After Comparing Every Bond ETF Paying Over 6 Percent, These 3 Win as the Fed Cuts Rates

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • USHY delivers a 6.9% yield at just 0.08% in expenses, while CLOZ targets similar income via CLO mezzanine tranches with lower duration sensitivity.

  • TLTW's 11% distribution yield masks principal erosion, as its covered-call overlay on long Treasuries produced only a 3% one-year total return.

  • It sounds nuts, but SoFi1 is giving new Active Invest users up to $3,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started.2 See for yourself (Sponsor)

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
After Comparing Every Bond ETF Paying Over 6 Percent, These 3 Win as the Fed Cuts Rates

© Drozd Irina / Shutterstock.com

The Federal Reserve has taken its target rate from 4.5% to 3.75% over the past year, and reinvestment risk has arrived for anyone in money market funds. Three bond ETFs deliver yields north of 6% through different mechanisms: iShares Broad USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (CBOE:USHY) leans on junk credit spreads, Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (NYSEARCA:CLOZ) taps mezzanine tranches of collateralized loan obligations, and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (CBOE:TLTW) manufactures income by selling calls against long-duration Treasuries.

Each fund reaches a similar yield through a different mechanism. The 10-year Treasury sits near 4.7%, close to the top of its 12-month range, and the 10-year minus 2-year spread has steepened to about half a percent. The extra yield each ETF pays above the risk-free baseline is compensation for a specific risk: credit, structural, or duration risk.

Why Yield Above 6% Requires a Deliberate Choice

Cash yields have compressed alongside the Fed’s cutting cycle. According to Goldman Sachs Asset Management, the base case calls for the Fed to reach a 3% to 3.25% policy rate by year-end 2026 under a soft-landing scenario, with a hard-landing path taking the funds rate as low as 1.5% to 1.75%. J.P. Morgan’s outlook expects 10-year Treasuries to settle between 4.00% and 4.50%, which frames the ceiling for pure-Treasury strategies without an income overlay.

The three ETFs below all clear the 6% bar, but the sources of return differ. The same 7% coupon means something different depending on whether it comes from a distressed corporate bond, a structured note, or a call premium.

USHY: The Straightforward Credit Play

The ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained Index is what USHY tracks, and it pays a distribution yield of roughly 6.9% with monthly payouts. Expenses run at 0.08%, leaving more of the coupon in shareholders’ hands.

The portfolio holds more than 500 individual positions spread across airlines, insurance, healthcare, telecom, and midstream energy. Top issuers include Asurion, Allied Universal, and American Airlines, and the fund carries a cash buffer of about 14% of net assets. USHY has returned about 2% year-to-date and roughly 6% over the past year, capturing both coupon income and modest spread tightening.

High-yield spreads have compressed near historic tights, which Vanguard’s outlook characterizes as offering “limited compensation for risks” if the AI-driven investment cycle disappoints. A recession scenario that widens spreads would hit USHY’s price harder than the coupon can offset. For an investor who wants junk credit exposure without picking individual issuers, this is the vehicle.

CLOZ: The Overlooked Structured Credit Option

BBB- and B-rated tranches of collateralized loan obligations are what CLOZ invests in, which are structured pools of senior secured leveraged loans. Because the underlying loans reset on floating-rate coupons, CLO tranches have lower duration than comparable fixed-rate high-yield bonds, and mezzanine tranches deliver spread income that has historically outpaced similarly rated corporate credit.

The expense ratio is 0.50%, higher than USHY, reflecting active management and specialty exposure. Net assets stood at roughly $668 million at the end of May. Year-to-date total return sits at about 4%, with a one-year figure near 6%.

As the Fed cuts, floating-rate coupons on CLO underlying loans will step down, but mezzanine tranches still capture the spread over the reference rate and are protected by the equity and lower-rated tranches beneath them. BBB and B CLO tranches have posted lower historical default rates than similarly rated corporate bonds. Liquidity in stressed markets can thin quickly, and the underlying loans are made to leveraged borrowers whose interest coverage compresses during downturns. CLOZ suits an investor who understands securitization mechanics and wants yield that does not travel with the same duration profile as a Treasury or investment-grade bond fund.

TLTW: Duration Plus a Premium Overlay

The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF is held by TLTW at roughly 100% of net assets, with out-of-the-money call options written against the position that track the Cboe TLT 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. The current options position shown in the fact sheet is an April 2026 TLT call at $89. Distribution yield runs near 11% with monthly payouts, and expenses are 0.35%.

Zero credit risk is carried by TLTW, though enormous duration risk accompanies it, since the fund holds the full price sensitivity of the 20-plus-year Treasury complex, and the fund has posted a year-to-date decline of about 1% even as the Fed has cut rates, because long yields have drifted higher. The one-year total return is roughly 3%, well below the distribution rate, meaning some of the payout has come from principal erosion. Shares trade around $21, off the 52-week high near $24.

The call overlay caps upside if long Treasury prices rally. TLTW works best for an investor who expects long yields to move sideways within a range and wants to be paid heavily for that view. A covered-call overlay caps upside relative to owning the underlying long-Treasury ETF outright, so the two vehicles express different views on long bonds.

Choosing Between the Three

Corporate credit risk is the domain of USHY, and it fits the investor who wants the cheapest, most liquid vehicle for broad junk exposure. Built for someone who wants yield that behaves differently from the rest of a bond portfolio, and who can tolerate a smaller, less traded fund with structured credit mechanics, is CLOZ.

For TLTW, the fit is an investor with a specific view on long-duration Treasuries, someone willing to trade upside for a double-digit distribution and prepared for principal drawdowns if long yields climb. Three yields above 6%, three different bets, each tied to a different macro path.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WDC Vol: 926,704
MU Vol: 4,631,862
AMAT Vol: 864,025
STX Vol: 409,466
CDNS Vol: 117,705

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
CNC Vol: 181,446
SMCI Vol: 7,324,138
ENPH Vol: 221,289
STZ Vol: 48,998