Energy and International ETFs Offer the Diversification Your $1,000 Deserves in 2026

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) holds $720.5 billion in assets with a 3 basis point expense ratio and is down less than 1% year-to-date despite 31% returns over the past year, heavily concentrated in mega-cap tech at 33% of the portfolio. Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) is up 3% year-to-date and 25% over the past year by rebalancing away from mega-cap tech concentration, while Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) surged 28% year-to-date as WTI crude oil hit $114 per barrel, and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund (VXUS) gained nearly 8% year-to-date outpacing U.S. equities with a softer dollar and lower valuations.

  • International stocks and energy sectors have significantly outperformed large-cap U.S. technology stocks in early 2026 as oil prices reached a 99.6th percentile level due to Middle East tensions and as the weaker dollar boosted foreign valuations.

  • The analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just named his top 10 AI stocks. Get them here FREE.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Energy and International ETFs Offer the Diversification Your $1,000 Deserves in 2026

© Joyseulay / Shutterstock.com

With the VIX sitting near 19 after a sharp pullback from a March spike above 31, and the Fed holding rates steady at 3.75% after cutting 75 basis points over the prior year, the equity market backdrop in April 2026 sits in ambiguous territory. That makes the question of where to put $1,000 more interesting than usual. Four ETFs cover meaningfully different ground right now: a bedrock S&P 500 tracker, an equal-weight alternative that has quietly outperformed it year-to-date, an energy fund riding an oil surge, and a broad international fund that has left U.S. stocks behind so far this year.

The S&P 500 Anchor: iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA:IVV) is the clearest expression of owning the U.S. large-cap market at essentially no cost. Its 3 basis point expense ratio and 3% annual portfolio turnover mean almost nothing leaks out in fees or trading friction. The fund has $720.5 billion in assets and has been running since May 2000, giving it one of the longest live track records of any ETF.

The portfolio is heavily tilted toward technology. Technology represents 33% of the fund, with NVIDIA alone at nearly 7% and Apple at about6%. That concentration has driven strong long-term returns: 31% over the past year and 290% over the past decade. Year-to-date, however, IVV is essentially flat, down less than 1%.

The trade-off is the same as it has always been with a cap-weighted index: the fund’s fate is closely tied to a handful of mega-cap technology names. If those names underperform, the whole fund underperforms. For an investor seeking the simplest, lowest-cost U.S. equity exposure, IVV is the standard-setter. For an investor who wants to reduce that tech concentration, the next fund on this list is the more direct answer.

Equal Weight as a Quiet Outperformer: Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NYSEARCA:RSP) holds the same 500 companies as IVV but assigns each one roughly the same portfolio weight. The result is a fund in which Industrials and Financials each account for around 14% of the portfolio, while Information Technology accounts for 16%. NVIDIA is no longer a 7%-plus position; instead, the fund’s largest individual holdings are mid-tier names like Ciena and Seagate, each at fractions of a percent.

That rebalancing away from mega-cap tech has worked in RSP’s favor so far in 2026. While IVV is essentially flat year-to-date, RSP is up 3%. Over the past year, RSP returned 25%, and it carries a 1.57% dividend yield compared to IVV’s 1.17%. The fund has $83.2 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.2%, higher than IVV but still modest in absolute terms.

The structural caveat: equal weighting requires regular rebalancing to maintain parity across 500 positions, resulting in more turnover than a passive cap-weighted fund. Over longer periods, when large-cap tech is in a sustained bull run, RSP has historically trailed IVV. The choice between the two depends largely on whether an investor believes the current broadening of market leadership will continue or reverse.

Oil Above $114 and What It Means for Energy: Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

The Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSEARCA:XLE) is the most timely pick on this list. WTI crude oil has surged to $114 per barrel, driven by geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz and fears of supply disruptions. That price represents the 99.6th percentile over the past 12 months and reflects a roughly 26% gain in a single month. Energy companies translate that directly into wider margins, stronger free cash flow, and larger dividends.

XLE captures that dynamic through a concentrated portfolio of U.S. energy majors. Exxon Mobil and Chevron together account for more than 40% of the fund, with ConocoPhillips at about 7% and Williams Companies, Valero, and SLB filling out the next tier. The fund spans integrated oil, exploration and production, midstream pipelines, refining, and oilfield services, giving it exposure to different parts of the energy value chain within a single ticker.

Performance reflects the oil surge: XLE is up 28% year-to-date and 53% over the past year. The fund carries a 2.63% dividend yield and an expense ratio of 0.08%. The concentration risk is real: if oil prices retreat sharply, XLE will fall hard and fast. The fund’s entire thesis is commodity-price dependent, and at the 99.6th percentile of recent prices, mean reversion is a genuine possibility. The fund has outpaced the broader market by a wide margin this year.

International Markets Are Leading in 2026: Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund

Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund ETF Shares (NASDAQ:VXUS) tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index, covering developed and emerging markets outside the United States across more than 8,500 holdings. With $582.3 billion in assets and a 5-basis-point expense ratio, it is one of the broadest and cheapest ways to own non-U.S. equities.

The performance case for VXUS in 2026 is straightforward: international stocks have outrun U.S. equities by a wide margin. VXUS is up nearly 8% year-to-date and 44% over the past year, compared to IVV’s essentially flat year-to-date return. The drivers include a softer U.S. dollar, relatively lower valuations in European and Asian markets, and reduced exposure to volatility in the U.S. technology sector, all of which have weighed on domestic indices. The fund’s 2.79% dividend yield also provides a more meaningful income stream than most U.S. equity funds at current prices.

The geographic mix leans toward Canadian financials and energy names at the top of the holdings list, with broader European and Asian exposure filling out the rest of the 8,500-stock portfolio. The caveat is currency risk: returns in U.S. dollar terms depend partly on the dollar’s direction, and a strengthening dollar can erode international gains even when local market returns are strong. VXUS is most useful as a complement to a U.S.-focused core position rather than a replacement for one.

How the Four ETFs Differ in Practice

IVV offers the lowest cost and broadest U.S. large-cap exposure, with returns tied closely to a handful of mega-cap technology names. RSP covers the same 500 companies with less concentration at the top and a higher dividend yield, at a modestly higher expense ratio. XLE is the most directly tied to a single commodity: oil prices at historically elevated levels drive its returns, and a reversal would weigh heavily on the fund. VXUS provides exposure to non-U.S. markets across more than 8,500 holdings, with currency fluctuations adding a layer of return variability not present in domestic funds.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MU Vol: 52,583,926
DAL Vol: 16,226,768
AXON Vol: 1,533,746
COIN Vol: 10,896,694
TDG Vol: 471,299

Top Losing Stocks

KMX Vol: 13,496,323
AKAM Vol: 8,717,745
APA
APA Vol: 7,792,743
WFC Vol: 32,845,843
CHTR Vol: 2,429,117