New Harbor Financial’s John Llodra used his latest appearance on Adam Taggart’s Thoughtful Money to deliver a stark message to buy-and-hold investors: the setup for a traditional 60/40 stock/bond portfolio looks worse today than at almost any point he can remember.
“I think we’re in one of the most dangerous times in history to be taking that kind of approach,” Loder said, referring to passive indexing across equities and fixed income. His full commentary is available in the segment titled “What’s More Likely: A Rally Or Rout From Here?” on the Thoughtful Money channel.
The 60/40 Math That Worries Loder
Llodra pointed to a chart of real, inflation-adjusted returns to argue that “brief episodes do not mean that they are not hugely damaging.” He cited the dot-com crash, which he pegged at exactly 2 years, and the Global Financial Crisis, which he pegged at 15 months, as drawdowns short enough to feel survivable in hindsight yet long enough to wipe out a full decade of real 60/40 returns.
The bond side of that portfolio is already testing investors. The iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA: AGG) trades near $98 and has delivered roughly flat annualized returns over the past five years and only about 1.5% annually over the past decade on a total-return basis. With the 10-year Treasury yield near 4.58%, well above the levels that prevailed during much of the post-financial-crisis era, the diversification cushion that defined the traditional 60/40 portfolio looks thinner than the label suggests.
The Macro Backdrop Backing His Concern
Llodra’s “dangerous times” framing gets partial support from macro data.
The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index fell to 44.8 in May 2026, its weakest reading in the past year and a level historically associated with recessionary periods. Real GDP growth slowed to 0.5% annualized in Q4 2025 before rebounding to 2.1% in Q1 2026, while real personal consumption growth remained subdued at 0.5%. Core PCE inflation, the Federal Reserve’s preferred gauge, has remained elevated, sitting near the upper end of its trailing 12-month range based on BEA data compiled through FRED.
Two indicators push back against a recession call. The 10-year/2-year Treasury spread has returned to positive territory at roughly 42 basis points, while the Sahm Rule recession indicator stands at 0.07, well below its 0.50 recession threshold. Labor markets are not signaling an imminent downturn, but the divergence between weak sentiment and elevated asset valuations creates an unusual macro backdrop.
Why A Lost Decade Rarely Feels Like One
Llodra also warned that bear markets seldom fall in a straight line. “They oftentimes are huge declines followed by blistering rallies followed by another decline,” he said, describing the whipsaw pattern that trains passive investors to buy every dip until the final leg down. The March 2026 VIX spike to 35.3, followed by the current retreat to 15.70, is a small-scale example of that volatility clustering.
Host Adam Taggart framed the human stakes bluntly, noting that most of his audience is 45 or older. A lost decade absorbed unprepared, he said, could push retirement “out for you by a long shot, maybe indefinitely,” or force some viewers to “unretire.” His prescription echoed Loder’s: “The time to prepare for this stuff is now while the sun is still shining and you haven’t taken the losses that this type of lost decade could bring to you.”
What To Watch Next
Llodra’s case rests on valuation math rather than crash timing. He argues that the price paid at today’s index levels, combined with mediocre bond math and softening consumer data, sets a low bar for real returns over the next ten years. For investors within a decade of retirement, that argues for stress-testing sequence-of-returns risk today, while the VIX remains under 20 and drawdowns are theoretical rather than realized.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks