“Compute Is the New Oil”: Kalshi Just Launched a Way to Bet on the Future Price of AI Computing Power

Photo of Danielle Liverance
By Danielle Liverance Published

Quick Read

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
“Compute Is the New Oil”: Kalshi Just Launched a Way to Bet on the Future Price of AI Computing Power

© Amal Kamal 17 / Shutterstock.com

Kalshi thinks the most important commodity of the AI era is compute. The CFTC-regulated prediction market just launched what it calls the first market-driven forward curve for GPU computing power, a way to bet on where the price of AI processing is headed.

The product was unveiled in a Bloomberg exclusive by Uday Shah, Kalshi’s newly appointed Chief Risk Officer and a 16-year veteran of CME Group. It plots future prices of computing power and positions Kalshi squarely in a brewing fight with the biggest names in derivatives. Both CME Group (NASDAQ:CME | CME Price Prediction) and Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE:ICE) have announced their own compute futures products.

The Pitch: Compute Is the New Oil

Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour has been direct about the ambition. “Compute is the new oil,” he has said, adding that “compute futures will eventually dwarf oil futures.” The numbers behind the claim are staggering. Hyperscalers have committed “north of $500 to $600 billion just for 2026” to computing infrastructure, according to Kalshi, with total addressable market estimates stretching into the trillions.

The launch follows a May 2024 prediction from BlackRock CEO Larry Fink at the Milken Institute that “a new asset class will be buying futures of compute.” Two years later, that new asset class is being built in real time.

Why Kalshi Thinks It Has an Edge

Shah’s core argument is that the GPU market is fragmented, and the fragmentation is Kalshi’s opportunity. Computing power lacks the standardization of a barrel of oil. Prices vary by chip grade, by location, and by use case, which makes a single clean index hard to pin down. Traditional exchanges focus on specific indices; Kalshi’s prediction-market structure lets it list many contracts simultaneously to capture that fragmentation.

He also draws a sharp line on price discovery. Kalshi’s forward curve is “true market-driven,” built from actual trading, while competing curves lean on OTC deals or bilateral contracts negotiated privately between parties. In a market this new, whose price is the “real” price is a live question.

The Competitive Subplot

A pointed rivalry sits underneath all of this. CME is currently suing the CFTC to block Kalshi’s perpetual futures. Shah’s move is especially loaded: he defected from CME, the very exchange trying to box Kalshi in, to build Kalshi’s compute product. A 16-year CME insider now helping the challenger draw the map is a direct competitive signal.

Both incumbents are already priming the ground. CME reported Q1 2026 revenue of $1.88 billion and record ADV of 36.2 million contracts, with CEO Terry Duffy citing “expanding access through initiatives such as U.S. Treasury clearing, 24/7 cryptocurrency trading and prediction markets” as core growth vectors. ICE posted Q1 2026 revenue of $2.98 billion and last October announced a strategic investment in Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, expanding its footprint into decentralized prediction markets.

Why It Matters for Investors

This is a land grab for what could become an entirely new derivatives category. If Mansour is right, the exchanges that establish standard contracts and capture volume stand to win a durable, high-margin business. CME’s operating margin sits at 69.8%; ICE’s adjusted operating margin expanded to 65% in Q1 2026. That is the prize Kalshi is aiming at.

CME trades near $243.61, down 8.16% year to date, while ICE sits at $137.61, down 14.44% YTD. Both remain the public-market vehicles for exposure to this category. Kalshi, still private, is the disruptor trying to define the standard before the incumbents lock it down.

A caveat: this is early and unproven. A forward curve for compute is only as useful as the liquidity and standardization behind it, and the GPU market has neither in abundance today. New derivatives categories launch frequently, and most never reach the scale their founders promise.

The direction is clear, though. When the CEO of the world’s largest asset manager predicts a new asset class, and a CFTC-regulated market plus the two biggest names in derivatives all race to build it within two years, the question is no longer whether compute becomes a tradable commodity. It’s who owns the market when it does.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Danielle Liverance
About the Author Danielle Liverance →

I've spent more than 15 years inside enterprise software, working alongside the finance, sales operations, and HR leaders who run the revenue engines at some of the largest tech companies in the country.

My day job is helping enterprise executives make smarter decisions about retention, compensation, and growth. These are the same operational levers that show up in every earnings report investors actually read. That perspective shapes my writing for 24/7 Wall St.

The headline numbers are easy. The interesting stuff is underneath: how companies make money, what executives are worried about, and what any of it means for the person checking their 401(k) on a Sunday afternoon. I write about personal finance and business as someone who has spent her career inside the rooms where these decisions get made.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

PYPL Vol: 51,652,655
BLK Vol: 630,365
CBRE Vol: 347,370
KMX Vol: 1,038,303
GPN Vol: 1,056,972

Top Losing Stocks

PNR Vol: 5,700,503
DELL Vol: 4,849,977
ELV Vol: 1,389,411
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
WDC Vol: 2,387,971