Special Report
States With the Best and Worst Health Insurance Coverage
August 21, 2021 10:00 am
Last Updated: August 22, 2021 10:12 am
Source: f11photo / Getty Images
40. Pennsylvania
> Residents under 65, no health insurance: 7.0%
> Residents under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.3% (17th highest)
> Residents under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 22.0% (19th highest)
> Residents under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.0% (10th lowest)
> Residents under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 65.1% (14th highest)
> Residents under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.2% (24th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.1% (9th lowest)
Source: SeanPavonePhoto / Getty Images
39. Connecticut
> Residents under 65, no health insurance: 7.0%
> Residents under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.5% (13th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 23.2% (12th highest)
> Residents under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 0.8% (6th lowest)
> Residents under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 64.2% (19th highest)
> Residents under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.5% (12th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.0% (7th lowest)
Source: DenisTangneyJr / Getty Images
38. New Hampshire
> Residents under 65, no health insurance: 7.6%
> Residents under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 3.2% (21st highest)
> Residents under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 14.6% (8th lowest)
> Residents under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.2% (17th lowest)
> Residents under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 68.8% (4th highest)
> Residents under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 9.1% (21st lowest)
> Residents under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 1.5% (16th lowest)
Source: Davel5957 / Getty Images
37. Kentucky
> Residents under 65, no health insurance: 7.7%
> Residents under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 5.0% (2nd highest)
> Residents under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 28.3% (5th highest)
> Residents under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.4% (25th lowest)
> Residents under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 57.1% (14th lowest)
> Residents under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 7.3% (4th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 2.2% (23rd lowest)
Source: aiisha5 / iStock via Getty Images
36. Washington
> Residents under 65, no health insurance: 7.7%
> Residents under 65, Medicare coverage (or multiple types): 2.4% (11th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Medicaid coverage (or multiple types): 21.4% (21st highest)
> Residents under 65, VA coverage (or multiple types): 1.5% (23rd highest)
> Residents under 65, employer-based insurance (or multiple types): 63.7% (20th highest)
> Residents under 65, direct-purchase insurance (or multiple types): 8.3% (9th lowest)
> Residents under 65, Tricare/military insurance (or many types): 3.4% (8th highest)
Sponsored: Tips for Investing
A financial advisor can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of investment properties. Finding a qualified financial advisor doesn’t have to be hard. SmartAsset’s free tool matches you with up to three financial advisors who serve your area, and you can interview your advisor matches at no cost to decide which one is right for you. If you’re ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
Investing in real estate can diversify your portfolio. But expanding your horizons may add additional costs. If you’re an investor looking to minimize expenses, consider checking out online brokerages. They often offer low investment fees, helping you maximize your profit.
Editors' Picks
