Among the most important aims of the Biden administration’s legislative agenda is to fix – which usually means to update and replace – vast portions of the nation’s infrastructure. This includes a wide array of projects, such as highways, broadband systems — and bridges. Bridges are at different states of disrepair nationwide, and the state with the most dangerous bridges is West Virginia. (This state has the worst highways in America.)
The bipartisan infrastructure bill (Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act) has paved a way for the Biden administration’s goals to be met. The cornerstones of the ambitious plan are the $52.5 billion in federal highway apportionment and the $27 billion in funding to replace, repair, and rehabilitate bridges announced by the U.S. Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration.
One of the most pressing problems is that bridges are wearing out faster than expected due to “Deferred maintenance, climate change and heavier-than-anticipated traffic,” according to Axios.
Many estimates of the cost to repair America’s bridges are much larger than the money the administration provided in the bill. The American Road & Transportation Builders Association analyzed the Transportation Department’s 2021 National Bridge Inventory and found that 36% of America’s bridges need major repair work. The organization’s total bridge count nationwide is 619,588. Of these, 43,578 are in a dangerous state and need to be repaired or replaced immediately.
24/7 Wall St. reviewed the association’s 2022 Bridge Report to find the states with the most dangerous bridges. The report notes bridges that are particularly dangerous. States were ranked by the percent of bridges that are structurally deficient. Data is from the report.Â
The state with the most structurally deficient bridges is Iowa with 4,504, which represents 18.9% of its 23,870 bridges. Only one state has a higher percentage of structurally deficient bridges. In West Virginia, 20.5% of bridges are structurally deficient, but the raw figure is 1,490, much lower than Iowa’s count.
To illustrate how bad the Iowa and West Virginia numbers are, note that the three states with the lowest percentage of structurally deficient bridges are Arizona, Texas, and Nevada at 1.4%, and the number of structurally deficient bridges are 117, 789, and 29, respectively. (This is the worst city to drive in every state.)
Click here to see the state with the most dangerous bridges
Source: Dreamframer / iStock via Getty Images
50. Arizona
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 1.4%
>Number of bridges: 8,467
[in-text-ad]
Source: photoquest7 / iStock via Getty Images
49. Nevada
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 1.4%
>Number of bridges: 2,067
Source: Barbara Smyers / iStock via Getty Images
48. Texas
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 1.4%
>Number of bridges: 55,175
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
47. Delaware
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 1.9%
>Number of bridges: 875
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
46. Utah
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 2.1%
>Number of bridges: 3,056
Source: SeanPavonePhoto / iStock via Getty Images
45. Georgia
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 2.1%
>Number of bridges: 14,987
[in-text-ad]
Source: haveseen / iStock via Getty Images
44. Vermont
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 2.4%
>Number of bridges: 2,836
24/7 Wall St.
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
43. Florida
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 3.6%
>Number of bridges: 12,680
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
42. Alabama
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 3.6%
>Number of bridges: 16,164
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
41. Virginia
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 3.8%
>Number of bridges: 13,997
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
40. Tennessee
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.1%
>Number of bridges: 20,331
[in-text-ad]
Source: Davel5957 / E+ via Getty Images
39. Minnesota
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.6%
>Number of bridges: 13,496
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
38. Oregon
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.6%
>Number of bridges: 8,235
Source: ymn / iStock via Getty Images
37. Maryland
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.7%
>Number of bridges: 5,446
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: aiisha5 / iStock via Getty Images
36. Washington
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.8%
>Number of bridges: 8,358
Source: espiegle / iStock via Getty Images
35. Ohio
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 4.9%
>Number of bridges: 27,151
[in-text-ad]
Source: TriggerPhoto / iStock via Getty Images
34. Kansas
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.1%
>Number of bridges: 24,925
24/7 Wall St.
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
33. New Mexico
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.2%
>Number of bridges: 4,025
Source: vkbhat / E+ via Getty Images
32. Idaho
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.2%
>Number of bridges: 4,561
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
31. Arkansas
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.3%
>Number of bridges: 12,941
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
30. Colorado
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.3%
>Number of bridges: 8,869
[in-text-ad]
Source: Jon Bilous / iStock via Getty Images
29. Connecticut
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.3%
>Number of bridges: 4,361
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
28. South Carolina
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.3%
>Number of bridges: 9,395
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
27. Indiana
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.6%
>Number of bridges: 19,337
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: bluejayphoto / iStock via Getty Images
26. California
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 5.8%
>Number of bridges: 25,737
Source: alexeys / iStock via Getty Images
25. Kentucky
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 6.9%
>Number of bridges: 14,410
[in-text-ad]
Source: JamesBrey / E+ via Getty Images
24. Wisconsin
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 6.9%
>Number of bridges: 14,307
Source: peeterv / iStock via Getty Images
23. Montana
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 6.9%
>Number of bridges: 5,266
Source: Tiago_Fernandez / iStock via Getty Images
22. Mississippi
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.0%
>Number of bridges: 16,788
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
21. North Carolina
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.0%
>Number of bridges: 18,877
Source: Ultima_Gaina / iStock via Getty Images
20. New Jersey
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.1%
>Number of bridges: 6,798
[in-text-ad]
Source: DenisTangneyJr / E+ via Getty Images
19. Wyoming
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.4%
>Number of bridges: 3,114
Source: okimo / iStock via Getty Images
18. Hawaii
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.5%
>Number of bridges: 1,162
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
17. New Hampshire
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 7.7%
>Number of bridges: 2,527
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: sorincolac / iStock via Getty Images
16. Alaska
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 8.2%
>Number of bridges: 1,632
Source: Davel5957 / iStock via Getty Images
15. Nebraska
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 8.3%
>Number of bridges: 15,348
[in-text-ad]
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
14. Massachusetts
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 8.7%
>Number of bridges: 5,245
Source: JaySi / iStock via Getty Images
13. Illinois
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 9.0%
>Number of bridges: 26,846
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
12. Missouri
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 9.0%
>Number of bridges: 24,590
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: GCShutter / E+ via Getty Images
11. New York
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 9.5%
>Number of bridges: 17,555
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
10. Oklahoma
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 9.9%
>Number of bridges: 23,220
[in-text-ad]
Source: pawel.gaul / E+ via Getty Images
9. Michigan
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 11.0%
>Number of bridges: 11,284
Source: rruntsch / iStock via Getty Images
8. North Dakota
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 11.2%
>Number of bridges: 4,285
Source: Ultima_Gaina / iStock via Getty Images
7. Maine
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 12.6%
>Number of bridges: 2,485
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Kruck20 / iStock via Getty Images
6. Louisiana
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 12.8%
>Number of bridges: 12,782
Source: Ultima_Gaina / iStock via Getty Images
5. Pennsylvania
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 13.8%
>Number of bridges: 23,166
[in-text-ad]
Source: DenisTangneyJr / iStock via Getty Images
4. South Dakota
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 17.3%
>Number of bridges: 5,886
Source: nikon401 / E+ via Getty Images
3. Rhode Island
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 17.5%
>Number of bridges: 779
Source: pabradyphoto / iStock via Getty Images
2. Iowa
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 18.9%
>Number of bridges: 23,870
[in-text-ad-2]
Source: Sean Pavone / iStock via Getty Images
1. West Virginia
>Percent of bridges that are structurally deficient: 20.4%
>Number of bridges: 7,314
Essential Tips for Investing: Sponsored
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Thank you for reading! Have some feedback for us?
Contact the 24/7 Wall St. editorial team.
Editors' Picks
