The Grid Fund Was the Right Call. Its Equal-Weight Rival Is Up 30% and Owns What GRID Can’t
GRID holders have done well riding the electrical equipment buildout, but a structural shift in who actually drives power demand is quietly splitting the electrification trade into two very different opportunities.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Holders of the First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (NASDAQ:GRID) made a defensible call on one of the clearest capital-spending stories of the decade: transformers, switchgear, and the power equipment feeding an aging grid. GRID has returned 17.75% year-to-date and 27.17% over the past year, validating the thesis. The question is whether GRID’s specific portfolio still captures the electrification trade as it has evolved, or whether a rival fund now owns the exposure that matters most.
Why GRID Was the Right Call
The NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index is the benchmark GRID tracks, comprising 124 positions across electrical equipment makers, utilities, and smart grid software. The expense ratio is 0.56%, and the portfolio P/E is 27. As of March 31, 2026, AUM stood at $7.65 billion, a scale that really speaks to how popular this trade has become.
The Concentration Problem
A cap-weighted structure defines GRID, and the weights make that clear. Eaton sits at 8.28%, Johnson Controls at 7.90%, National Grid at 7.86%, ABB at 7.58%, and Schneider Electric at 7.26%, with those five names anchoring the book. The top 10 holdings account for 58.84% of total assets. So, for an investor betting on grid buildout, the bulk of the money ends up riding on five mature industrial names that are already trading near-cycle-high multiples.
The gap the portfolio does not cover is the buyer of that equipment. Hyperscale data centers now drive incremental power demand, and GRID’s direct exposure to that end market is thin: NVIDIA at 2.14% and a handful of software names.
The Alternative That Owns What GRID Can’t
The Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (NASDAQ:DTCR) is the closest thing to a pure-play on the load side of the same electrification story. It has returned 30.53% year-to-date and 45.42% over the past year, with net assets of $2.14 billion as of May 31, 2026. The expense ratio is 0.50%.
The DTCR portfolio pairs Equinix at 12.21%, Digital Realty at 10.90%, and American Tower at 9.63% with a semiconductor and hardware layer: SK hynix at 4.72%, Micron at 4.42%, Marvell at 3.84%, AMD at 3.50%, and Super Micro at 2.48%. That gives holders exposure to the entity that actually places the orders that flow back into GRID’s top holdings. Goldman Sachs Asset Management’s 2026 outlook flags the mismatch directly: US power grid assets average 40 years old, while data center demand rises.
The Equal-Weight Rival for Purists
For investors who want to stay inside electrical equipment but drop the top-heavy structure, the ALPS Electrification Infrastructure ETF (NASDAQ:ELFY) is the equal-weight rival. Its top 10 holdings represent only 10.38% of assets, with no single position exceeding 1.19%. ELFY has returned 16.37% year to date, a modest lag to GRID, but the portfolio reaches into utilities such as Constellation Energy and Eversource, as well as service names such as Tetra Tech that GRID underweights. The fund carries a 0.00% expense ratio, though the waiver terms are disclosed in the current prospectus.
The Real Tradeoffs
Different risk characteristics come with DTCR. Beta sits at 1.18, and the REIT concentration means the fund responds to interest rates just as much as it does to AI capex. GRID offers greater geographic diversification, with a heavy European weighting through names such as ABB, Schneider, Prysmian, and National Grid. ELFY, on the other hand, reduces single-name risk but brings in small and mid-cap volatility that a cap-weighted book tends to smooth over.
Reallocation Considerations
In a taxable account, the fund’s five-year return of 96.39% creates embedded gains that complicate a full rotation out of GRID. Directing new contributions to DTCR captures AI-linked power demand, while ELFY offers broader electrification without concentration. Tax-advantaged accounts carry less friction for reallocation.
Where This Leaves the Decision
Grid modernization has been good to GRID holders, given the fund’s ownership of the equipment side of that theme. The argument for pairing it with DTCR hinges on capturing the customer of that equipment rather than replacing the equipment itself. ELFY, by contrast, makes its case on structure more than on sector exposure. Both are options worth evaluating against a specific goal, time horizon, and tax situation.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.
