Holders of CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD | CRWD Price Prediction) own the household name in cybersecurity, and the stock has rewarded that conviction with a 45.26% year-to-date gain through June 23. The catch is concentration. A single Falcon sensor incident in July 2024 still drags litigation costs across CrowdStrike’s results. The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (NASDAQ:CIBR) keeps CrowdStrike as its second-largest position while spreading the rest of the bet across the full cybersecurity stack, capturing the same AI-era demand story without binary single-stock outcomes.
The Case for Holding CRWD
If you look at the fundamentals, the ownership case makes a lot of sense. Revenue for the first quarter of fiscal 2027 came in at $1.39 billion, which is up 25.57% year over year, and non-GAAP earnings per share of $1.10 extended the beat streak to eight consecutive quarters. Total annual recurring revenue reached $5.51 billion, while free cash flow margin expanded to 34%. Management also raised revenue guidance for fiscal 2027 to a range of $5.91 billion to $5.96 billion, and a four-for-one stock split is set to take effect on July 2, 2026.
Where the Concentration Bites
The stock trades at 137x forward earnings with a price-to-sales ratio of 34. CrowdStrike still books $317.6 million in quarterly stock-based compensation and continues to absorb litigation costs from the 2024 outage. Reddit sentiment turned bearish across the stock market and stocks subreddits after the most recent beat, with users flagging operating expense growth even as results topped consensus. A single disappointment at premium multiples hits the full position.
What CIBR Owns and What It Costs
CIBR runs at a 0.58% expense ratio and holds 51 positions. As of June 21, 2026, CrowdStrike is the second-largest holding at 10.23%, behind Palo Alto Networks (NASDAQ:PANW) at 10.71% and ahead of Fortinet (NASDAQ:FTNT) at 8.41%. Cloudflare holds 3.71%, and Zscaler sits in the top ten at 3.65%.
The basket is up 18.06% year-to-date and 15.2% over one year. Peer results validate the sector tailwind: Palo Alto posted Q3 FY26 revenue of $3.00 billion (+31.1% YoY), and Fortinet delivered Q1 FY26 product revenue growth of 41%. Year-to-date, PANW is up 57.93%, and FTNT is up 86.37%, both outpacing CrowdStrike. Owning CIBR captures that peer leverage across the cybersecurity stack.
The Tradeoffs Worth Naming
This particular ETF is concentrated rather than broadly diversified across the space. The top five holdings, which include names like Cisco and Broadcom, account for roughly 45% of total assets, and there is meaningful infrastructure exposure beyond just pure-play cybersecurity names.
One holding, Zscaler, really illustrates the defensive value of the basket: that stock dropped 43.9% year to date despite beating earnings every single quarter, but holders of the ETF absorbed that collapse at a small weight rather than taking full exposure. The 0.58% fee does add up on top of zero-cost direct ownership, and the fund trails another well-known name in the space by roughly 27 percentage points so far this year. In the end, you are trading away upside potential in exchange for some reduction in downside risk.
How to Approach the Switch
In a taxable account, selling CrowdStrike at current prices would trigger capital gains on a position that has appreciated substantially for most holders, while a tax-advantaged account would carry no such friction. Partial-rotation scenarios let holders retain CRWD exposure while reducing single-name concentration.
A partial trim of 25%-50% into CIBR captures diversification while preserving direct upside in CRWD. Investors who specifically believe CrowdStrike will continue beating the cybersecurity basket have a reason to hold; investors uncomfortable owning the full position through a second Falcon-style event have a specific, low-cost vehicle that retains CrowdStrike as a top holding while spreading exposure across the rest of the stack.
Reading the Setup From Here
CrowdStrike’s fundamentals continue to compound, and CIBR does not outperform it in the current window. The argument for the basket rests on the risk shape. Holders who would lose sleep over a repeat operational event have a concrete alternative at 0.58% annually that still rides the AI-cybersecurity demand wave through every major name in the sector.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks