Wall Street Just Filed to Launch an ETF for All 32 NHL Teams. Here’s What They Would Actually Track.

Volatility Shares Trust, the issuer behind several volatility-linked exchange-traded funds, has filed paperwork with the Securities and Exchange Commission that would create a separate ETF for every one of the 32 teams in the National Hockey League. If cleared, there would be an Anaheim Ducks ETF, a Boston Bruins ETF, a Toronto Maple Leafs ETF, a Vegas Golden Knights ETF, and so on down the roster, each one a standalone fund tied to a single franchise.

This is a filing at the paperwork stage. The prospectus, submitted by Volatility Shares Trust with Volatility Shares LLC as investment adviser, leaves the tickers, the listing exchange, the launch date, and the expense ratio blank. The document also carries the standard notice that neither the SEC nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has approved these securities or passed on the accuracy of the prospectus. No one can buy these funds today, and there is no published timeline for when, or whether, they will list.

What These Funds Would Actually Track

A “Maple Leafs ETF” would confer no ownership of the Toronto Maple Leafs, no equity stake, no share of ticket sales, no cut of media rights, and no claim on franchise value. According to the filing, each fund would seek its objective primarily through cash-settled futures contracts referencing a “CME FSPI NHL [Team] Index,” which the document calls that fund’s Sports Performance Index.

Those indexes are described in the filing as non-investable. Each one measures the cumulative on-ice performance of a single team during regular and post-season games, using a rules-based scoring system where positive actions add points and negative actions subtract them. The methodology, the filing says, is based on fifty-five statistical measures of performance plus results of team games (wins, losses and ties), and the indexes are maintained by an outside provider named FutureSports. Each team’s index starts a season at a base value of 7,500 and moves up or down based on officially reported game statistics, resetting to 7,500 after the postseason.

Because the index itself cannot be bought, each fund would gain exposure through futures on that index, held inside a wholly owned Cayman Islands subsidiary. Each fund would be classified as non-diversified under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The adviser, the filing notes, “does not conduct conventional investment research or analysis or forecast market movement or trends.”

Why It Exists and How It Stacks Up

There is no direct competitor to compare against. U.S. investors can already buy diversified sports and entertainment ETFs holding stocks of leagues, media companies, and gaming operators, but none of those are linked to the play of a single franchise on the ice. Volatility Shares is best known for launching futures-based products in newer markets. Because the tickers, exchange, and fee table are all blank in the filing, there is no expense ratio to translate into dollars yet. That number will only become knowable if and when the funds are cleared to list.

Who It Might Suit and the Risks

These are designed for investors who want a direct, transparent bet on the on-ice fortunes of one specific hockey team, expressed through a regulated fund wrapper rather than a sportsbook. The filing is unusually blunt about the risks of that design.

Because the fund’s performance is driven by the statistical output of one team over the course of a season, it is exposed to player injuries, suspensions, trades, retirements, coaching changes, front-office turnover, league sanctions, labor disputes, lockouts, and other events that affect play. This concentration, the filing warns, “will likely increase volatility in the Fund’s NAV, heighten the likelihood of significant losses over short periods.” And the fund “has no ability to rotate exposure into a different team, sport, or league” if things go badly.

There is also a novel legal question the prospectus flags plainly. In equities, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and decades of case law govern insider trading. In commodity futures tied to sports statistics, the rules are far less settled. Team staff, medical personnel, and league insiders routinely know about injuries, healthy scratches, or lineup changes before the public. As new ETFs, these funds would also start with no track record, likely small assets, and potentially wide bid-ask spreads.

What to watch from here is whether the SEC and CFTC engage with a fund structure that has no clear precedent, and whether the CME index futures the funds need to hold ever begin trading with enough activity to support a listed ETF.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.