' time. Find out which side of that stat you're on. Find out which side you're on →

  • There's a specific age you need to reach for a delayed claim to actually pay off, and calculating that age is simpler than most people think. Calculate your break-even age →

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The Unfortunate Truth About Claiming Social Security at Your Full Retirement Age

© Lane V. Erickson / Shutterstock.com

Your decision about when to claim Social Security is one of the most consequential financial choices you will make in retirement. You have an eight-year window to start benefits, but claiming at 62 (the earliest option) produces a very different outcome than claiming at 70 (the age at which delayed credits stop accruing). The gap between those two choices can amount to hundreds of dollars a month for the rest of your life, and that difference compounds over time.

For many people, full retirement age feels like the obvious default. Full retirement age, or FRA, is the point at which you become eligible for your standard benefit, also called your primary insurance amount. Claiming then requires no complicated math and no sacrifice of early checks. Why not simply file then?

When you dig into the details of benefit optimization, claiming at FRA often turns out to be less than ideal. Here is why.

When is your full retirement age for Social Security?

Your FRA depends entirely on when you were born. Here is the schedule based on your birth year:


An infographic showing the gradual increase of Social Security's full retirement age from 66 to 67 based on a person's birth year.




One year can cost you months of benefits. Check the schedule to see exactly when the government says you can finally claim your full Social Security check.
© 24/7 Wall St.

For anyone born in 1960 or later, FRA is 67. That is two full years later than the age 65 threshold that applied to earlier generations, and it is the permanent FRA under current Social Security law. The 1983 Social Security Amendments set this phase-in in motion, raising the FRA in two-month steps by birth year until it reached 67 for everyone born in 1960 or after. In 2026, that 42-year phase-in is complete. Even so, reaching FRA does not necessarily mean you are collecting the largest benefit available to you.

Why claiming Social Security at full retirement age may not be the right move

The case against claiming at full retirement age comes down to one straightforward fact: benefits keep growing after FRA. Each month you delay past your FRA, your monthly check rises by 2/3 of 1%. That accumulation continues until you turn 70, at which point no further delay earns additional credits.

That monthly rate works out to an 8% annual increase. Consider a retiree whose FRA benefit is $2,000 per month. Waiting three full years to claim at 70 produces a 24% boost, lifting that payment to $2,480 and delivering $5,760 more per year. Critically, that higher base persists for life. The concrete stakes are visible in the SSA’s own published 2026 maximums: a worker with a maximum earnings history could receive $4,152 per month at FRA, $5,181 at 70, and only $2,969 at 62. Claiming at FRA instead of 70 in that scenario means leaving roughly $1,000 per month on the table.

Inflation protection adds another layer to the advantage of delaying. Social Security cost-of-living adjustments are applied as a percentage of your full benefit amount. The 2026 COLA is 2.8%, which lifted the average retired worker’s monthly payment by $56, from $2,015 to $2,071. Because that percentage is applied to the full benefit, a larger base produces larger dollar increases each year. The dollar gap between someone who delayed and someone who claimed early widens a little more with every annual adjustment.

Should you wait to claim your Social Security?

A layered composite image shows the white dome and front facade of the U.S. Capitol Building, featuring its columns and an American flag. It is overlaid onto sections of green and white one hundred dollar bills and multiple blue-on-white documents with the text 'SOCIAL SECURITY', along with a background pattern of a blue financial bar graph. The overall impression is one of governmental finance and policy.

zimmytws / Shutterstock.com

zimmytws / Shutterstock.com

The real question is whether a delay will maximize the total benefits you collect over your lifetime. An extra $480 per month feels meaningful only if you live long enough to recoup the checks you skipped. A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that more than 90% of Americans between the ages of 45 and 62 would optimize lifetime income by waiting until 70 to claim.

The reason delaying works out so well for so many people traces back to the original design of the delayed retirement credit system. It was calibrated when life expectancies were shorter, built to equalize total lifetime payouts regardless of whether a person claimed early or late. Rising lifespans have tipped the math firmly in favor of those who wait, because they collect the higher benefit for more years than the system’s designers anticipated.

The program’s long-term finances add another layer to this decision. According to the Social Security Board of Trustees’ 2026 annual report, released June 9, 2026, the combined retirement and disability trust funds are projected to be depleted in 2034. At that point, ongoing payroll tax revenue would cover only 83% of scheduled benefits. The retirement-only OASI trust fund faces a tighter timeline: projected depletion in the fourth quarter of 2032, when approximately 78% of retirement benefits would be payable. Congress has addressed past shortfalls and could act again, but the uncertainty adds real weight to the timing decision for anyone still years from claiming.

To figure out the right timing for your situation, calculate your break-even age. That is the point at which the higher monthly benefit from delaying overtakes the cumulative checks you gave up while waiting.

The math works like this:

  • Calculate how much income you gave up by waiting: If your FRA benefit is $2,000 and you wait until 70, you forgo three years of $2,000 monthly checks, totaling $72,000.
  • Calculate how much higher your delayed benefit is: A $2,000 FRA benefit grows to $2,480 at 70, generating $480 more per month.
  • Find the break-even point: Divide $72,000 by $480 per month and you get 150 months, or 12.5 years beyond your claiming age of 70.

Someone who claims at 70 breaks even at roughly age 82 to 83. Given that many retirees do reach that age, waiting beyond FRA is often the stronger financial choice. Health, personal finances, and other individual factors still matter in every case. A financial advisor can walk you through a personalized analysis and help you decide which claiming age fits your circumstances.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to include the SSA’s 2026 published maximum monthly benefits ($2,969 at 62, $4,152 at FRA, and $5,181 at 70 for workers at the taxable wage base), and to incorporate the Social Security Board of Trustees’ 2026 annual report finding that the OASI retirement trust fund is projected to deplete in Q4 2032 at 78% payability, while the combined OASDI fund is projected to deplete in 2034 at 83% payability.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Christy Bieber
About the Author Christy Bieber →

Christy Bieber has been a personal finance and legal writer since 2008. She has a JD from UCLA School of Law and a BA in English, Media and Communications with a certification in business from the University of Rochester.  

Christy has been published by a wide variety of sites, including WSJ Buy Side, Forbes,  Kiplinger, Fox Business, Credit Karma, Insurify, and Annuity.org. In addition to writing for the web, she has also ghostwritten textbooks on business and law and served as a subject matter expert for course design. 

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MRNA Vol: 87,315,627
COIN Vol: 22,740,003
FCX Vol: 29,776,620
ALB Vol: 3,308,526
EL Vol: 6,022,533

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
SRE Vol: 5,176,593
EIX Vol: 3,946,409
AEP Vol: 5,247,385
CNP Vol: 7,823,794