Dave Ramsey Says Claim Social Security at 62. Here’s Where the Math Gets Complicated
Dave Ramsey tells retirees to claim Social Security at 62 and invest the checks, but longevity, taxes, Medicare surcharges, and survivor benefits can quietly unravel that logic before the first dividend arrives.
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Social Security gives retirees a choice that sounds simple until you start doing the math. You can claim as early as 62 and start collecting checks immediately, wait until full retirement age for your full benefit, or hold off until 70 for the largest monthly payment available.
Dave Ramsey has long argued that many retirees should take the first option. His reasoning is straightforward: collect the money while you can, and if you do not need it for living expenses, invest those checks instead of waiting years for a larger monthly benefit.
There is a real case behind that strategy, but there are also several catches. Longevity, market returns, taxes, Medicare premiums, work income, and survivor benefits can all change the calculation. Here is what Ramsey is actually recommending, what the Social Security rules say in 2026, and where the math gets considerably more complicated.
What Dave Ramsey Actually Recommends
Ramsey’s basic argument is that Social Security benefits stop when you die, so collecting sooner gives you more years in which to receive them. His published guidance says that, in most cases, taking retirement benefits sooner makes more sense than waiting.
His second argument is where the strategy becomes more interesting. Ramsey says retirees who already have enough money to cover their expenses can claim Social Security early and invest those checks. He believes long-term investment growth can produce more wealth than simply waiting for Social Security to provide a larger monthly payment.
That distinction matters. Ramsey is not simply saying that everyone should file at 62 and immediately spend the money. His strongest case is aimed at retirees who do not need Social Security to pay their regular bills and can actually leave the early payments invested.
Claiming at 62 Permanently Shrinks Your Monthly Benefit
For anyone born in 1960 or later, Social Security full retirement age is 67. A worker who claims retirement benefits at exactly 62 receives 70% of the benefit available at 67. That reduction reflects the extra five years the worker is expected to collect benefits.
Here is a cleaner way to see the difference. Suppose your full retirement-age benefit is $2,000 a month. Claiming at 62 would provide about $1,400 a month. Waiting until 67 would provide the full $2,000.
The reduction for claiming early generally remains part of your benefit calculation for life, although the rules work differently when benefits are withheld because you continue working. We will get to that wrinkle shortly.
Waiting Until 70 Raises the Benefit to 124%
The other side of the calculation begins once you reach full retirement age. Workers born in 1943 or later earn delayed retirement credits at a rate of 8% per year for delaying retirement benefits beyond full retirement age, up to age 70.
For someone whose full retirement age is 67, waiting until 70 produces a retirement benefit equal to 124% of the full-retirement-age amount. Using our hypothetical $2,000 benefit, that would mean about $2,480 a month at age 70 instead of $1,400 at age 62.
The important distinction is that the 8% delayed-retirement credit applies after full retirement age. The increase between ages 62 and 67 comes from avoiding the early-claiming reduction, not from receiving an 8% annual credit for all eight years.
The Break-Even Age Depends on What You Are Comparing
There is no single Social Security break-even age because the answer changes depending on which claiming ages you compare.
Ignoring taxes, investment returns, and other complications, someone choosing between 62 and 67 reaches a simple cumulative break-even point at roughly age 78 years and 8 months. Before then, the early filer has generally collected more total dollars. After that point, the larger age-67 checks begin producing the higher cumulative total.
Compare 62 with 70 and the crossover happens later, at roughly age 80 years and 4 months. Someone who waits until 70 gives up eight full years of checks, but eventually receives 124% of the full benefit instead of 70%.
These are deliberately simple calculations. Taxes, work history, survivor benefits, investment returns, and the timing of cost-of-living adjustments can change the real-world result.
Longevity Can Completely Change the Answer
Ramsey’s argument is strongest when someone dies relatively early in retirement. A person who claims at 62 and dies before the break-even point may collect more lifetime Social Security than someone who waited for a larger check.
The problem is that nobody knows their expiration date at 62. CDC final mortality data for 2024 show that an American who reaches age 65 can expect to live another 19.7 years on average, which works out to about age 84.7. The average was another 20.8 years for women and 18.4 years for men.
Those are population averages, not predictions for an individual. Health, family history, lifestyle, and plenty of plain old luck matter. But they do explain why delaying benefits can become much more valuable for retirees who live well into their 80s or 90s.
Investing the Early Checks Is Not the Same as Delaying Benefits
Ramsey argues that someone who claims at 62 can invest the checks and potentially build a portfolio large enough to beat the value of waiting. That can happen. It is not guaranteed.
Social Security’s delayed retirement credits provide a known increase in the monthly benefit. Stock and mutual-fund returns depend on what the market does. A retiree who claims at 62 and immediately runs into a long bear market can get a very different result from someone whose first eight years happen to include strong gains.
The comparison also involves different kinds of assets. Investments can potentially grow into money that remains in an estate. A larger Social Security retirement benefit is lifetime income and may also increase a surviving spouse’s benefit, but it is not an investment account with a balance that can simply be passed to heirs.
Taxes Can Complicate the Claim-and-Invest Strategy
Social Security benefits can become taxable once a retiree has enough other income. The federal calculation uses what is commonly called combined income, which generally includes adjusted gross income, tax-exempt interest, and half of Social Security benefits.
For an individual filer, combined income above $25,000 can cause up to 50% of benefits to become taxable. Above $34,000, up to 85% can be taxable. For married couples filing jointly, the corresponding thresholds are $32,000 and $44,000.
This does not mean someone in the upper range pays an 85% tax rate on Social Security. It means as much as 85% of the benefit can be included in taxable income.
If early Social Security checks are invested in a taxable brokerage account, dividends, interest, and realized capital gains can add to taxable income. Depending on the retiree’s other income, that can make the claim-and-invest strategy less clean than simply comparing an expected investment return with Social Security’s benefit increase.
The New Senior Deduction Helps, but It Does Not Make Social Security Tax-Free
A temporary federal tax break now gives many older taxpayers some additional breathing room. For tax years 2025 through 2028, eligible taxpayers age 65 or older may claim an additional $6,000 deduction. Married couples filing jointly can claim $12,000 when both spouses qualify.
The deduction begins to phase out once modified adjusted gross income exceeds $75,000 for an individual or $150,000 for a married couple filing jointly. It is available to eligible taxpayers whether they itemize or take the standard deduction.
The deduction can reduce a senior’s final taxable income and federal tax bill, but it does not replace the existing rules that determine how much Social Security is taxable. The familiar $25,000, $32,000, $34,000, and $44,000 combined-income thresholds still matter.
Investment Income Can Also Raise Medicare Premiums
Taxes are not the only income-related complication. Higher-income Medicare beneficiaries can pay an Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount, better known as IRMAA, on Medicare Part B and Part D.
For 2026, IRMAA begins when modified adjusted gross income exceeds $109,000 for an individual filer or $218,000 for a married couple filing jointly. The standard Medicare Part B premium is $202.90 per month in 2026, with higher-income beneficiaries paying additional amounts.
Medicare generally looks at the tax return from two years earlier. That means 2026 IRMAA is usually based on 2024 income. Taxable dividends and realized gains from an investment portfolio can therefore affect Medicare premiums later, although the result depends on the retiree’s total income and how the investments are held.
Still Working at 62? The Earnings Test Matters
Claiming Social Security at 62 does not require you to stop working, but earning enough money can temporarily reduce the benefits you actually receive.
In 2026, someone who remains below full retirement age for the entire year can earn up to $24,480 before the retirement earnings test applies. SSA withholds $1 in benefits for every $2 earned above that amount.
A different rule applies during the calendar year in which someone reaches full retirement age. In 2026, the higher limit is $65,160, and SSA withholds $1 for every $3 earned above the limit. Only earnings before the month full retirement age is reached count under that rule.
Once full retirement age arrives, the earnings test disappears. A retiree can earn any amount from work without having Social Security retirement checks withheld because of wages.
Benefits Withheld by the Earnings Test Are Not Simply Gone
This is one of the more important details in the entire early-claiming discussion. The earnings test is a withholding rule, not an additional permanent penalty layered on top of the age-62 reduction.
When someone reaches full retirement age, Social Security recalculates the retirement benefit to give credit for months in which benefits were withheld because earnings were too high. If enough entire monthly checks were withheld, the worker’s later monthly benefit can rise accordingly.
That does not make claiming at 62 irrelevant. Benefits actually received before full retirement age still reflect early claiming. But saying a worker permanently loses both the early-filing reduction and every dollar withheld under the earnings test would overstate the cost.
Congress has proposals to eliminate the retirement earnings test altogether. As of September 2026, the Senate’s Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2026 remained referred to the Senate Finance Committee, while the House version remained referred to the House Ways and Means Committee. The existing earnings-test rules therefore remain in effect.
Married Couples Have Another Number to Think About
Ramsey’s observation that an individual’s retirement checks stop at death is true, but married couples have an important additional consideration: survivor benefits.
A spouse’s regular benefit while both partners are alive is generally based on the worker’s full-retirement-age amount and does not include the worker’s delayed retirement credits. Survivor benefits are different. If the higher-earning worker delays retirement and builds a larger benefit, that higher amount can also increase the benefit available to a surviving spouse.
That can make delaying especially valuable when one spouse earned considerably more than the other and the couple wants to protect the surviving spouse’s future income. In that situation, looking only at how many checks the higher earner personally collects misses part of the picture.
Social Security’s Funding Problem Is Real, but the Numbers Need Context
The 2026 Social Security Trustees Report projects that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, which finances retirement and survivor benefits, will exhaust its reserves in the fourth quarter of 2032 if Congress makes no changes.
That does not mean Social Security suddenly goes to zero. Payroll taxes and other continuing income would still arrive. The Trustees estimate that continuing OASI income would be enough to cover about 78% of scheduled benefits at the point reserves are depleted.
The combined Social Security retirement and disability funds are projected to exhaust their reserves in 2034 on a theoretical combined basis, at which point about 83% of scheduled combined benefits would be payable from continuing income.
The long-range outlook also worsened in the 2026 report. The combined OASDI actuarial deficit over 75 years increased to 4.42% of taxable payroll. The Bipartisan Policy Center estimates the 75-year shortfall at roughly $30 trillion, compared with about $26 trillion under the previous year’s projections.
The Trustees specifically identified demographic changes and provisions of the 2025 tax law as contributors to the deterioration. The law’s new senior deduction and other tax provisions reduce projected federal income taxes collected on Social Security benefits, some of which flow back to the program’s trust funds.
There Is No Universal Best Age to Claim
Ramsey’s strategy can make sense under a particular set of assumptions: you can afford to leave the checks invested, markets deliver strong enough returns, taxes and Medicare surcharges do not erase too much of the advantage, and you do not live long enough for the larger delayed benefit to pull ahead by a wide margin.
Waiting can look better under a different set of assumptions. Someone in good health who expects a long retirement may value the largest possible lifetime monthly payment more than eight years of smaller checks. A higher earner in a married couple may also care about maximizing the survivor benefit left for a spouse.
Before filing, it helps to run the decision using your actual Social Security estimate rather than somebody else’s average benefit. Compare ages 62, full retirement age, and 70, then layer in expected work income, taxes, investment income, Medicare premiums, marital status, health, and the amount of retirement savings available outside Social Security.
Social Security gives you several legitimate choices. The difficult part is that the choice that produces the most money for one retiree can be completely wrong for the next one.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
