Dividend growth investing offers retirees more than one path to reliable income, and the choice between paths matters more once the paychecks stop.
The Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (NYSE:SCHD) and the iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (NYSE:DGRO) both screen for dividend quality, but they define it differently, and those differences translate into meaningfully different outcomes depending on where an investor stands at 60 versus 65.
Choosing between them is less about which fund is objectively better and more about which one matches the income timeline in front of you.
What Each Fund Is Built to Do
The Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF screens for high-dividend-yielding US stocks using criteria that include dividend consistency, cash flow strength, and financial health relative to peers. The result is a concentrated portfolio of 103 holdings tilted heavily toward sectors with established cash flow histories.
Healthcare leads at 20.80% of the portfolio, Consumer Staples follows at 20.06%, Energy at 15.18%, and Technology at 12.80%, which is notably lower than the broader market. Top holdings as of late July 2026 include Abbott Laboratories, UnitedHealth Group, Merck, Amgen, and Procter & Gamble. The fund carries a 0.06% expense ratio, a beta of 0.70, and $100.89 billion in assets, making it one of the largest dividend ETFs available today.
Alternatively, the iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF takes a different entry point. Rather than targeting high current yield, it requires a minimum of five consecutive years of dividend growth from its holdings and screens for payout ratios to filter out companies paying dividends they cannot sustain.
The resulting portfolio is far broader, with 397 holdings, and carries more exposure to sectors with growth characteristics. Financials lead at 20.15%, Technology at 18.45%, and Healthcare at 16.53%, with top holdings including JPMorgan Chase, Johnson and Johnson, Apple, AbbVie, ExxonMobil, and Microsoft. The ETF’s expense ratio is 0.08%, beta is 0.78, and assets stand at $42.24 billion.
The Yield and Growth Trade-off
The most visible difference between the two funds is the yield, as SCHD currently yields 3.15% with a trailing annual dividend of $1.05 per share. DGRO yields 1.90%, with a trailing annual dividend of $1.48 per share, which means that for retirees over 60, SCHD is currently delivering more on every dollar invested.
The payout ratio and dividend growth numbers tell a bit more of a nuanced story. SCHD carries a payout ratio of 54.60% and a dividend growth rate of 2.24%. DGRO’s payout ratio is 41.85% with a dividend growth rate of 4.37%. The lower payout ratio and higher growth rate suggest that for retirees over 60, DGRO’s underlying companies are retaining more earnings and increasing their dividends at a faster pace. Over a long enough horizon, the compounding can close the yield gap in a substantial way.
For a retiree who needs cash flow now, SCHD’s higher current yield is the more practical answer. For an investor in their early 60s drawing from other income sources and wanting to build toward a larger income stream in their late 60s and 70s, DGRO’s growth trajectory is more compelling.
Performance Context
Ultimately, both funds have delivered strong long-term results. SCHD’s one-year total return through July 24, 2026 was 26.05%, with a 10-year annualized return of 12.51% and an average annual return since its October 2011 inception of 13.37%. For its part, DGRO’s one-year total return was 20.83%, with a 10-year annualized return of 13.30% and an average annual return since its June 2014 inception of 12.47%.
Over the full stretch of comparable data, the two funds have performed remarkably close to each other in total return terms. The primary difference has not been in how much they returned but in how that return was distributed between income and appreciation.
Which One Best Fits After 60
For investors over 60 who are fully retired or within two to three years of stopping work, SCHD’s combination of a higher starting yield, lower beta, and a deeply defensive sector mix makes it the more natural fit for the income layer of a portfolio. The fund does what it says, consistently distributing income from companies that have earned the right to pay it.
Investors in their early 60s who still have time on their side will see DGRO earn its place as the dividend growth story works well. Its broader diversification, higher technology exposure, and lower payout ratio make it better positioned to grow into its role as an income source over the next decade. The two funds are not competitors so much as different tools for different moments in the same retirement timeline.
Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks