Laid Off at 62 From an Employee-Owned Steel Mill: Should He Claim Social Security or Spend the 401(k) First?

Photo of Gerelyn Terzo
By Gerelyn Terzo Published

Quick Read

  • Claiming Social Security at 62 permanently cuts benefits by up to 30%, potentially erasing $8,600 a year for life as COLA widens the gap.

  • Claiming Social Security raises reported income, which can shrink ACA marketplace subsidies. This hidden cost often outweighs the monthly benefit gained.

  • Waiting until 70 grows Social Security benefits 8% per year, a return that outpaces the 10-year Treasury yield of roughly 4.5%.

  • Are you ahead, or behind on retirement? SmartAsset's free tool can match you with a financial advisor in minutes to help you answer that today. Each advisor has been carefully vetted, and must act in your best interests. Don't waste another minute; learn more here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Laid Off at 62 From an Employee-Owned Steel Mill: Should He Claim Social Security or Spend the 401(k) First?

© 24/7 Wall St.

The morning shift shows up. The gate is locked. Word spreads by phone that the mill is done. That is roughly how it went for the roughly 253 workers at an employee-owned Illinois steel mill whose closure sent longtime employees home with intact retirement accounts and unanswered questions. Local agencies arranged unemployment help, retraining, and manufacturer connections, but none of that answers the question keeping a 62-year-old up at night: turn on Social Security now, or live off the 401(k) until the checks are bigger?

He is 62, earned $75,000 a year running equipment, has roughly $420,000 in a 401(k), no retiree medical, and three years until Medicare eligibility at 65. On forums where displaced steel and auto workers trade notes, the same question keeps surfacing: is it smarter to take the reduced check now, or drain savings and let the benefit grow? There is no clean answer, but there is a clear way to think about it.

The Permanent Cost of Claiming at 62

Claiming at age 62 locks in a smaller check for life. Filing before full retirement age (FRA) can decrease the benefit by up to 30% at age 62. Waiting past FRA adds roughly 8% per year up to age 70.

If his full retirement age benefit would be about $2,400 a month, claiming at 62 drops that toward roughly $1,680. That is around $720 a month, or close to $8,600 a year, gone every year for the rest of his life. Every future cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), which was 2.8% for 2026, is applied to the smaller base, so the gap widens over time.

The 8% annual boost for waiting is unusually generous compared with what safe money earns elsewhere. The 10-year Treasury yields about 4.5%, and the national average 12-month CD pays about 1.7%. Spending some 401(k) money to let Social Security grow is, in effect, buying a bigger inflation-adjusted lifetime income stream at a rate no bank will match.

The core trade: claim now for cash flow and preserve the 401(k), or spend the 401(k) as a bridge and let the future benefit compound.

Health Coverage Is the Hidden Anchor

He cannot touch Medicare until age 65. Three years of private coverage through COBRA or an ACA marketplace plan can easily run anywhere from a few hundred to well over a thousand dollars a month, depending on subsidies tied to his income. Claiming Social Security raises that reported income, which can shrink marketplace subsidies. That interaction alone has flipped many early-claim decisions.

Unemployment benefits in Illinois can cover part of the gap while he considers retraining or a lower-paying bridge job. Illinois ranks in the bottom third on tax competitiveness, coming in at 38th overall, and it does not tax Social Security or most retirement income at the state level. Once Medicare kicks in at 65, the standard Part B premium of $202.90 in 2026 becomes the new baseline.

At an employee-owned company, an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) is not the same as a 401(k). The ESOP holds company stock and typically pays out on a schedule after separation. A 401(k) is his money, portable, and can be rolled to an IRA. If he has both, the ESOP payout timing and any concentrated stock risk deserve their own look.

What to Weigh Before Filing

Two decisions carry more weight than everything else on the table.

  1. Run the health insurance numbers first. Get an ACA quote at a lower reported income (living off 401(k) withdrawals) and compare it against a quote that includes Social Security. The subsidy difference often exceeds the monthly benefit itself.
  2. Treat claiming age as the one decision that is hardest to undo. A part-time job, a rollover, even a retraining program can be adjusted later. A reduced benefit at 62 follows him for 25 or 30 years, and it follows a surviving spouse too.

The right sequence is clear: price the health coverage, understand what an early claim permanently costs, and only then decide how hard the 401(k) has to work as a bridge. Individual health, family longevity, and spouse benefits can tilt the math in either direction, so the arithmetic is worth redoing with a planner who sees the whole picture.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Gerelyn Terzo
About the Author Gerelyn Terzo →

Gerelyn Terzo is the author of dividend investing handbook "Dividend Investing Strategies: How to Have Your Cake & Eat It Too." A veteran financial journalist, she covers agri-finance for outlets like Global AgInvesting and the broader stock market and personal finance for 24/7 Wall Street. She began at CNBC and later helped launch Fox Business in New York. Gerelyn currently resides in Woodland Park, Colorado and dabbles in nature photography as a hobby.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

SMCI Vol: 49,680,587
DELL Vol: 1,537,967
CME Vol: 533,468
GM Vol: 1,915,203

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
TEL Vol: 1,660,034
GEV Vol: 1,341,467
DASH Vol: 548,268
DDOG Vol: 554,566