Will SpaceX’s $1.75 Trillion IPO Valuation Survive Friday’s Market Rout?

Photo of Rich Duprey
By Rich Duprey Published

Quick Read

  • Friday's market rout erased $1.4 trillion in S&P 500 value, tightening the pricing window for SpaceX's $1.75 trillion IPO on June 12.

  • Morningstar prices SpaceX 55% above intrinsic value, while a $4.3 billion Q1 loss makes the IPO a bet on flawless future execution.

  • With 78% of proceeds already committed and expected index inclusion forcing passive inflows, supply scarcity could override valuation concerns at launch.

  • Don't wait: the analyst who called NVIDIA in 2010 just revealed his top 10 AI stocks. See the full list FREE now.

Will SpaceX’s $1.75 Trillion IPO Valuation Survive Friday’s Market Rout?

© 24/7 Wall St.

SpaceX’s long-awaited IPO is coming on June 12, but is sitting at the center of one of the most aggressive valuation debates in recent market history. At a projected $1.75 trillion valuation, the offering is being priced not just as a capital markets debut, but as a forward claim on decades of satellite broadband revenue, reusable rocket economics, and near-monopoly positioning in commercial space infrastructure. 

That backdrop would already be challenging in a calm market. It became more complicated after Friday’s market rout, when the stock market tumbled as investors reacted to a red-hot jobs report that increased the likelihood interest rates will begin rising sooner than expected. The S&P 500 erased an estimated $1.4 trillion in market value as high-multiple technology and AI-linked stocks led the decline, with traders quickly reassessing how much future growth is worth when discount rates are no longer expected to fall.

That backdrop matters more than usual because it sets the tone for SpaceX’s looming IPO, one of the most closely watched listings in years.

Tech Rout Pressure Is Rewriting Risk in Real Time

Friday’s selloff was not about collapsing earnings — it was about overextended valuations after a remarkable bull market rally and the sustainability of AI’s demand curve. As interest rates may soon begin shifting upward, a market that rallied 20% in two months suddenly appears risky. Because semiconductor and AI infrastructure stocks were at the forefront of that rapid melt up,  they were among the stocks hit hardest by the decline.

In short, investors didn’t abandon tech — they just demanded a higher margin of safety. That shift directly feeds into how they will approach a $1.75 trillion IPO priced for perfection.

A Valuation Built on Execution Without Error

According to Morningstar, SpaceX is being valued at roughly 55% above its estimated intrinsic value range. That gap is manageable in a bull market, but becomes dangerous when liquidity tightens.

SpaceX is still not profitable, but the IPO narrative assumes flawless execution across two massive programs:

  • Starlink scaling into a global broadband cash machine
  • Starship achieving reliable, low-cost orbital economics

The issue is timing. Investors are being asked to price a company on the assumption that both programs hit commercial maturity with minimal delays or cost overruns.

History is not entirely supportive. Research published by the University of Florida shows that roughly 60% of IPOs are flat or negative three years after listing, even in strong market cycles. That suggests enthusiasm at launch often outruns long-term fundamentals.

A green-themed financial infographic outlining the $1.75 trillion valuation debate for SpaceX's IPO, featuring market charts and risk/reward analysis.
A $1.75 trillion moonshot meets a brutal market reality. SpaceX is about to face the ultimate test of investor conviction. © 24/7 Wall St.

Why It Could Flop — and Why It Still Might Work

There are clear risks pointing toward underperformance:

  • Valuation strain: $1.75 trillion implies near-perfect execution for a company not yet profitable, meaning the stock could drop significantly after the initial hype
  • Tech sector contagion: Friday’s selloff shows investors are already reducing exposure to extended valuation assets and could become more cautious about overhyped, non-profitable, or high-valuation companies
  • Lack of immediate profits: Despite dominating the launch market, SpaceX reportedly lost $4.3 billion in the first quarter, which may cause investors to hesitate once the initial excitement settles
  • IPO history: 60% of new listings underperform over three years, making SpaceX’s debut a potential “trap” for long-term investors

Yet that’s not a guaranteed outcome and there are plenty of reasons why the SpaceX could still be a mega-hit:

  • “Must-own” status: SpaceX is widely viewed as foundational infrastructure for space and communications and the fear of missing out — FOMO — may override the fears of a failed IPO
  • Institutional backstop: Expected inclusion in major benchmarks like Nasdaq-100 and FTSE Russell indices could force passive index inflows, and retail investors aren’t the only ones gripped by FOMO — many institutional investors feel they cannot miss out on what could be the biggest IPO in history
  • Supply scarcity: About 78% of IPO proceeds are already committed by investors, limiting free float and tightening supply-demand dynamics

Key Takeaway

In the end, SpaceX’s IPO is not just a company listing — it’s a referendum on whether the market is still willing to pay peak multiples for an innovative company with a multi-year growth timeline.

The Friday tech rout didn’t break the bull case, but it did tighten the pricing window. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, SpaceX doesn’t need enthusiasm — it needs conviction that earnings will eventually catch up to the narrative.

That’s a higher bar than the market was paying for a week ago. And investors will find out quickly whether it’s too high to clear — or just high enough to redefine what “growth” pricing really means.

Photo of Rich Duprey
About the Author Rich Duprey →

After two decades of patrolling the dark corners of suburbia as a police officer, Rich Duprey hung up his badge and gun to begin writing full time about stocks and investing. For the past 20 years he’s been cruising the markets looking for companies to lock up as long-term holdings in a portfolio while writing extensively on the broad sectors of consumer goods, technology, and industrials. Because his experience isn’t from the typical financial analyst track, Rich is able to break down complex topics into understandable and useful action points for the average investor. His writings have appeared on The Motley Fool, InvestorPlace, Yahoo! Finance, and Money Morning. He has been featured in both U.S. and international publications, including MarketWatch, Financial Times, Forbes, Fast Company, and USA Today.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

COO Vol: 9,090,870
CLX Vol: 3,290,263
KVUE Vol: 24,618,710
KMB Vol: 6,361,016
ALL Vol: 1,638,476

Top Losing Stocks

ENPH Vol: 10,448,766
MU Vol: 77,252,156
TER Vol: 5,480,426
FSLR Vol: 3,903,927
INTC Vol: 145,138,050