Walk the sand before the coffee gets cold, no state income tax on your Social Security, a house you can actually afford, and no hurricane insurance meltdown to lie awake about. Florida used to be the default answer to that daydream. Increasingly, readers running the numbers end up looking one state north. Here is what the math looks like if you want to retire at 62 to the South Carolina coast with $850,000 in the account and skip Florida on purpose.
Why the Coast North of Jacksonville Pencils Out
Start with the cost gap. South Carolina’s Regional Price Parity comes in at 93.749 against Florida’s 103.414, roughly ten points of purchasing power you keep by crossing the state line. South Carolina fully exempts Social Security from state income tax and layers a retirement income deduction on top, landing at $6,167 per capita in adjusted state and local burden. Florida is cheaper on paper at $5,110, but that gap gets eaten alive by property insurance, which we will address below.
For a 62-year-old buying into Myrtle Beach, Murrells Inlet, Little River, or Pawleys, a modest single-family or condo in the low to mid $300s is realistic. The Case-Shiller index sits at 335.1 as of May 2026, in the 90th percentile of its 12-month range, so you are buying near the highs. Assume you close with cash from a home sale up north and carry no mortgage.
The Working Budget, in Current Dollars
Priced for a single retiree in a paid-off Grand Strand home:
- Property tax at South Carolina’s 4% primary-residence assessment ratio, HOA, and upkeep: about $6,500.
- Wind, hail, and NFIP flood on a coastal address: $4,500 to $6,000.
- ACA marketplace health coverage from 62 to 65, income managed to hold subsidies: $3,600 to $5,400.
- Groceries and dining: $5,400.
- Utilities, internet, phones: $3,900.
- Vehicle, insurance, fuel, replacement sinking fund: $4,800.
- Miscellaneous, gifts, travel, and reserves: $6,000.
- Federal income tax on withdrawals and dividends: $2,500 to $3,500.
That lands around $42,000 to $46,000 a year. Call it $44,000 as the working number. With 2026’s 2.8% COLA baked in going forward, that budget will float with the CPI, which sat at 332.6 in June 2026.
Turning the Budget Into a Portfolio Target
Claiming Social Security at 62 reduces benefits by up to 30% against your full retirement age check. For a mid-career earner, that lands around $1,650 a month, or roughly $19,800 a year. Subtract that from a $44,000 budget and the portfolio must close a gap of about $24,000 annually.
At a 3.5% withdrawal rate suited to a 30-plus year horizon starting at 62, you need roughly $685,000 doing the work. At a more traditional 4%, about $600,000. The remaining $165,000 to $250,000 of the $850,000 is your bridge and cushion: a treasury ladder or short-duration bond fund funding the first several years, taking advantage of the 10-year at 4.67%, plus a cash bucket that outperforms the 1.68% FDIC average. The equity side stays in broad index funds and dividend ETFs so the 30-year math survives inflation.
Delaying Social Security even two years, funded from that bridge bucket, raises the eventual check by around 16% and materially reduces sequence risk. It is the single highest-return move available inside this scenario.
The Reason Florida Falls Out of the Comparison
Florida’s headline tax advantage is real, but its property insurance market has repriced coastal risk in a way South Carolina’s has not. A comparable coastal Florida home now routinely carries insurance and wind mitigation costs several thousand dollars a year above a similar South Carolina address. Non-homestead property tax caps do not help a retiree buying in. Layer in citizen-insurer surcharges and assessment risk after a bad storm season, and Florida’s $5,110 tax edge disappears inside the insurance line.
South Carolina’s coastal insurance is rising but not yet at Florida’s levels. The state’s 4% primary-residence property tax assessment, the full Social Security exemption, and a retirement income deduction that shelters a meaningful slice of IRA withdrawals for filers 65 and older combine into a structure that treats a retiree’s cash flows gently. That structural treatment is why the coastal SC version of this retirement pencils out on $850,000 while the coastal FL version increasingly does not.
What It Actually Takes
The scenario works with a paid-off house near the water, a $44,000 baseline budget, Social Security claimed at 62 or bridged to 64, and the portfolio split into a five-year treasury and cash ladder alongside a broadly diversified equity core drawn at 3.5%. Miss any of those pieces, carry a mortgage into it, or underprice the coastal insurance line, and $850,000 gets tight fast. Get them right, and the daydream is arithmetic.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.