Forget QQQI’s 14%. NEOS Just Launched a ‘Boosted’ Version Paying 20%

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • XQQI uses 150% notional option exposure on the same Nasdaq-100 index as QQQI to deliver a ~20% distribution rate, roughly 6 percentage points above QQQI's payout.

  • XSPI brings the same boosted option structure to S&P 500 investors, launching with $680M in assets and a 0.98% expense ratio.

  • XQQI's amplified exposure cuts both ways, dropping 7% in one month versus QQQI's 4.5%, with under six months of trading history to judge it by.

  • The most widely read finance newsletter on Substack isn't published by a bank, it's Doomberg, where 383,000+ readers get the energy and macro analysis the mainstream press misses. 24/7 Wall St. readers save 17% on their first year here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Forget QQQI’s 14%. NEOS Just Launched a ‘Boosted’ Version Paying 20%

© FAMILY STOCK / Shutterstock.com

The NEOS Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF (NASDAQ:QQQI) has become one of the more crowded trades in monthly income, drawing capital with a distribution rate near 14.60% and a Section 1256 tax angle that appeals to taxable accounts. QQQI pairs Nasdaq-100 stock exposure with a call-option overlay to convert index volatility into cash, paying monthly since its January 30, 2024, launch. NEOS quietly rolled out a sibling on the same chassis targeting roughly a 20% payout, and QQQI holders now have a same-issuer swap worth examining.

Why QQQI Attracts Income Investors

Investors will find that this fund does exactly what it promises. Over the trailing 12 months, total distributions have reached $7.624985 per share based on the July 31 price of $53.04, and the July payment of $0.6346 shows that the monthly distribution schedule remains steady. The net expense ratio is a low 0.68%, while assets under management total roughly $813.31M, with a notable tilt toward mega-cap tech holdings like NVIDIA at 8.34%, Apple at 7.73%, and Microsoft at 6.81%. Over the past year, the total return came in at 16.01%, which reflects both the income stream and a share of the broader upside seen across the Nasdaq-100.

Where the Ceiling Sits

A standard covered-call overlay caps the fund’s premium income at whatever the option market will pay for near-the-money calls on the underlying basket. When realized volatility drifts lower, so does premium, and the distribution rate follows. QQQI’s payouts have wobbled inside a narrow band, ranging from $0.5309 in April 2025 to $0.6589 in May 2026. For an income-first holder, the strategy works, but the ceiling is structural rather than tactical.

The Boosted Version and How It Gets to 20%

The NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100® High Income ETF (NASDAQ:XQQI) launched on February 3, 2026, and uses up to 150% notional option exposure on the same Nasdaq-100 underlying. The added notional gives the fund more premium to distribute without adding a corresponding amount of directional equity risk, and the option leg still qualifies for Section 1256 60/40 treatment plus return-of-capital classification on part of the payout. Distributions land in the first week of each month, staggering XQQI against QQQI’s later-month schedule for holders who want to layer payment dates.

The early numbers back the pitch. XQQI’s July distribution was $0.6772 on a July 31 close of $47.43, and prior monthly amounts were $0.6216 in June, $0.6586 in May, and $0.7672 in April. Annualized against a lower share price, those payments map to a distribution rate roughly 500 to 600 basis points above QQQI’s. The cost of that lift is a 0.98% net expense ratio, 30 basis points above QQQI.

An S&P 500 Version for Broader Index Holders

Investors anchored to the S&P 500 rather than the Nasdaq-100 have a matching product in the NEOS Boosted S&P 500® High Income ETF (NASDAQ:XSPI), which launched on January 29, 2026, with $679.60M in assets. XSPI’s annualized forward distribution estimate is $8.4048, with the July payment of $0.7004 extending the monthly cadence that began in February. The expense ratio matches XQQI at 0.98%.

Tradeoffs Worth Naming

That boost works in both directions, and over the past month, XQQI has dropped 7.21% while QQQI fell 4.5%, which aligns with the higher notional exposure driving steeper drawdowns and larger premium swings. One thing to keep in mind with the distribution is that a return of capital lowers the cost basis rather than being treated as ordinary income, so taxes are deferred rather than wiped out entirely. Trading history is another factor worth noting, since XQQI has less than six months on the books, meaning there is no full-cycle track record through a sustained volatility spike. By contrast, QQQI can point to 30 months of consistent monthly payouts.

Working the Swap

For accounts holding QQQI at a gain in taxable form, a full swap triggers realized capital gains that can offset multiple years of the yield differential. A partial rotation, sending new contributions to XQQI while leaving the QQQI lot untouched, sidesteps that problem. IRA and 401(k) accounts avoid the tax friction entirely, which changes the calculus for a full swap when the higher payout is the priority. Staggering exposure across QQQI and XQQI also spreads distribution dates across the month.

Weighing the Decision

Among covered-call income funds, QQQI holds its own with a longer track record and a leaner expense ratio. Its counterpart XQQI uses the same underlying index and layers on additional option notional, resulting in a heftier monthly payout, though at a higher expense ratio and greater NAV sensitivity. If monthly cash flow is the main objective, XQQI is the fund that quantifiably puts more in your pocket. Yet for those who place greater weight on the tighter drawdown profile and the established 30-month payment history of QQQI, those strengths may very well outweigh the appeal of a larger distribution.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

EXPE Vol: 1,562,644
DLTR Vol: 2,413,224
CHD Vol: 1,849,525
MO Vol: 10,120,914
GDDY Vol: 1,318,223

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
STX Vol: 3,201,093
MU Vol: 29,802,462
JBHT Vol: 1,266,622
SMCI Vol: 39,820,444