Two Funds Promise 20% Income From the S&P 500. One Caps Your Upside, One Doesn’t, and It Charges Less

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • SPYT caps S&P 500 upside to generate its 21% yield; XPAY delivers the same income target with no cap and charges 19 basis points less.

  • SPYT wraps IVV in a daily call-spread overlay that cost investors nearly 2 percentage points of last year's S&P 500 return, while XPAY's SPY-call structure matched the index.

  • Both funds warn that payouts may include return of capital, and both have already trimmed their monthly distributions since launch.

  • The most widely read finance newsletter on Substack isn't published by a bank, it's Doomberg, where 383,000+ readers get the energy and macro analysis the mainstream press misses. 24/7 Wall St. readers save 17% on their first year here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Two Funds Promise 20% Income From the S&P 500. One Caps Your Upside, One Doesn’t, and It Charges Less

© mixmotive / iStock Editorial via Getty Images

The Defiance S&P 500 Target 20 Income ETF (NASDAQ:SPYT) is one of the more aggressive income products marketed to S&P 500 holders, promising roughly 20% annualized distributions from a strategy built on top of an S&P 500 core. Owners of SPYT get a monthly paycheck and equity exposure in a single ticker, and the fund has delivered on the income side: a trailing 12-month distribution total of $3.6069, against a current price near $17.54, works out to a yield of around 20.58%. The cost of that payout shows up in participation and fees. A competing fund with the same 20% target now offers a better version of the same trade.

Why Investors Bought SPYT in the First Place

Roughly 100% of net assets in the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF are held in SPYT, with a daily call spread overlay layered on top of that core position. That structure delivers S&P 500 exposure while systematically selling upside to fund the distribution. For a retiree who wants monthly cash flow tied to large-cap U.S. stocks rather than junk bonds or MLPs, the pitch is reasonable. The fund has scaled to $152.3 million in net assets on the strength of that idea.

The Gap Between the Yield and the Total Return

The call-spread overlay generates income and also causes SPYT to lag the index it is built on. The S&P 500 returned 21.46% over the past year on a price basis. SPYT, including all distributions, returned 19.61% over the same window. The prospectus language is explicit that the fund “generally forgoes gains of the Underlying Security above the call option strike price.” In a strong market, that gap widens. In a weak one, the premium income cushions the drawdown, but SPYT still owns the S&P 500 core underneath.

Fees add to the drag. SPYT carries an expense ratio of 0.68%, roughly double what a plain S&P 500 index fund buyer would pay before overlay costs are considered.

The Alternative: XPAY

The Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Income ETF (NYSEARCA:XPAY) targets the same 20% annualized distribution against the same underlying index, but constructs its exposure differently. Rather than holding IVV outright and capping it with a call spread, XPAY uses SPY call options as its core exposure, with top 10 positions accounting for 89.67% of assets. The reported expense ratio is 0.49%, giving XPAY a 19-basis-point cost advantage over SPYT.

The performance record reflects the structural difference. Over the past year, XPAY returned 21.99% on an adjusted basis, effectively matching the S&P 500’s 21.46% while paying out a distribution yield of 20.37%. Year to date, XPAY is up 12.97% against SPYT’s 12.28% and the S&P 500’s 12.71%. In a year where the index moves higher, uncapped exposure has produced a total return closer to the index while still delivering the target payout.

The Tradeoffs Worth Naming

Neither fund is a substitute for owning the index. Both rely heavily on options and are classified as non-diversified; both explicitly warn that a meaningful share of distributions may be classified as a return of capital. ROC can be tax-deferred at the individual level because it reduces the cost basis rather than being treated as ordinary income, but it also means that part of what looks like “income” is the investor’s own capital coming back. XPAY’s monthly distribution has already been trimmed once, from $0.952845 in 2025 to $0.899537 starting with the February 2026 declaration, a reminder that the 20% target is an objective rather than a guarantee.

The distribution on SPYT has drifted lower as well, moving from a February 2025 payment of $0.3272 down to $0.2862 on August 3, 2026. Investors comparing the two would do well to evaluate them on total return plus distribution stability alongside that headline yield.

How a Swap Would Work

Within a tax-advantaged account, rotating from SPYT to XPAY is mechanically simple and incurs no capital gains tax consequences. In a taxable account, any embedded gain in SPYT would be realized on sale, so the decision hinges on whether the lower fee and uncapped structure offset the tax bill. A partial rotation, keeping SPYT positions with the largest unrealized gains and directing new contributions to XPAY, is one way to shift exposure without triggering a full tax event.

What This Means for a SPYT Holder Today

What it advertises is exactly what SPYT delivers. XPAY offers the same income target with a lower expense ratio, an uncapped structure, and a one-year total return that has tracked the S&P 500 more closely. For an investor whose reason for owning SPYT is 20% income from large-cap U.S. equities, XPAY is worth evaluating against that specific goal, particularly for new capital and tax-advantaged balances where the switching cost is zero.

 

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CPRT Vol: 17,352,852
AMD
AMD Vol: 25,459,684
Fox
FOX Vol: 1,068,989
STX Vol: 5,238,912
Fox
FOXA Vol: 7,497,883

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
AVGO Vol: 29,422,333
GDDY Vol: 2,084,902
AMAT Vol: 13,111,509
CRWD Vol: 6,740,355