They Put the House in a Trust in 2019 and Forgot About It. When He Went Into a Nursing Home in 2025, the $9,000-a-Month Bill Never Touched It.
Most families assume their trust protects the house from a nursing home, but one word buried in that document determines whether Medicaid can take everything or touch nothing at all.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
If you own a home and you’re worried about a future nursing home wiping out everything you meant to leave your kids, there is a piece of estate planning most people misunderstand: an irrevocable trust can shield your house from Medicaid spend-down and estate recovery, but only if you set it up years before you need care. That is the buried rule inside a product that plenty of families already own: the family home. A revocable living trust, the kind most people actually have, does not. It provides no such protection.
Only One Type of Trust Actually Shields the House
How the Five-Year Clock Actually Works
When you apply for Medicaid long-term care, the agency looks backward at asset transfers. A transfer made within five years of applying for Medicaid long-term care benefits generally triggers a penalty period of ineligibility. Move the house into a properly drafted irrevocable trust, wait out that window, and the home is generally no longer a countable asset. Because the property is also out of your probate estate at death, it is generally beyond the reach of estate recovery, the process by which the state tries to claw back what it paid for your care by going after assets you left behind. The scenario in the headline works because the transfer happened well before care was needed, clearing the five-year look-back.
Consider the couple who deeded their home into an irrevocable trust in 2019. When skilled nursing care became necessary in 2025, the statutory 60-month look-back window had fully expired. Because the house was no longer a countable asset, Medicaid covered the $9,000 monthly care bill without requiring home equity spend-down or post-death estate recovery.
Suze Orman’s Warning You Should Hear First
Radio host Suze Orman has been blunt about the trade-offs. “You can put it in an irrevocable trust, and somebody else will have control over it. But what happens if something happens to the person who has control over it?” she has said, warning that families sometimes prioritize protecting the house over quality of care, and that Medicaid nursing home care is not equivalent to private-pay care. Those trade-offs are worth weighing before executing any documents.
Who This Fits, and Who Should Skip It
This planning tends to fit homeowners in their 60s or early 70s who are healthy today, expect to stay in the home, and want to leave it to heirs. It is a poor fit if you already have a diagnosis pointing toward care within five years, if the home is your only liquid resource, or if you are not comfortable permanently giving up ownership. Rules and interpretation vary by state, and some states apply an expanded estate recovery definition.
Steps to Take Before You Touch the Deed
- Pull out your existing trust document and confirm whether it says revocable or irrevocable. If revocable, it does not protect the home from Medicaid.
- Hire a licensed elder law attorney in your state. A defective trust is worse than no trust.
- Decide with counsel whether to retain a right to live in the home and a right to income, provisions commonly written into these trusts.
- Ask specifically how the trust handles cost basis at death. Whether heirs get a stepped-up basis depends on how the trust is drafted, and a poorly structured trust can create a large tax bill for heirs.
- Fund the trust by retitling the deed. An unfunded trust protects nothing.
Catches That Undo the Whole Plan
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.








