Why Suze Orman Is Wrong About Long-Term Care Insurance for Retirees With Over $2 Million

Suze Orman has spent decades urging Americans to buy long-term care insurance. In her AARP column on the subject, she described spending more than $2 million on her own mother’s late-life care and pushed readers not to repeat the gamble. Her recurring line, repeated on her show and across her social channels, is blunt: “Every parent in their 50s and 60s owes it to their kids to consider long-term care insurance as family protection. I know the premiums are steep.”

For a 65-year-old couple sitting on $2.4 million in retirement assets, that advice is wrong. The premium dollars buy a policy whose worst-case payout the portfolio can already cover, and the math leaves heirs measurably poorer if a claim never comes.

Running the actual numbers

Start with what the policy costs. Per current pricing for a couple at 65, hybrid life-LTC coverage runs $5,000 to $8,000 a year combined. Traditional standalone policies come in cheaper, at $3,500 to $5,500 a year. Either way, the cash leaves the household every year until a claim or death.

Stretch that out 20 years, to age 85, when the typical LTC need hits. Cumulative premiums total $70,000 to $160,000. Redirect those same dollars into a portfolio earning 6%, and they grow to $130,000 to $300,000. That 6% assumption is reasonable in context. The 10-year Treasury yields about 4.5% today, so a bond ladder alone closes much of the gap, and a balanced portfolio with equity exposure has historically cleared the rest over 20-year stretches.

Now the liability side. Average lifetime LTC use runs 2 to 3 years at $7,000 to $10,000 per month, putting the total expected lifetime bill at $170,000 to $360,000 in current dollars. Inflation will push that higher: core PCE has risen meaningfully over the past year, and healthcare typically runs hotter than the index.

The self-insurance pot funds the expected liability. If neither spouse ever needs extended care, the money stays in the estate. Premiums paid to a carrier do not.

The variable that flips the answer

Portfolio size, and almost nothing else, determines whether Orman’s advice helps or hurts. A $300,000 care bill on a $2.4M portfolio takes a 13% bite. The same bill on a $700,000 nest egg takes 43% and leaves the surviving spouse exposed for decades.

That is why the breakeven for traditional LTC coverage sits between $500,000 and $1.5 million in liquid retirement assets. In that range, the premium is buying protection against genuine ruin. Above $2M, the carrier is selling protection against a shock the portfolio already absorbs, and charging 20 years of premiums for it.

What this couple should do instead

1. Earmark an LTC sleeve. Set aside $300,000 to $500,000 in a conservative bond ladder dedicated to potential care costs. At today’s Treasury yield near 4.5%, the sleeve generates roughly $13,000 to $22,000 a year in interest while preserving principal.
2. Price a hybrid before dismissing insurance entirely. A hybrid life-LTC policy pays a death benefit if care is never needed, which removes the “use it or lose it” problem of traditional coverage. For families who want a backstop without the premium-burn risk, this is the version worth a quote.
3. Pull the Genworth Cost of Care numbers for your state. Care costs in Connecticut differ sharply from those in Mississippi. Plug your state’s actual monthly figure into the same arithmetic above.
4. Map the Medicaid look-back. Federal rules review 5 years of asset transfers before Medicaid eligibility. Couples planning to protect non-portfolio assets need that clock started well in advance.

Orman’s advice fits the median household. For the couple sitting on $2.4 million, following it costs six figures over the next two decades.