Suze Orman Warns Most Americans Are Claiming Social Security at the Wrong Age

Photo of Austin Smith
By Austin Smith Published
Suze Orman Warns Most Americans Are Claiming Social Security at the Wrong Age

© kate_sept2004 / E+ via Getty Images

Suze Orman has long advised Americans to delay claiming Social Security until age 70, arguing that the guaranteed 8% annual benefit increase between full retirement age (67 for most workers) and 70 is one of the safest returns available. Her reasoning centers on longevity risk and the math of break-even analysis: those who live past their early 80s will collect significantly more over their lifetime by waiting.

The advice resonates because it offers clarity in an uncertain retirement landscape. With consumer sentiment at 52.9 in December 2025—deep in pessimistic territory—many Americans feel anxious about financial security. Orman’s recommendation promises a concrete action that maximizes guaranteed income, which appeals to those seeking stability.

Where Waiting Until 70 Makes Sense

The math is compelling for healthy individuals with longevity in their family history. Delaying from 67 to 70 increases monthly benefits by 24%, and the break-even point typically arrives around age 82. For someone entitled to $2,000 monthly at 67, waiting until 70 means collecting $2,480 instead—an extra $5,760 annually for life.

This strategy works best for higher earners who can afford to delay, those with other income sources to bridge the gap, and individuals concerned about outliving their savings. With inflation running at 2.2% year-over-year as of January 2026, the larger benefit provides better protection against rising costs through annual COLA adjustments.

Where the Advice Breaks Down

The recommendation assumes financial flexibility that many Americans lack. Personal savings rates dropped from 6.2% in Q1 2024 to 4.2% by Q3 2025, indicating households have thin cushions. For workers facing job insecurity, claiming early may be necessary rather than optional.

Health status matters enormously. Those with chronic conditions or family histories of shorter lifespans may never reach the break-even point. Married couples face additional complexity: the lower earner might benefit from claiming early while the higher earner delays to maximize survivor benefits.

How to Think About This Decision

Rather than treating 70 as a universal target, evaluate your specific situation. Can you comfortably cover expenses until 70 without depleting retirement accounts? Does your health suggest above-average longevity? Do you have a spouse whose survivor benefit depends on your claiming age?

Orman’s advice captures an important truth: delaying increases lifetime income for those who can afford to wait. But financial advice framed for everyone fits no one perfectly. The optimal claiming age depends on savings, health, and household circumstances that vary widely across retirees.

Photo of Austin Smith
About the Author Austin Smith →

Austin Smith is a financial publisher with over two decades of experience in the markets. He spent over a decade at The Motley Fool as a senior editor for Fool.com, portfolio advisor for Millionacres, and launched new brands in the personal finance and real estate investing space.

His work has been featured on Fool.com, NPR, CNBC, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, AOL, Marketwatch, and many other publications. Today he writes for 24/7 Wall St and covers equities, REITs, and ETFs for readers. He is as an advisor to private companies, and co-hosts The AI Investor Podcast.

When not looking for investment opportunities, he can be found skiing, running, or playing soccer with his children. Learn more about me here.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

HPE Vol: 153,197,465
ENPH Vol: 8,360,053
GLW Vol: 18,152,646
APTV Vol: 6,761,325

Top Losing Stocks

TTD Vol: 21,905,513
INTU Vol: 7,383,018
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
CBOE Vol: 5,000,011
HP
HPQ Vol: 29,259,826