Let’s Be Real. Only One No Income Tax State Actually Works Once You Add Property and Sales Tax

Most retirees chasing a no-income-tax state forget that the state still has bills to pay, and the math of how it collects from you instead quietly disqualifies almost every popular destination on the list.

Published September 10, 2026, 11:34am ET · 3 min read

Life After Work desk. Editor: David Beren.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

A close-up shot shows the torsos and hands of two people seated at a light wooden table, engaged in financial review. The person on the left wears a dark green t-shirt and has hands resting near paper documents. The person on the right, wearing a light blue long-sleeved shirt and resting against a yellow cushion, holds a black pen in their right hand, pressing a button on a dark grey calculator. Their left hand holds a long white paper receipt over a blue clipboard with more documents.
A couple intently reviews financial documents and uses a calculator, reflecting the critical task of managing household finances and understanding tax burdens in different states. © Chay_Tee / Shutterstock.com

Every retiree eyeing a move has heard the same pitch: do everything you can to find somewhere that will allow you to skip income tax, thereby keeping more money and living better. For the most part, this is true, but what it omits is the mechanism. A state that does not tax income still funds schools, roads, and hospitals, so revenue lands elsewhere on your household. The substitute can easily cost a retiree more than the tax it replaced.

Why the Pitch Targets the Wrong Audience

Income tax falls on income, which drops sharply at retirement. Property tax falls on assessed value, which rises year after year, while sales tax falls on consumption, a large share of a retiree’s fixed budget, especially with healthcare and home upkeep. Trading one for two means giving up a tax that’s about to shrink for two that are indifferent to your income falling.

The no-income-tax pitch benefits high earners still working most and modest-income retirees least. That is the reverse of who the marketing targets.

Eliminating the Field

Washington’s cost of living runs well above the national average at 107.013, and its sales tax structure ranks dead last in the country at 50. It also taxes capital gains, which is wrong for retirees with portfolios. Out. Alaska is tax-light but distant from hospitals and isolated in winter. Out.

New Hampshire has the best sales tax rank at 1 but a property tax rank of 39 that long-tenured owners should fear. Out. Texas has a property tax rank of 40 paired with punishing insurance costs. Out. Florida has medical infrastructure but a cost of living at 103.414 combined with homeowners insurance that behaves like a quasi-tax on ownership. Out.

Nevada has a strong property tax rank at 7 but a narrow economy and broad sales tax. Tennessee has hospital systems and a low cost of living but a sales tax rank of 47 that reaches groceries, the worst place to tax fixed-income households. Out. Wyoming ranks first overall on the 2025 index but has a property tax rank of 44, and healthcare is distant outside Cheyenne and Casper. Out.

South Dakota Actually Works

South Dakota survives the test. It ranks second overall on the 2025 competitiveness index, and carries the lowest income-adjusted state and local tax burden in the country at $5,041 per capita. Its property tax rank of 10 means the substitute for missing income tax lands lightly on an asset that doesn’t shrink when you stop working. Cost of living is the lowest in the no-income-tax group at 88.586. Sioux Falls has a tertiary hospital system, the line most cheap places cannot cross for this audience.

What South Dakota Fails

Winter. Distance from adult children on either coast. A retiree needing weekly access to grandchildren in Boston or ocean air should ignore this recommendation; tax savings will not survive the flights or the mood.

One Complicating Argument

Several states with broad income tax exemptions for most retirement income, and a modest-income retiree can end up cheaper there than in a no-income-tax state funding itself through heavy property levies or grocery-inclusive sales tax. The headline claim survives inside its category. The category itself may be wrong for a household whose retirement income was already going to be small (we counted nine IRS and state-level rules that quietly drain retirement accounts like this one in a free tax trap map).

If you stay inside the no-income-tax bucket, South Dakota works once you factor in property and sales tax. Before signing anything, pull the real property tax levy and homeowners insurance quote on your specific address, and compare that annual figure against what a normal state income tax would have cost on your actual retirement income. If the substitute is bigger than the thing it replaced, the pitch was not written for you.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

David Beren

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

All articles →