ETF

Dividend Aristocrats or Quality Factor: Which ETF Fits Retirement?

Two ETFs built around durable businesses use completely different definitions of what makes a company worth owning, and for investors approaching retirement, that disagreement shapes every dollar they hold.

Published October 19, 2026, 6:33pm ET · 4 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A person's back is visible as they work at a desk, focused on two large computer monitors displaying various financial data. The screens show complex blue and green line graphs, detailed stock tables with tickers and price changes, and numerical values against dark backgrounds. The individual's hands are on a white keyboard and a black mouse, suggesting active interaction with the financial analysis software.
An investor meticulously examines financial metrics on multiple screens, mirroring the rigorous analysis performed by ETFs like NOBL and QUAL to identify top-tier companies. © Rawpixel.com / Shutterstock.com

Ask what makes a company strong, and two popular ETFs built around durable businesses give you opposite answers. The ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (CBOE:NOBL) looks back at decades of dividend increases. The iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (CBOE:QUAL) looks at a company’s finances right now.

Their holdings barely line up. Only 24 companies appear in both funds. That shared group makes up 34.5% of NOBL but just 12.6% of QUAL. For investors near retirement and choosing between them, that gap determines what you actually own.

NOBL Rewards Companies That Never Stopped Raising Payouts

ProShares says NOBL’s index tracks S&P 500 companies that have raised their dividends every year for at least 25 years. ProShares adds that the index picks a minimum of 40 companies, weights them equally, and caps any single sector at 30% of the index.

Equal weighting means each stock gets roughly the same piece of the fund, no matter how big the company is. There’s also a safety valve. ProShares says that if fewer than 40 companies qualify, or a sector limit is broken, the index adds companies with shorter dividend growth histories.

As of its May 31, 2026 SEC filing, ProShares reports NOBL held 69 stocks. Its largest position, Nucor, made up 1.76% of the fund, and its smallest, Pentair, made up 1.15%. That’s how flat equal weighting looks in practice. ProShares notes that as of May 31, 2026, the index had a significant portion of its value in consumer staples and industrials.

A dividend streak long enough to clear ProShares’ 25-year bar shows a business has come through recessions and kept paying, but it says nothing about how that business looks today.

QUAL Grades Today’s Financial Health Instead

According to iShares, QUAL tracks an index of U.S. stocks with high return on equity, stable earnings, and low debt. Its benchmark is the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. Return on equity measures how much profit a company earns on each dollar its shareholders have put in.

As of its July 31, 2026 filing, QUAL held 125 stocks. The largest were Microsoft at 7.16%, Apple at 6.64%, and NVIDIA at 5.85%. As of October 15, 2026, iShares reports information technology at 37.06% of the fund, compared with 4.42% for consumer staples and 8.45% for industrials.

Strong profits, steady earnings, and low debt describe a company’s condition now. A company can score well on all three without paying a significant dividend. As of September 30, 2026, iShares lists QUAL’s 12-month trailing yield at 0.85% and its 30-day SEC yield at 0.78%. The SEC yield is a standardized measure of the income a fund earned over the past month, after fees.

iShares puts QUAL’s price-to-earnings ratio at about 30 as of October 15, 2026. That figure represents what investors pay for each dollar of annual profit, indicating how highly the market values these companies.

Only 24 Stocks Pass Both Tests

Comparing ProShares’ May 31, 2026 NOBL filing with QUAL’s July 31, 2026 filing, 24 companies show up in both. They include Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Procter & Gamble, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, Linde, S&P Global, Automatic Data Processing, Sherwin-Williams, Cintas, and W.W. Grainger. These holdings reflect those dates and shouldn’t be read as current.

Those shared names make up 34.5% of NOBL’s net assets but only 12.6% of QUAL’s. The difference comes from weighting. In an equal-weighted fund the size of NOBL, two dozen steady dividend payers add up fast. In QUAL, the same names sit well below the giant technology positions (Microsoft, Apple, and NVIDIA aren’t in NOBL at all).

The two tests agree on a familiar group of long-established dividend payers. They disagree on almost everything else.

QUAL Costs Less and Leads in Every Period

ProShares lists NOBL’s total annual operating expenses at 0.35%. iShares lists QUAL’s expense ratio at 0.15%. Here are price returns through the October 16, 2026 close.

Metric NOBL QUAL
Share price $57.17 $224.92
Year to date 11.54% 13.93%
One year 15.11% 18.05%
Five years 38.14% 73.96%
Ten years 168.93% 291.44%

QUAL is ahead in every period shown.

The one structural difference this comparison covers is sector mix. QUAL leans heavily on technology, while NOBL tilts toward staples and industrials.

iShares also filed for a forward stock split of QUAL on October 5, 2026, and split-adjusted trading begins November 5, 2026. A split raises your share count and brings down the price per share. The total value of your holding stays the same.

Which Fund Fits Which Investor

NOBL suits an investor who values a long, proven record of rising payouts and wants no single sector to dominate. QUAL suits an investor who wants profitable, low-debt companies today and accepts a heavy tilt toward technology and a smaller yield. QUAL’s share price will look very different after November 5, but the choice between these two definitions of strength stays the same.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →