Of all the most serious crimes tracked by the FBI — known as Part I offenses — larceny is by far the most common. There were 4.6 million cases of larceny-theft reported in the United States in 2020, accounting for nearly 60% of all Part I offenses, which also include murder, assault, robbery, rаpe, vehicle theft, and burglary.
Larceny is a classification of crime that includes all nonviolent theft, with the exception of motor vehicle theft. Common examples of larceny include purse snatching, pick pocketing, shoplifting, and bicycle theft. According to the most recent available estimates from the FBI, larceny-thefts result in an estimated $5.9 billion in losses to victims annually.
Though larceny-theft is relatively widespread in the United States, there are parts of the country where such crimes are not especially common and residents are at far lower risk of being the victim of theft than the typical American.
Using data from the FBI’s 2020 Uniform Crime Report, 24/7 Wall St. identified the metro area with the lowest larceny-theft rate in every state. Metropolitan areas are ranked by the number of larcenies reported for every 100,000 people.
It is important to note that in eight states, there is only one eligible metro area with available data. In each of these cases, which are noted, the metro area listed ranks as having the lowest larceny-theft rate by default only. In three states — Alabama, Illinois, and Pennsylvania — there are no qualifying metro areas with available crime data.
Though each of the metro areas on this list ranks as having the lowest larceny theft rate in its respective state, larceny rates in these places vary considerably, from 486 incidents per 100,000 people to 2,523 per 100,000. Still, in the majority of the metro areas on this list, larceny theft rates are below the statewide rate as well as the national rate of 1,398 per 100,000.
Larceny, along with burglary and vehicle theft, is one of three criminal offenses that make up the property crime category. Due in large part to lower than average larceny rates, in most metro areas on this list, the overall property crime rate is lower than the comparable statewide rate. Here is a look at the city with the fewest property crimes in every state.
Click here to see the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts in every state
Click here to see our detailed methodology
Source: BlazenImages / Getty Images
Alabama: No eligible metros
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: N/A (Alabama: 1,515.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: N/A (Alabama: 74,575)
> Property crimes per 100K people: N/A (Alabama: 2,136.8)
> Total property crimes: N/A (Alabama: 105,161)
> Population: N/A
[in-text-ad]
Source: Chilkoot / Getty Images
Alaska: Anchorage
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 2,523.4 (Alaska: 1,611.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 7,703 (Alaska: 11,784)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 3,404.7 (Alaska: 2,260.5)
> Total property crimes: 10,393 (Alaska: 16,528)
> Population: 396,317
Source: equigini / iStock via Getty Images
Arizona: Prescott Valley-Prescott
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 917.8 (Arizona: 1,656.0)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,195 (Arizona: 122,898)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,216.8 (Arizona: 2,227.7)
> Total property crimes: 2,910 (Arizona: 165,323)
> Population: 235,099
Source: BOB WESTON / iStock via Getty Images
Arkansas: Jonesboro
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,681.2 (Arkansas: 1,828.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,276 (Arkansas: 55,413)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,928.1 (Arkansas: 2,613.4)
> Total property crimes: 3,964 (Arkansas: 79,200)
> Population: 133,860
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: garytog / iStock via Getty Images
California: Madera
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 849.4 (California: 1,341.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,329 (California: 528,202)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,362.6 (California: 2,138.9)
> Total property crimes: 2,132 (California: 842,054)
> Population: 157,327
Source: marekuliasz / iStock via Getty Images
Colorado: Greeley
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,532.2 (Colorado: 1,909.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 5,076 (Colorado: 110,884)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,162.8 (Colorado: 2,833.8)
> Total property crimes: 7,165 (Colorado: 164,582)
> Population: 324,492
[in-text-ad]
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
Connecticut: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 863.4 (Connecticut: 1,141.2)
> Total larceny-thefts: 8,017 (Connecticut: 40,592)
> Property crimes per 100K people: N/A (Connecticut: 1,565.1)
> Total property crimes: N/A (Connecticut: 55,670)
> Population: 943,332
Source: aimintang / Getty Images
Delaware: Dover
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,540.2 (Delaware: 1,538.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,829 (Delaware: 15,182)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,853.3 (Delaware: 1,961.4)
> Total property crimes: 3,404 (Delaware: 19,355)
> Population: 180,786
*Because Dover is the only eligible metro in Delaware, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
Source: Michael Warren / Getty Images
Florida: The Villages
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 485.7 (Florida: 1,352.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 666 (Florida: 293,992)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 705.3 (Florida: 1,769.4)
> Total property crimes: 967 (Florida: 384,556)
> Population: 132,420
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: BOB WESTON / Getty Images
Georgia: Gainesville
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 967.6 (Georgia: 1,478.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,003 (Georgia: 158,343)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,270.9 (Georgia: 2,007.4)
> Total property crimes: 2,631 (Georgia: 214,988)
> Population: 204,441
Source: Art Wager / E+ via Getty Images
Hawaii: Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,562.4 (Hawaii: 1,702.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,612 (Hawaii: 23,954)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,115.7 (Hawaii: 2,411.4)
> Total property crimes: 3,537 (Hawaii: 33,928)
> Population: 167,488
*Because Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina is the only eligible metro in Hawaii, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
[in-text-ad]
Source: DavidByronKeener / Getty Images
Idaho: Idaho Falls
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 801.7 (Idaho: 810.9)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,241 (Idaho: 14,815)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,288.2 (Idaho: 1,111.9)
> Total property crimes: 1,994 (Idaho: 20,313)
> Population: 151,516
24/7 Wall St.
Source: dszc / Getty Images
Illinois: No eligible metros
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: N/A (Illinois: 1,143.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: N/A (Illinois: 143,935)
> Property crimes per 100K people: N/A (Illinois: 1,559.4)
> Total property crimes: N/A (Illinois: 196,287)
> Population: N/A
Indiana: Kokomo
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,131.7 (Indiana: 1,274.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 933 (Indiana: 86,080)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,592.6 (Indiana: 1,783.2)
> Total property crimes: 1,313 (Indiana: 120,453)
> Population: 82,544
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: cosmonaut / Getty Images
Iowa: Dubuque
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,029.2 (Iowa: 1,130.1)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,004 (Iowa: 35,751)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,397.2 (Iowa: 1,698.2)
> Total property crimes: 1,363 (Iowa: 53,725)
> Population: 97,311
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Kansas: Manhattan
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,272.6 (Kansas: 1,619.6)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,658 (Kansas: 47,193)
> Property crimes per 100K people: N/A (Kansas: 2,199.1)
> Total property crimes: N/A (Kansas: 64,077)
> Population: 130,285
*Because Manhattan is the only eligible metro in Kansas, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
[in-text-ad]
Kentucky: Elizabethtown-Fort Knox
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 542.0 (Kentucky: 1,178.6)
> Total larceny-thefts: 836 (Kentucky: 52,769)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 833.8 (Kentucky: 1,779.5)
> Total property crimes: 1,286 (Kentucky: 79,673)
> Population: 154,713
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Louisiana: Lafayette
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,764.1 (Louisiana: 2,107.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 8,644 (Louisiana: 97,891)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,487.4 (Louisiana: 2,884.4)
> Total property crimes: 12,188 (Louisiana: 133,989)
> Population: 489,207
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
Maine: Portland-South Portland
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 854.8 (Maine: 943.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 4,641 (Maine: 12,739)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,017.5 (Maine: 1,156.2)
> Total property crimes: 5,524 (Maine: 15,610)
> Population: 538,500
[in-text-ad-2]
Maryland: California-Lexington Park
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,064.6 (Maryland: 1,184.9)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,214 (Maryland: 71,757)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,364.5 (Maryland: 1,609.8)
> Total property crimes: 1,556 (Maryland: 97,487)
> Population: 113,510
*Because California-Lexington Park is the only eligible metro in Maryland, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
Massachusetts: Barnstable Town
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 608.9 (Massachusetts: 804.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,288 (Massachusetts: 55,444)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 817.8 (Massachusetts: 1,053.2)
> Total property crimes: 1,730 (Massachusetts: 72,602)
> Population: 212,990
[in-text-ad]
Source: ShriramPatki / Getty Images
Michigan: Midland
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 556.6 (Michigan: 943.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 461 (Michigan: 94,017)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 700.3 (Michigan: 1,360.9)
> Total property crimes: 580 (Michigan: 135,633)
> Population: 83,156
Source: Andy445 / Getty Images
Minnesota: Rochester
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,030.4 (Minnesota: 1,567.8)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,296 (Minnesota: 88,696)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,364.8 (Minnesota: 2,124.9)
> Total property crimes: 3,041 (Minnesota: 120,212)
> Population: 221,921
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Mississippi: Hattiesburg
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,601.2 (Mississippi: 1,408.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,705 (Mississippi: 41,780)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,215.6 (Mississippi: 2,101.6)
> Total property crimes: 3,743 (Mississippi: 62,351)
> Population: 168,469
*Because Hattiesburg is the only eligible metro in Mississippi, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: gnagel / Getty Images
Missouri: Jefferson City
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,173.2 (Missouri: 1,759.1)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,775 (Missouri: 108,209)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,629.2 (Missouri: 2,531.0)
> Total property crimes: 2,465 (Missouri: 155,698)
> Population: 151,418
Source: akpakp / Getty Images
Montana: Missoula
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 2,058.7 (Montana: 1,603.0)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,492 (Montana: 17,322)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,544.5 (Montana: 2,120.8)
> Total property crimes: 3,080 (Montana: 22,917)
> Population: 119,600
[in-text-ad]
Source: Cheri Alguire / iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Nebraska: Grand Island
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,445.3 (Nebraska: 1,418.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,091 (Nebraska: 27,488)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,832.2 (Nebraska: 1,909.2)
> Total property crimes: 1,383 (Nebraska: 36,991)
> Population: 75,553
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Nevada: Carson City
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 704.0 (Nevada: 1,221.4)
> Total larceny-thefts: 396 (Nevada: 38,332)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,143.1 (Nevada: 1,926.6)
> Total property crimes: 643 (Nevada: 60,462)
> Population: 55,916
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
New Hampshire: Manchester-Nashua
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 944.8 (New Hampshire: 919.1)
> Total larceny-thefts: 3,962 (New Hampshire: 12,558)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,138.0 (New Hampshire: 1,098.9)
> Total property crimes: 4,772 (New Hampshire: 15,014)
> Population: 417,025
*Because Manchester-Nashua is the only eligible metro in New Hampshire, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: ChrisBoswell / iStock via Getty Images
New Jersey: Trenton-Princeton
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 977.4 (New Jersey: 896.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 3,587 (New Jersey: 79,614)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,337.9 (New Jersey: 1,158.2)
> Total property crimes: 4,910 (New Jersey: 102,875)
> Population: 367,430
Source: KaraGrubis / iStock via Getty Images
New Mexico: Farmington
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,110.8 (New Mexico: 1,765.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,373 (New Mexico: 37,188)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,639.1 (New Mexico: 2,841.9)
> Total property crimes: 2,026 (New Mexico: 59,859)
> Population: 123,958
[in-text-ad]
Source: Ashley Freiheit / Getty Images
New York: Glens Falls
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 606.0 (New York: 1,143.6)
> Total larceny-thefts: 751 (New York: 221,129)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 737.5 (New York: 1,410.7)
> Total property crimes: 914 (New York: 272,788)
> Population: 125,148
24/7 Wall St.
Source: Darwin Brandis / Getty Images
North Carolina: Jacksonville
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,122.3 (North Carolina: 1,561.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,236 (North Carolina: 165,554)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,581.6 (North Carolina: 2,226.5)
> Total property crimes: 3,151 (North Carolina: 236,026)
> Population: 197,938
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
North Dakota: Grand Forks
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,296.5 (North Dakota: 1,435.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,299 (North Dakota: 10,986)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,758.7 (North Dakota: 2,124.1)
> Total property crimes: 1,762 (North Dakota: 16,256)
> Population: 100,815
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: pawel.gaul / E+ via Getty Images
Ohio: Cleveland-Elyria
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,169.7 (Ohio: 1,359.8)
> Total larceny-thefts: 23,896 (Ohio: 159,007)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,704.5 (Ohio: 1,850.3)
> Total property crimes: 34,823 (Ohio: 216,363)
> Population: 2,048,449
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Oklahoma: Lawton
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,036.8 (Oklahoma: 1,714.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,305 (Oklahoma: 68,243)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,861.6 (Oklahoma: 2,705.6)
> Total property crimes: 2,343 (Oklahoma: 107,705)
> Population: 126,043
[in-text-ad]
Oregon: Grants Pass
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,193.2 (Oregon: 1,928.8)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,045 (Oregon: 81,811)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,712.8 (Oregon: 2,659.0)
> Total property crimes: 1,500 (Oregon: 112,782)
> Population: 87,487
Source: AndreyKrav / Getty Images
Pennsylvania: No eligible metros
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: N/A (Pennsylvania: 1,274.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: N/A (Pennsylvania: 162,919)
> Property crimes per 100K people: N/A (Pennsylvania: 1,644.1)
> Total property crimes: N/A (Pennsylvania: 210,167)
> Population: N/A
Source: SeanPavonePhoto / iStock via Getty Images
Rhode Island: Providence-Warwick
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 863.3 (Rhode Island: 935.9)
> Total larceny-thefts: 13,995 (Rhode Island: 9,894)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,160.2 (Rhode Island: 1,245.5)
> Total property crimes: 18,808 (Rhode Island: 13,166)
> Population: 1,624,578
*Because Providence-Warwick is the only eligible metro in Rhode Island, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
South Carolina: Hilton Head Island-Bluffton
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,138.3 (South Carolina: 1,991.0)
> Total larceny-thefts: 2,580 (South Carolina: 103,892)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,479.8 (South Carolina: 2,721.1)
> Total property crimes: 3,354 (South Carolina: 141,987)
> Population: 222,195
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
South Dakota: Sioux Falls
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,747.6 (South Dakota: 1,357.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 4,771 (South Dakota: 12,117)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,524.2 (South Dakota: 1,956.7)
> Total property crimes: 6,891 (South Dakota: 17,468)
> Population: 268,833
[in-text-ad]
Source: Dee / iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Tennessee: Morristown
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,324.8 (Tennessee: 1,802.0)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,900 (Tennessee: 124,098)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,872.9 (Tennessee: 2,492.8)
> Total property crimes: 2,686 (Tennessee: 171,675)
> Population: 142,749
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
Texas: El Paso
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 962.0 (Texas: 1,587.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 8,134 (Texas: 466,033)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,148.2 (Texas: 2,245.0)
> Total property crimes: 9,708 (Texas: 659,160)
> Population: 843,725
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
Utah: Logan
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 605.6 (Utah: 1,857.3)
> Total larceny-thefts: 871 (Utah: 60,359)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 798.2 (Utah: 2,464.4)
> Total property crimes: 1,148 (Utah: 80,091)
> Population: 141,760
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: SeanPavonePhoto / iStock via Getty Images
Vermont: Burlington-South Burlington
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,408.4 (Vermont: 1,020.5)
> Total larceny-thefts: 3,116 (Vermont: 6,361)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,609.5 (Vermont: 1,217.0)
> Total property crimes: 3,561 (Vermont: 7,586)
> Population: 219,433
*Because Burlington-South Burlington is the only eligible metro in Vermont, it is the metro with the fewest larceny-thefts by default.
Source: BOB WESTON / Getty Images
Virginia: Harrisonburg
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 783.3 (Virginia: 1,196.6)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,065 (Virginia: 102,796)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 981.9 (Virginia: 1,456.4)
> Total property crimes: 1,335 (Virginia: 125,114)
> Population: 134,964
[in-text-ad]
Source: Erhoman / Getty Images
Washington: Wenatchee
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 848.2 (Washington: 1,854.2)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,029 (Washington: 142,657)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,147.4 (Washington: 2,732.4)
> Total property crimes: 1,392 (Washington: 210,223)
> Population: 120,629
Source: DavidByronKeener / iStock via Getty Images
West Virginia: Wheeling
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 733.4 (West Virginia: 998.9)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,011 (West Virginia: 17,828)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 1,032.2 (West Virginia: 1,399.4)
> Total property crimes: 1,423 (West Virginia: 24,976)
> Population: 138,948
Source: Serenethos / iStock Editorial via Getty Images
Wisconsin: Wausau-Weston
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 701.0 (Wisconsin: 1,106.1)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,144 (Wisconsin: 64,517)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 911.2 (Wisconsin: 1,485.7)
> Total property crimes: 1,487 (Wisconsin: 86,654)
> Population: 163,285
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: DenisTangneyJr / E+ via Getty Images
Wyoming: Casper
> 2020 larceny-thefts per 100K people: 1,819.5 (Wyoming: 1,234.7)
> Total larceny-thefts: 1,467 (Wyoming: 7,190)
> Property crimes per 100K people: 2,423.6 (Wyoming: 1,610.6)
> Total property crimes: 1,954 (Wyoming: 9,379)
> Population: 79,858
Methodology
To determine the metro area with the lowest larceny-theft rate in every state, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed larceny-theft figures from the FBI’s 2020 Uniform Crime Report.
Limited data was available in the 2020 UCR for areas in Alabama, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Illinois, though these states were not excluded from analysis. Only metro areas for which the boundaries defined by the FBI match the boundaries as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau were considered.
Data for property crime — a category that includes larceny-theft, burglary, and motor vehicle theft — also came from the 2020 FBI UCR. Population figures are one-year estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 American Community Survey. However, these estimates were not used to calculate crime rates. Crime rates per 100,000 people were calculated using population figures provided by the FBI in the 2020 UCR.
Take This Retirement Quiz To Get Matched With A Financial Advisor (Sponsored)
Take the quiz below to get matched with a financial advisor today.
Each advisor has been vetted by SmartAsset and is held to a fiduciary standard to act in your best interests.
Here’s how it works:
1. Answer SmartAsset advisor match quiz
2. Review your pre-screened matches at your leisure. Check out the
advisors’ profiles.
3. Speak with advisors at no cost to you. Have an introductory call on the phone or introduction in person and choose whom to work with in the future
Take the retirement quiz right here.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
