Meta vs. Microsoft: Two AI Spenders, Two Very Different Verdicts From Wall Street

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
By Vandita Jadeja Published

Quick Read

  • Meta (META) missed EPS estimates despite 27% ad revenue growth; Microsoft (MSFT) beat by 12% as Azure crossed $100 billion in annual revenue.

  • Microsoft's $678 billion commercial backlog, up 84% year over year, signals contracted AI demand that Meta cannot match, as it remains in build mode.

  • It sounds nuts, but SoFi1 is giving new Active Invest users up to $3,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started.2 See for yourself (Sponsor)

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Meta vs. Microsoft: Two AI Spenders, Two Very Different Verdicts From Wall Street

© 24/7 Wall St.

Meta (NASDAQ: META | META Price Prediction) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) both reported on July 29, 2026, and the results split Wall Street into two camps.

Meta beat on revenue but missed badly on earnings as AI infrastructure costs swallowed the quarter. Microsoft delivered a clean beat, an Azure milestone, and a backlog number so large it reframed the entire AI capex debate. Same theme, opposite verdict.

Ads Still Print Cash for Meta. Azure Is Doing the Heavy Lifting for Microsoft.

Meta’s Family of Apps produced $60.37 billion in revenue, with advertising up 27% year over year on a 14% lift in impressions and a 12% gain in average price per ad. The engine works.

The problem sat below the top line: operating margin compressed to 31% from 43%, weighed down by a $2.4 billion legal charge and $1.18 billion in severance tied to an 8,000-person cut. EPS of $6.18 missed the $7.2173 consensus, snapping a six-quarter beat streak.

META earnings explorer

Microsoft’s Intelligent Cloud segment delivered $39.31 billion, growing 32%. Azure alone grew 43% and crossed $100 billion in annual revenue for the first time. Microsoft 365 Copilot passed 30 million paid seats. EPS came in at $4.74 versus a $4.2397 estimate, an 11.81% beat aided by a $3.2 billion Anthropic-related gain.

MSFT earnings quotes
An infographic titled 'META vs. MICROSOFT: AI SPEND & WALL ST. VERDICTS (Q2 2026)' compares the financial performance of the two companies. The left, red-themed section for Meta, labeled 'MISSED & PRESSURED', shows an EPS miss, $60.37 Billion in Ads Print Cash, $30.12 Billion Q2 2026 Capex, $130B - $145B 2026 Capex Guidance, a drop in Operating Margin to 31%, $784 Million Q2 2026 Free Cash Flow, and a -6.63% 1-week stock reaction. A photo of Mark Zuckerberg is included. The right, blue-themed section for Microsoft, labeled 'BEAT & REWARDED', shows a clean beat, $39.31 Billion Intelligent Cloud Revenue, $35.80 Billion Q4 FY2026 Capex, $115.95 Billion FY2026 Capex, $678 Billion Commercial RPO, and a +0.05% 1-week stock reaction. A photo of Satya Nadella is included. A central table compares both companies on Core Engine focus, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow Growth, RPO Backlog (with Meta having no equivalent metric), and P/E Ratio (22 for Meta, 23 for Microsoft).
24/7 Wall St.

One Company Is Selling the Vision. The Other Is Selling the Receipts.

Both CEOs sound optimistic, but the proof looks very different. Mark Zuckerberg framed the quarter as an investment year, saying “AI is accelerating our core business today, powering our next generation of products, and opening the door to entirely new enterprise opportunities.”

The enterprise opportunity is still theoretical. Meta’s 2026 capex guide moved to $130 billion to $145 billion, and free cash flow collapsed 91.31% to $784 million.

Satya Nadella pointed to specific numbers: “We are advancing the frontier on the cost-to-outcome curve, ensuring every customer can turn tokens into business results.” Behind that quote sits a $678 billion commercial RPO backlog, up 84% year over year. Meta has no equivalent contracted-revenue metric.

Lens Meta Microsoft
Core Engine Advertising (~97% of revenue) Enterprise cloud and productivity
2026 CapEx $130B to $145B $115.95B (FY26)
AI Monetization Proof Ad targeting lift 30M+ Copilot seats
Post-Report Reaction -6.63% (1-week) +0.05% (1-week)

The Next Test Is Whether Meta’s AI Spend Turns Into Ad Yield

For Meta, Q3 guidance of $61 billion to $64 billion keeps the topline healthy, but full-year expenses of $165 billion to $169 billion mean margins stay pressured. Watch whether AI-driven ad pricing keeps climbing without another legal or severance jolt.

META analyst ratings

For Microsoft, the question is whether Azure can sustain a 40%+ growth cadence while capex runs at $35.80 billion a quarter. That RPO backlog says demand is there.

How the Setup Compares Heading Into Next Quarter

On the data, Microsoft heads into next quarter with a $678 billion backlog and 30 million Copilot seats — concrete, contracted demand signals.

Meta trades cheaper at a 22 P/E versus Microsoft near 23, and the ad engine is still growing 27%, which gives a value-oriented framing room to breathe. The Meta setup would look meaningfully different if the next quarter shows free cash flow stabilizing and legal charges fading. For now, Microsoft is monetizing AI outcomes today, while Meta is still in build mode.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
About the Author Vandita Jadeja →

Vandita Jadeja is a financial copywriter who loves to read and write about stocks. She believes in buying and holding for long term gains. Her knowledge of words and numbers helps her write clear stock analysis. She has contributed to several publications, including the Joy Wallet, Benzinga, The Motley Fool and InvestorPlace.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WDAY Vol: 16,323,850
GDDY Vol: 3,030,517
CSGP Vol: 7,967,696
TTD Vol: 34,667,603
WDC Vol: 8,699,102

Top Losing Stocks

TPR Vol: 8,534,041
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
CSCO Vol: 61,560,420
GLW Vol: 8,579,035
MPWR Vol: 506,489