On a recent episode of the Afford Anything Podcast with Paula Pant, author and innovation strategist Lorraine Marchand warned that excessive reliance on technology can weaken the reasoning, memory, and expertise that make a worker valuable. She pointed to a Forbes article and her own research showing IQ scores have “steadily declined since 1970 when the calculator came on the scene.”
Marchand believes workers who repeatedly outsource their thinking to AI may stop developing the judgment and domain expertise required for the jobs that remain five years from now.
Your Brain Cannot Retain Work It Never Truly Performs
Marchand’s claims about “digital dementia” are her own, and aren’t necessarily supported by settled neuroscience. However, the underlying principle is straightforward: if you let technology do all the thinking, you miss the mental practice required to develop and retain expertise. As Marchand put it, “When you don’t have a true understanding of a subject matter, and you’re not truly wrestling with it or thinking about it and putting it into practice, your brain doesn’t retain it.”
What Convenience Actually Costs
Consider Marchand’s example of a Cornell-trained computer engineer at Amazon who was told to stop coding and write prompts instead, and was warned that “within 2 years the AI is going to completely do her job autonomously and she’s not going to have a role at the company anymore.” That is a two-year runway on a skill set that likely took a decade to build.
The financial consequences of that kind of displacement can be enormous. If a senior engineer earning $220,000 in total compensation moves into a $130,000 role, the difference amounts to $90,000 annually, or $450,000 over five years. That excludes the lost growth from smaller retirement contributions, employer matches, and RSU grants. The best protection is to strengthen the judgment, communication, and domain expertise that allow you to direct AI, evaluate its work, and remain accountable for the outcome.
Technical Skills Are Losing Ground to Judgment and Communication
Paula Pant pushed the conversation into workplace terms. She observed that “soft skills,” long dismissed relative to technical skills, are now being prioritized in ways she hasn’t seen in her lifetime. She also flagged the complication: remote work makes it harder to develop human skills because virtual communication is a weaker medium. Marchand agreed, noting that “as a communicator, you have to work harder.”
The paradox is uncomfortable. The skills most likely to survive AI displacement, like judgment, persuasion, negotiation, and cross-functional communication, are the exact skills hardest to build when your workday is a stack of Slack threads and muted Zoom grids. She believes that if you are optimizing for convenience by delegating thinking to AI and delegating presence to a screen, you are compounding two deficits at once.
Key Takeaways
The key lesson is to make sure that even if you’re becoming more efficient with AI, you’re not fully outsourcing your abilities to AI. As technical work becomes easier to automate, judgment, communication, and genuine expertise will increasingly determine who will direct the technology and who gets replaced by it.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks