Laid Off at 62 From an Employee-Owned Steel Mill: Should He Claim Social Security or Spend the 401(k) First?

When the gate at an employee-owned Illinois steel mill locked for good, 253 workers walked away with intact retirement savings and one brutal question none of the retraining programs could answer: touching that 401(k) first might actually be the smarter…

Published July 22, 2026, 10:04am ET · 5 min read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

An older man with graying hair and a plaid shirt sits at a wooden kitchen table. He is holding a pen over a document labeled 'Social Security Statement' and presses his left hand to his forehead, looking distraught. A calculator and a silver laptop are also on the table. In the background, a window overlooks a suburban street, and a kitchen with wooden cabinets is visible.
A 62-year-old man, recently laid off, sits at his kitchen table, grappling with the complex financial decisions of when to claim Social Security benefits and how to manage his 401(k). © 24/7 Wall St.

The morning shift shows up. The gate is locked. Word spreads by phone that the mill is done. That is roughly how it unfolded for the 253 workers at an employee-owned Illinois steel mill whose closure sent longtime employees home with intact retirement accounts and unanswered questions. Local agencies arranged unemployment help, retraining, and manufacturer connections, but none of that touches the question keeping a 62-year-old up at night: turn on Social Security now, or live off the 401(k) until the checks are bigger?

He is 62, earned $75,000 a year running equipment, has roughly $420,000 in a 401(k), no retiree medical coverage, and three years until Medicare eligibility at 65. On forums where displaced steel and auto workers trade notes, the same dilemma keeps surfacing: is it smarter to take the reduced check now, or draw down savings and let the benefit grow? There is no single clean answer, but there is a clear way to think through it.

The Permanent Cost of Claiming at 62

Claiming at 62 locks in a smaller check for life. For workers born in 1960 or later, full retirement age (FRA) is 67, which means filing at 62 is five years early. The Social Security Administration applies a tiered reduction that totals roughly 30% below the FRA benefit. Waiting past FRA earns an additional 8% per year through age 70, meaning a worker who delays to 70 collects 124% of the FRA amount.

If his full retirement age benefit would be about $2,400 a month, claiming at 62 drops that to roughly $1,680. The gap is around $720 a month, or close to $8,600 a year, permanently removed from his baseline. Every future cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) applies to that reduced base, so the shortfall compounds in dollar terms over time. The 2026 COLA came in at 2.8%, and even a modest annual adjustment like that widens the gap by a larger dollar amount each passing year.

The 8% annual credit for delaying past FRA is unusually generous compared with what safe money earns anywhere else. The 10-year Treasury note currently yields approximately 4.8%, and the FDIC-reported national average on a 12-month CD sits at just 1.71%. Against either benchmark, spending 401(k) money to let Social Security grow looks like buying a larger inflation-adjusted lifetime income stream at a rate no bank will match.

The core tradeoff is straightforward to frame, even when it is hard to resolve: claim now for immediate cash flow and preserve the 401(k), or spend from the 401(k) as a bridge and let the future benefit compound to a permanently higher base.

Health Coverage Is the Hidden Anchor

Medicare eligibility does not begin until 65, leaving a three-year coverage gap to fill. Private coverage through COBRA or an ACA marketplace plan can range from a few hundred dollars a month to well over a thousand, depending on income-based subsidies. This is exactly where the two decisions collide. Claiming Social Security raises reported income, which reduces marketplace premium tax credits. That interaction alone has reversed many early-claim decisions once someone actually runs the numbers.

Unemployment benefits in Illinois can help cover living costs while he weighs retraining or a lower-paying bridge job. One critical wrinkle for anyone considering a bridge job: in 2026, Social Security withholds $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above $24,480 annually for beneficiaries who remain below FRA for the full calendar year. That earnings cap can effectively cancel most or all of an early benefit check for someone who also works part-time. The silver lining is that withheld amounts are not lost permanently. Once a worker reaches FRA, Social Security recalculates the monthly benefit upward to credit the months that were withheld.

Illinois ranks in the bottom third on overall tax competitiveness, coming in at 38th overall, but the state fully exempts all retirement income from state income tax. Social Security benefits, 401(k) withdrawals, IRA distributions, and pension income all escape Illinois’s 4.95% flat rate. For someone living off a combination of those sources during the bridge years, that exemption is a meaningful advantage. Once Medicare kicks in at 65, the standard Part B premium of $202.90 per month in 2026 becomes the baseline cost for medical coverage, up from $185.00 in 2025.

At an employee-owned company, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) is a separate vehicle from a 401(k). The ESOP holds company stock and typically distributes on a schedule after separation, while a 401(k) is portable and can be rolled into an IRA immediately. If he holds both, the ESOP payout timing, the concentrated stock exposure, and any associated tax treatment deserve a close look before making broader income decisions.

What to Weigh Before Filing

Two decisions carry more weight than everything else on the table.

  1. Run the health insurance numbers first. Get an ACA marketplace quote at the lower reported income that comes from living on 401(k) withdrawals, then compare it against a quote that includes Social Security income. The subsidy difference often exceeds the monthly benefit itself, and that gap can swing the entire analysis.
  2. Treat claiming age as the one decision that is hardest to undo. A part-time job, a rollover, even a retraining program can all be adjusted later. A reduced benefit claimed at 62 follows him for 25 or 30 years, and it shapes the survivor benefit available to a spouse as well.

The right sequence is clear: price the health coverage first, understand what early claiming permanently costs, and only then decide how hard the 401(k) has to work as a bridge. Individual health, family longevity, and spouse benefits can each tilt the math, so the arithmetic is worth revisiting with a financial planner who can see the full picture.

Editor’s note: This pass updated the 10-year Treasury yield to approximately 4.8% based on September 2026 market data, refined the FDIC national 12-month CD average to 1.71% per August 2026 FDIC figures, and added context on how Social Security withholds benefits for pre-FRA workers who earn above the $24,480 earnings test limit are not permanently lost but restored through a higher monthly payment at FRA.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Gerelyn Terzo

Gerelyn Terzo is the author of dividend investing handbook "Dividend Investing Strategies: How to Have Your Cake & Eat It Too." A veteran financial journalist, she covers agri-finance for outlets like Global AgInvesting and the broader stock market and personal finance for 24/7 Wall Street. She began at CNBC and later helped launch Fox Business in New York. Gerelyn currently resides in Woodland Park, Colorado and dabbles in nature photography as a hobby.

All articles →