Why Your Retirement Age Doesn’t Matter (But This Number Does)
Most people plan their retirement around a birthday, but finance experts say that milestone is almost entirely irrelevant. There is one specific number that actually determines whether you can afford to stop working, and your age has nothing to do…
If you have a target retirement age circled on your calendar, you might be planning around the wrong metric. According to finance expert Dave Ramsey, retirement readiness isn’t determined by hitting 60, 65 or any other birthday milestone. What matters is whether you have accumulated enough invested assets to generate the income you need for the rest of your life.
The critical question isn’t “Am I old enough to retire?” but rather “Do I have enough money to retire?” Your investment account balance, not your age, determines when you can afford to stop working. Here’s how to calculate your personal financial number.
3 Methods to Calculate Your Retirement Number
Method 1: The Precise Budget Approach
This method delivers the most accurate result but requires detailed planning. Start by estimating your annual retirement spending. Then subtract guaranteed income sources like Social Security.
For example, if you need $60,000 annually and expect $25,000 from Social Security, your portfolio must generate $35,000 per year. Using the 4% rule (a widely accepted guideline suggesting you can withdraw 4% of your portfolio in year one, then adjust for inflation annually), multiply your income gap by 25. In this case: $35,000 × 25 = $875,000 needed.
The 4% rule exists because historical market data shows this withdrawal rate has historically sustained portfolios through 30-year retirement periods. With the S&P 500 returning 17% over the past year and 75% over five years, equity exposure remains crucial for long-term growth, even as 10-year Treasury yields around 5% provide meaningful income from bonds.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Joel South covers large-cap stocks, dividend investing, and major market trends, with a focus on earnings analysis, valuation, and turning complex data into actionable insights for investors.
He brings more than 15 years of experience as an investor and financial journalist, including 12 years at The Motley Fool, where he served as an investment analyst, Bureau Chief, and later led the Fool.com investing news desk. He has also co-hosted an investing podcast and appeared across TV and radio discussing market trends.
