GM Sprinted Past Ford After Its $6 Billion Buyback. This Year The Hare Is Napping.

Photo of Trey Thoelcke
By Trey Thoelcke Published

Quick Read

  • GM surged 77% past Ford after its June 2024 buyback but now trails year-to-date, up just 3% versus Ford's 13%.

  • Ford matches SPY's 12% YTD gain, fueled by 430% year-over-year earnings growth while GM posted a 26% GAAP decline.

  • GM trades at 6x forward earnings but 90% institutional ownership leaves little room for new sponsorship versus Ford's 68%.

  • The most widely read finance newsletter on Substack isn't published by a bank, it's Doomberg, where 383,000+ readers get the energy and macro analysis the mainstream press misses. 24/7 Wall St. readers save 17% on their first year here.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
GM Sprinted Past Ford After Its $6 Billion Buyback. This Year The Hare Is Napping.

© 24/7 Wall St.

General Motors (NYSE: GM | GM Price Prediction) and Ford (NYSE: F) both raised full-year guidance this summer, yet the market is treating them very differently. Since GM’s board authorized a $6 billion buyback on June 11, 2024, the hare sprinted past the tortoise. In 2026, the hare is napping. Ford is quietly outrunning its rival year to date, and both are running against the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSEARCA: SPY).

The Sprint, the Trailing Year, and the Flip

GM’s original authorization was followed by more capital returns: a 25% dividend hike and another $6 billion buyback in February 2025, then a further $6 billion repurchase approved in January 2026. That drumbeat shrank the diluted share count to 893 million, 35% below Q2 2023. Ford has leaned instead on its 4.18% dividend yield and smaller buybacks.

Window GM Ford SPY
Since June 11, 2024 +77.07% +35.04% +42.93%
Trailing 1 Year +50.23% +30.66% +19.30%
Year to Date +3.41% +12.85% +12.54%

Why GM’s Lead Stopped Widening

GM’s Q2 earnings report looked strong on the surface. Adjusted EPS came in at $3.57 versus $3.18 expected, and management raised the full-year EBIT-adjusted range to $14.0 to $16.0 billion. But $2.28 billion in EV strategic realignment charges pressured GAAP results, and quarterly earnings growth registered −26.2% year over year. Ford’s direction is the opposite: quarterly earnings growth of +430.8% year over year, with Model E losses narrowing and Ford Pro paid subscriptions reaching roughly 1.6 million, up about 50% year over year. CEO Jim Farley described the business as “a more profitable, more disciplined, and generally different company.”

GM earnings explorer
F earnings explorer

What Wall Street Is Paying For

Analysts lean harder toward GM. The consensus price target is $100.04 for GM versus $15.78 for Ford. GM’s analyst rating split is seven Strong Buy, 15 Buy, four Hold, one Sell, and one Strong Sell. Ford’s is three Strong Buy, five Buy, 13 Hold, and one Sell. Forward P/E offers a similar frame: GM at 6x, Ford at 8x. Institutional ownership is 90.5% for GM versus 68.0% for Ford, which caps how much fresh sponsorship GM can pull in from here.

GM analyst ratings
F analyst ratings

The Takeaway

GM did what it promised on capital returns, and the buyback-window result reflects that discipline. Ford’s turnaround, however, is where the year-over-year deltas are widening fastest. For steadier cash conversion and Detroit’s biggest buyback engine, GM still fits. For exposure to operating leverage on a leaner cost base, with the Universal EV platform and Ford Energy still not yet reflected in the numbers, Ford is the more interesting high-variance bet. But don’t forget that the hare woke up once before.

 

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Photo of Trey Thoelcke
About the Author Trey Thoelcke →

Trey has been an editor and author at 24/7 Wall St. for more than a decade, where he has published thousands of articles analyzing corporate earnings, dividend stocks, short interest, insider buying, private equity, and market trends. His comprehensive coverage spans the full spectrum of financial markets, from blue-chip stalwarts to emerging growth companies.

Beyond 24/7 Wall St., Trey has created and edited financial content for Benzinga and AOL's BloggingStocks, contributing additional hundreds of articles to the investment community. He previously oversaw the 24/7 Climate Insights site, managing editorial operations and content strategy, and currently oversees and creates content for My Investing News.

Trey's editorial expertise extends across multiple publishing environments. He served as production editor at Dearborn Financial Publishing and development editor at Kaplan, where he helped shape financial education materials. Earlier in his career, he worked as a writer-producer at SVE. His freelance editing portfolio includes work for prestigious clients such as Sage Publications, Rand McNally, the Institute for Supply Management, the American Library Association, Eggplant Literary Productions, and Spiegel.

Outside of financial journalism, Trey writes fiction and has been an active member of the writing community for years, overseeing a long-running critique group and moderating workshop sessions at regional conventions. He lives with his family in an old house in the Midwest.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MRNA Vol: 54,225,066
EL Vol: 4,009,241
MRK Vol: 8,715,284
JKHY Vol: 251,748
NEM Vol: 1,841,487

Top Losing Stocks

CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
DELL Vol: 1,522,560
CRWD Vol: 2,212,866
HPE Vol: 3,534,786
AVGO Vol: 8,287,000