Tom is 66, lives outside Great Falls, and retired two years ago with roughly $180,000 in an IRA and a paid-off truck. He has not claimed Social Security yet. The math on paper said he could make it work. The math in his kitchen, after a hard winter and a vet bill, said otherwise. Rather than sell stocks into a shaky market or claim Social Security before he wanted to, he started charging for the rides, errands, and light repair work his neighbors already needed.
His clients are almost all older than he is. That is by design. It is the business plan.
Why Montana’s Age Curve Is a Local Service Boom
Montana is aging quickly. In 2024, about 21% of residents were 65 or older, making Montana the eighth-oldest state. By 2030, Montanans 65 and older are projected to make up 23% of the population, up from an earlier 22% projection, while children 17 and under are projected at 20%, down from 21%, per the Montana Free Press.
About 221,000 Montanans were retired in 2025, nearly 24% of residents age 16 and older, and labor-force participation fell from 68.8% in 2000 to 62.4% in 2025, a decline analysts attributed largely to the wave of retirement-age residents. Deaths have exceeded births in Montana every year this decade except 2024.
When the customer base skews older and the working-age labor pool thins, the price of small, personal services rises. Someone still has to shovel the walk, drive a neighbor to a medical appointment, clear out a parent’s estate, or fix a broken storm door.
The Real Financial Tension
Tom’s core problem is one many retirees with thin savings face. Pulling 4% or 5% a year from $180,000 does not close his gap after property taxes, insurance, and groceries. National spending averages help frame the size of that gap. Average annual expenditures reached $78,535 per consumer unit in 2024. Montana may look affordable compared with coastal markets, but housing, fuel, insurance, and healthcare can still make retirement expensive.
Every $500 a month Tom earns is $6,000 he does not have to withdraw. Left invested, that untouched principal can continue compounding. The 2026 Social Security COLA came in at 2.8%, helpful, but not a raise that fills the gap on its own.
The Social Security Wrinkle Most People Miss
Because Tom has not filed yet, the income from his new business does not currently affect his Social Security. But the timing matters if he claims before reaching full retirement age (FRA).
Claiming early permanently shrinks his monthly benefit. If he then earns more than Social Security’s annual limit, the earnings test may temporarily withhold part of his benefit. Those withheld dollars are later reflected in a higher payment after FRA, but the interruption can still complicate cash flow.
Waiting until full retirement age avoids the early-claim reduction. After that threshold, each year of delay through age 70 adds roughly 8% in delayed retirement credits, and the earnings test disappears.
The takeaway is not that everyone with a side business should wait. It is that claiming early while earning meaningful income can shrink the monthly check and disrupt cash flow at the same time.
Two Paths, and the One That Wins for Tom
Path one is the traditional route: claim Social Security, live lean, and draw down the IRA. It is simple, but it can be especially costly for someone with limited savings. It locks in a smaller monthly benefit and begins draining the one asset available to absorb a bad market year or large emergency.
Path two is what Tom chose: delay Social Security if his health and finances allow, cover part of the gap with flexible earned income, and give the portfolio more time. In an aging state, the service menu nearly writes itself.
What to Do This Month
Two strategic moves matter most.
- First, if you are between 62 and FRA and expect to keep earning, run your projected wages or net self-employment income against the Social Security earnings test before filing. Claiming early without accounting for continued work can create a cash-flow surprise.
- Second, price the service, not only the hour. Older clients are paying for reliability, familiarity, and the confidence that someone will actually show up. A retiree who charges only for the minutes spent on the job may be giving away the value of travel time, trust, and availability.
Montana may be near the leading edge, but the demographic wave is national. The same demand exists in every county where the population is graying faster than the workforce. For retirees with useful skills and thin savings, that shift may be less a warning than a customer list.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.