I wanted to retire at 55 but I kept grinding to get another few million in the bank – why is it so hard to quit?

When you have spent decades working hard and saving diligently for retirement, pulling the plug can feel almost impossible, even when the numbers clearly say you are done. That tension is exactly what one Reddit user posting in r/fatFIRE is wrestling with right now.

The original poster explained that he had planned to retire at 55 since his early 20s, saving and investing specifically to hit that target. When the milestone arrived, he had double the amount he originally said he needed. His spending had grown substantially over the years, and the colleagues who depended on him begged him to stay on.

He agreed to stick it out for one more year in exchange for a promised $6 million payout, then concluded the after-tax amount was not material enough to justify the extension. At his current pace, he will retire at 57 rather than 55, which, as he pointed out, is not really early retirement at all. His core question: why is it so hard to walk away from something he has wanted his entire adult life?

Giving up good earnings can be harder than you think

The OP’s problem is one many people would love to have, but it represents a genuine psychological challenge shared by a surprising number of high earners who have worked toward financial independence and retire early. According to the 2024 MassMutual Retirement Happiness Study, only 10% of retirees retire later than planned. The top reason, cited by 41% of those late retirees, was a desire to keep building wealth. A secondary but meaningful reason, cited by 38%, was simple satisfaction with the job itself. Worth noting: that same study found that Americans overwhelmingly view 63 as the ideal retirement age, making a target of 55 ambitious by any measure.

The pattern has a name: One More Year Syndrome (OMYS). It describes the cycle in which someone who has already reached financial independence keeps postponing retirement by promising themselves just one more year of income. Behavioral research offers a clear explanation for why the cycle is so sticky. Humans feel losses more intensely than equivalent gains, so the prospect of a shrinking portfolio triggers more emotional discomfort than the appeal of reclaimed time and freedom. That asymmetry means an irrational fear of running out can override the mathematical reality of having enough, and left unchecked, one extra year quietly compounds into five or ten as the goalposts keep moving.

Several overlapping forces sustain this behavior beyond loss aversion. Lifestyle creep plays a significant role: as income rises over a career, spending rises alongside it, and the number that once felt like “enough” starts to feel insufficient. That dynamic is compounded by real uncertainty about safe withdrawal rates. Morningstar’s 2025 State of Retirement Income research placed the safe starting withdrawal rate at 3.9% for a balanced 30-year retirement, up from 3.7% the prior year, but still below the traditional 4% rule that many people use as a mental benchmark. The math tightens considerably for early retirees. For someone facing a 40-year retirement horizon, Morningstar’s 2025 base-case safe withdrawal rate drops to just 3.3%, a figure that makes an already large nest egg feel less comfortable. Retirees who want more spending flexibility can push that rate higher: strategies such as delaying Social Security, following a guardrails approach, or incorporating Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) can lift the starting rate as high as 5.7%, though each approach carries its own trade-offs around spending variability and legacy goals.

There is also a powerful identity dimension at play. For someone who has spent 30-plus years defined by a title, a salary, and professional achievement, voluntarily surrendering all of that can feel like a loss of self rather than a reward. Walking away to become a person without a clear professional role can trigger genuine anxiety, even for someone who intellectually knows they no longer need to work.

Running up the score compounds things further. Adding another few million to an already substantial net worth feels like proof of continued success. Stopping feels like an admission that the run is over, and that the quieter rhythms of retirement, however comfortable, simply cannot replicate the momentum of a high-earning career.

What should you do if it is hard to give up work?

The first honest question to ask is whether you actually want to leave. Some people genuinely love their work, the people they do it with, and the sense of purpose it provides. Research published in 2024 in the journal Activities, Adaptation and Aging found that an active, engaged lifestyle is directly linked to higher retirement satisfaction, and for many high earners, demanding professional work serves as that engagement. Plenty of extraordinarily wealthy people choose to keep working well into their 70s and 80s simply because their jobs remain stimulating. There is no obligation to retire early just because a financial target has been reached.

The harder case involves someone who genuinely wants out but cannot bring themselves to go. Research consistently shows that retirees who retire “toward” a concrete new purpose, rather than simply “away from” a job, report significantly better wellbeing outcomes. A 2023 study in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that the retirement transition experience itself, not just finances, is a key predictor of post-retirement life satisfaction. The MassMutual data adds a sobering layer: while 77% of pre-retirees expect to feel happier in retirement, only 67% of current retirees actually do. If you cannot answer the question “what am I retiring to?”, that gap may be doing as much psychological work as the financial uncertainty.

One practical approach is a structured trial run. Taking a three-month sabbatical before making the final decision lets you test whether you genuinely enjoy the absence of structure, rather than just assuming you will. The choice to keep working is also more common than many realize. According to AARP’s July 2026 Employment Data Digest, which draws on Bureau of Labor Statistics figures, 36.9% of Americans aged 55 and older remain in the workforce. Many are not grinding out of financial necessity. They continue working because purposeful activity and social connection genuinely improve wellbeing in later life, and a sabbatical can help you tell the difference between that and mere habit or inertia.

For the OP specifically, the question comes down to which situation he is really in. If he loves his job and finds it genuinely fulfilling, he should keep going without apology. If he is staying only because he does not know how to stop, the extra millions will not fill that gap. He already has far more than he will ever spend. The harder task is figuring out what comes next.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to include the MassMutual finding that 63 is widely viewed as the retirement “sweet spot,” and to add the behavioral economics context of loss aversion as a driver of One More Year Syndrome. The workforce participation figure for Americans 55 and older reflects the most current reading of 36.9% from AARP’s July 2026 Employment Data Digest.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.