Suze Orman Has a Stern Warning on Social Security. You Should Listen to Her

Photo of Christy Bieber
By Christy Bieber Updated Published

Quick Read

  • Claiming Social Security at 62 permanently cuts your benefit by 30%, shrinking a $2,000 monthly check to just $1,400 for life.

  • Waiting until 70 boosts benefits 24% above full retirement age, and a NBER study found over 90% of workers maximize lifetime income by doing so.

  • Early claiming also shrinks the survivor benefit a spouse receives, and the OASI trust fund is projected to cover only 78% of benefits by 2032.

  • Many financial professionals are salespeople paid on what they push, not whether you end up wealthier. A fiduciary is the opposite. The SEC legally requires them to put your interests first. Advisor.com's free matching tool pairs you with vetted fiduciaries from major national firms, all in under three minutes. See who you match with today.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Suze Orman Has a Stern Warning on Social Security. You Should Listen to Her

© Lane V. Erickson / Shutterstock.com

As a retiree, you will almost certainly rely on Social Security for at least part of your income, and the single most consequential choice you face is deciding when to start your monthly benefit.

Suze Orman has strong opinions on that question, and her advice could make a meaningful difference to your finances. She has issued a stern warning that every near-retiree should read before filing a claim with the Social Security Administration.

Here is what that warning says, and why it deserves your full attention.

Suze Orman’s stern warning on Social Security

Orman posted her Social Security warning on LinkedIn, writing: “Are you (or a family member) considering when to start claiming your Social Security benefits? It’s crucial to weigh your options carefully. While you can start claiming at 62, keep in mind that your benefit will be permanently lower than if you wait.”

The warning targets a decision that catches many people off guard. Age 62 is the earliest you can claim Social Security retirement benefits, and a large share of retirees start their checks at that point. Some do so because they feel financially ready to retire and assume they need those checks immediately. Others simply do not realize how much an early claim costs them over the long run. Because the government will send checks the moment you qualify, waiting can feel counterintuitive.

As Orman points out, claiming at 62 locks in a much smaller monthly check for life. Every worker has a designated full retirement age (FRA). For anyone born in 1960 or later, that age is 67. Claiming before FRA triggers a permanent benefit reduction, while claiming after FRA earns delayed retirement credits that increase your check for as long as you live.

Many people underestimate how large that reduction will be, and very few realize it cannot be undone. Once you lock in an early benefit, you can never recapture the monthly income you gave up by not waiting.

Why Orman’s warning on claiming Social Security deserves attention

An infographic titled 'Suze Orman's Stern Social Security Warning: Don't Claim Your Benefits Too Early.' It visually compares Social Security benefits across different claiming ages, showing a 30% reduction at age 62 versus a 24% increase at age 70 relative to the full retirement age of 67.

24/7 Wall St.

24/7 Wall St.

An early claim carries serious long-term consequences. Every month you claim before FRA triggers an early-filing penalty: 5/9 of 1% per month for the first 36 months before FRA, and 5/12 of 1% per month for any months beyond that. Those penalties compound to a 30% permanent reduction for someone with an FRA of 67 who claims at 62. In concrete dollar terms, a benefit of $2,000 at FRA shrinks to just $1,400 at 62. Real-world SSA data from December 2025 tells the same story: new claimants who started benefits at 62 received an average of $1,335 per month, while new claimants who waited until 67 received an average of $2,521.

Delayed retirement credits reward patience on the other end of the spectrum. Waiting beyond FRA adds 2/3 of 1% per month, equal to 8% per year. Someone with an FRA of 67 who holds off until age 70 would collect a benefit 24% higher than their full amount. A 2022 National Bureau of Economic Research study found that more than 90% of workers between ages 45 and 62 would maximize their lifetime Social Security income by waiting until 70 to claim. Yet early-claiming applications surged in 2025: according to an Urban Institute analysis of SSA data, more than 2.3 million older Americans filed for retirement benefits between January and July of that year, a 16% jump compared with the same period in 2024. Program experts cited economic anxiety, recent changes at the SSA, and fears about the program’s long-term finances as key drivers.

The stakes are even higher for married couples. An early claim does not just shrink your own check; it also reduces the survivor benefit your spouse could collect if you were the higher earner. By claiming early, you could leave your partner with less guaranteed income for decades.

The broader context makes Orman’s warning more urgent. Social Security’s 2026 cost-of-living adjustment came in at 2.8%, adding roughly $56 to the average retiree’s monthly check and pushing the average monthly benefit to about $2,071. At the same time, Medicare Part B premiums rose to $202.90 per month for 2026, an increase of $17.90 from the prior year’s $185.00. Because those premiums are deducted directly from most retirees’ Social Security checks, the net raise many people actually see is considerably smaller than the headline COLA figure. Claiming at 62 locks in a permanently reduced base, and that smaller base is then subject to the same rising costs year after year.

The program’s long-term finances add a further layer of urgency. The Social Security Board of Trustees, in its June 2026 annual report, projects that the combined Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance trust funds will be depleted by the third quarter of 2034, at which point ongoing payroll tax revenue would cover about 83% of scheduled benefits. Looked at separately, the retirement-focused OASI trust fund is projected to run short even sooner, in the fourth quarter of 2032, at which point it could cover only 78% of scheduled benefits. The trustees cited the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a 2025 federal tax package, as a key reason for the acceleration: its provisions are expected to reduce income tax revenue flowing into the trust funds going forward. None of this means benefits would disappear, but it reinforces why locking in the largest possible monthly check matters so much.

Many retirees today outlive the life expectancies that shaped Social Security’s original design. The early-filing penalties and delayed retirement credits were calibrated to even out lifetime benefits for early and late claimers. Because so many people now live well into their 80s and beyond, waiting until 70 typically results in collecting far more over a lifetime. The break-even point, the age at which a late claimer’s cumulative benefits surpass what an early claimer collected, typically falls around age 82, well within reach for a healthy retiree today.

Taking Orman’s warning seriously and holding off until 70 can be one of the most consequential financial decisions you make. A larger, guaranteed monthly check later in life, when other income sources may have dwindled, provides a cushion that no other retirement asset can fully replicate.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to reflect the Urban Institute’s finding that early Social Security retirement claims rose 16% in the first seven months of 2025, and to incorporate the 2026 Social Security Trustees Report’s finding that the OASI trust fund is now projected to deplete in Q4 2032 covering only 78% of benefits, with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act identified as a key factor reducing future trust fund revenue.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Christy Bieber
About the Author Christy Bieber →

Christy Bieber has been a personal finance and legal writer since 2008. She has a JD from UCLA School of Law and a BA in English, Media and Communications with a certification in business from the University of Rochester.  

Christy has been published by a wide variety of sites, including WSJ Buy Side, Forbes,  Kiplinger, Fox Business, Credit Karma, Insurify, and Annuity.org. In addition to writing for the web, she has also ghostwritten textbooks on business and law and served as a subject matter expert for course design. 

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

SMCI Vol: 166,040,003
DELL Vol: 6,243,947
HPE Vol: 22,395,167
STX Vol: 4,732,264
ANET Vol: 10,008,622

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
TPL Vol: 505,241
COR Vol: 2,611,047
FSLR Vol: 3,071,616
AXON Vol: 1,079,711