Runaway Spending Is Binding the Fed’s Hands

Photo of Austin Smith
By Austin Smith Published
Runaway Spending Is Binding the Fed’s Hands

© Andrew Burton / Getty Images News via Getty Images

Several Bloomberg analysts speculated about a potential rate cut in September, a notion dismissed as unlikely given current economic indicators. The inflation drop is minimal, and Fed officials like Neil Kashkari suggest no immediate need for a cut. With rates at historically normal levels, the risk of rekindling inflation outweighs potential benefits. Government spending is seen as a primary driver of inflation, and reducing rates might have limited impact.

Transcript:

Bloomberg, three or four people said today that there was a chance for a rate cut in September.

Which I think is close to insane. I don’t know what they were drinking or smoking when they said that.

I would be surprised, wouldn’t be surprised if there was no rate cut at all.

I wouldn’t be surprised either. And, you know, it’s interesting when the inflation number comes in one basis point below what was expected.

It’s like, oh, my God, this is a different reading. We’ve seen nothing like this. And I think you’re right.

And, you know, Neil Kashkari even said, he’s like, well, maybe we could cut later this year, but the data doesn’t really indicate that we should be able to.

And the main thing is, is that rates at current levels, as you and I know from experience, you know, when you have Fed funds at five and a half, that’s not on a historical basis that high.

That’s right in line with historical numbers. It’s just that it was zero for 15 years.

If I’m a Fed governor and I sit in my secret meeting with all the other Fed governors, one of the first things I say to myself is, we’re not hurting the economy.

For the most part, we’re not hurting anything. We take a risk of rekindling inflation if we drop.

If we hold, who gets hurt?

Yeah, and as we’ve noted ad nauseum, the great bulk of the inflation is the weakening of the dollar driven by ridiculous government spending.

That’s absurd. And they can’t do much about that. I mean, even if they drop rates, 25, 50, 75 basis points, they’re still going to be at four and three quarters and you know, okay, so maybe we’re going to just fall to six and a half and you can buy it down a couple of points to six and a quarter.

They know that. I mean, you and I aren’t economists, but we also know that massive government spending has triggered the great bulk of this.

Photo of Austin Smith, PhD, MD, CFA
About the Author Austin Smith, PhD, MD, CFA →

Austin Smith is a financial publisher with over two decades of experience as an investor, analyst, and advisor. He covers stocks, ETFs, Artificial intelligence and personal finance for 24/7 Wall St. Previously, he spent over a decade at The Motley Fool as a senior editor for Fool.com, portfolio advisor for Millionacres, and launched The Ascent to help reader take control of their personal finances.

His work has been featured on Fool.com, NPR, CNBC, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, AOL, Marketwatch, and many other publications. He is as an advisor to private companies, and co-hosts The AI Investor Podcast with Eric Bleeker. 

When not looking for investment opportunities, he can be found skiing, running, or playing soccer with his children. Learn more about Austin's investment approach here.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MRNA Vol: 14,456,655
FDS Vol: 1,547,130
NOW Vol: 27,314,826
WDAY Vol: 10,383,201
DDOG Vol: 9,628,007

Top Losing Stocks

ON Vol: 44,328,069
WDC Vol: 23,405,382
STX Vol: 9,311,397
KEYS Vol: 5,527,047
MPWR Vol: 3,481,726