Taiwan Just Rebounded. Nvidia Didn’t. The Market Is Pricing a Discount on Jensen Huang

The market put a price on one man this morning, and if your retirement savings sit in an S&P 500 index fund, you paid part of it: Taiwan’s stock index jumped 4.9% and TSMC, the company that manufactures Nvidia’s processors, rose 4.7% in Taipei, while Nvidia, the company that designs them, was down 4.1% in early premarket trading, the Associated Press reported, as its board began an independent investigation into reports that Jensen Huang was the target of a foreign intelligence effort. The maker and the designer had each closed Friday about 22% below their October records. By Monday morning, one was rebounding and the other was still falling.

Take a retired couple, 67 and 64, with $2,000,000 in retirement savings: $1,400,000 in a rollover IRA ($700,000 in an S&P 500 index fund, $700,000 in Treasuries), $200,000 in a Roth IRA in the same stock fund, and $400,000 in a brokerage account ($240,000 in a total international stock fund, $104,008 in a money market fund, and 300 Nvidia shares bought the week of the June 2024 split at $121.79). Social Security pays them $5,100 a month, $61,200 a year, and they spend $120,000, so they draw $58,800 a year from savings. They think of themselves as index fund investors, and their Social Security checks, not the stock market, pay half of their bills. If that sounds like you, the numbers below are yours, and there are three moves to make in your retirement plan this week. None of them touches the index funds.

First, the reading and its limit. The gap between the two companies reads as a key-person discount: investors paying less for Nvidia because of a question about the founder who runs it, and nothing else. The limit is that one morning proves little. Taiwan’s rebound came with a government stabilization fund and new curbs on short selling, and the board’s statement says it has confidence in Huang, that he remains chief executive, and that it has no reason to believe national security or Nvidia secrets were compromised. Huang said he supports the investigation and will cooperate fully. Beijing called the spying claims a smear. Nobody, including the board, has said how long the inquiry will take or what it will find, and this story does not guess. What you can do is count.

Move one: count what your retirement savings really hold of both companies

Nvidia was 7.30% of the S&P 500 fund on November 4, according to State Street’s holdings for SPY, and other S&P 500 funds hold nearly the same weight. TSMC is the largest holding in Vanguard’s total international stock fund at 4.27% as of September 30, and it is in no S&P 500 or U.S. total-market fund at all. So the couple’s index funds hold both companies, in very different sizes.

The index funds alone put $65,700, about $65,000, of their retirement savings on Nvidia, more than they have in any other single company and more than most retirees would guess. The 300 shares they bought on the split push the total to $121,692, about six cents of every dollar they own. Fidelity’s rule of thumb is that "it may be worth reexamining any single position that accounts for 5% or more of your investments," counted across your full portfolio. On that rule, this couple is $21,692 over the line, and almost half of their Nvidia is inside funds they never chose to concentrate. If you own an S&P 500 fund, your own line is the same arithmetic: the fund balance times 7.30%, plus any shares you hold on the side.

What this morning’s gap costs them

On Friday’s values, Nvidia’s 4.1% premarket drop takes $4,989 from the couple: $2,694 through the index funds and $2,296 on the direct shares. TSMC’s 4.7% gain in Taipei adds $482 through the international fund, after Friday’s 6.3% bounce in the ADR added $648. Net, the morning’s two moves cost them about $4,508, and all of it traces back to the question about one executive.

A Thursday-size Nvidia day, when the stock fell 9.3%, costs them $11,267 at their current exposure. If Nvidia fell another 20% from Friday’s close, they would lose $24,338, and $13,140 of that would come through the index funds, under one cent on each dollar of their savings. That is the real size of the key-person question for an index investor: large enough to notice, small enough that the $700,000 of Treasuries in the IRA covers 11.9 years of their $58,800 annual draw without selling a share of anything, which carries them past the age when required minimum distributions begin at 73. On today’s balance, the IRA’s first required withdrawal at 73 would be $52,830, using the IRS divisor of 26.5, and the Treasuries cover that too without a stock sale.

Move two: the direct shares are the only Nvidia decision you control

The index funds will hold whatever weight the index gives Nvidia, and that is the point of owning them. The 300 shares are different. They are the couple’s own bet on one company, and they sit on a $19,455 gain in a taxable account.

Selling all 300 this year costs them less than they expect. Their taxable income without the sale is $63,540, after $44,590 of taxable Social Security, the $32,200 standard deduction, the $1,650 addition for a spouse over 65, and the $6,000 senior deduction. The $19,455 gain lands inside the 0% long-term capital gains bracket, which runs to $98,900 of taxable income on a joint return, so the gain itself is taxed at zero. What the sale does is push more of their Social Security into taxable income, from $44,590 to $52,020, and that costs $892 of federal tax. Their adjusted gross income rises to $130,275, far below the $218,000 line where Medicare premiums go up two years later, and below the $250,000 line for the 3.8% net investment income tax. After the sale, their Nvidia is $65,700, all through the index funds.

Selling 120 shares instead, $22,397, brings them to Fidelity’s line for $794 of extra tax, and leaves them with a stock they still have to watch. For a couple who want to be index investors, the cleaner answer is all 300. If your shares sit in an IRA instead of a brokerage account, the sale costs you nothing in tax at all.

Move three: leave the index funds alone, and rebalance only inside the IRA

Thursday’s 4.4% drop in the S&P 500 took $39,683 from the couple’s $900,000 in the stock fund, and Nvidia’s share of that was about $6,083. Nothing about this week argues for selling the fund: the portfolio sits at 59.8% stocks against a 60% target, $4,008 off, so no trade is needed.

If they do sell the 300 shares, stocks fall to 57.0%. The fix is $55,992 of Treasuries into the S&P 500 fund inside the IRA, where the trade costs $0 in tax. That puts $4,087 of Nvidia back through the fund, for a total of $69,787. That is the index’s weight, and the index will change it on its own as the price moves. The same rebalance in your brokerage account would add a taxable sale; do it in the IRA.

What to watch

Two dates matter more than this morning’s headlines. Nvidia reports quarterly results on November 17, and the board will report on its investigation when it is done. Both are facts the couple will read, and neither changes their retirement plan, because the plan no longer depends on one company or one man. Their Social Security, their Treasuries and their index funds carry the plan; the 300 shares were the only piece that ever depended on Jensen Huang.

The bottom line

Taiwan’s index rose 4.9% and TSMC 4.7% while Nvidia fell 4.1% before the open, which reads as the market pricing a key-person discount on Jensen Huang; one morning and a government rescue fund in Taipei are the limits of that reading. A couple with $2,000,000 in index funds holds $65,700 of Nvidia and $10,248 of TSMC without choosing either. Their 300 direct shares take them to $121,692, over Fidelity’s 5% line. Selling the shares costs $892 of federal tax because the gain sits in the 0% bracket. Rebalancing inside the IRA costs $0 and leaves them at the index weight. This morning’s gap cost them $4,508. Their Treasuries cover 11.9 years of withdrawals, and that number did not move.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.