ETF

These 3 Monthly Payers Can Turn $750,000 Into More Than $70,000 a Year Without Touching Principal

A 10-year Treasury won't get a $750,000 portfolio to $70,000 a year in income, but three monthly-paying ETFs with very different personalities just might, and the way they fit together is not obvious.

Published September 10, 2026, 6:05pm ET · 5 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

White eggs in green paper container with blurred money on a white background. Egg price increase concept.
© A.Kolos / Shutterstock.com

The $750,000 nest egg that needs to throw off more than $70,000 a year in income is a hard problem to solve in a market where the 10-year Treasury pays about 4.8%. Government paper caps out well short of that goal. Three monthly-distribution equity income ETFs, blended together, can close the gap: the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ:JEPQ), the NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF (BATS:SPYI), and the Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (NYSEARCA:DIVO).

Each writes call options on U.S. large caps, and each pays every month (we rounded up seven of our favorite monthly-payer names in a free report you can grab here). What separates them is where the yield comes from, what upside gets sacrificed, and how the IRS treats the distribution. Own all three in the right mix and the blended yield clears the target while the underlying equity portfolios continue to compound.

Why blend rather than pick one? A single-fund approach forces a choice between headline yield and capital appreciation. JEPQ and SPYI push distribution rates into double-digit territory but cap participation on rallies. DIVO surrenders income for growth. Combining them produces a portfolio yield in the roughly 9% to 10% range while retaining meaningful equity upside.

JEPQ Is the Yield Anchor for the Blend

[stock_chart ticker=”JEPQ”]

JEPQ carries the highest headline distribution of the three by a wide margin. Its annualized forward distribution of $8.19 per share against a recent price near $60 pushes the distribution rate deep into double digits.

The mechanism is layered. JPMorgan runs a lower-volatility slice of the Nasdaq-100 as the equity book, then adds equity-linked notes that write out-of-the-money calls on the index. Those notes generate the option premium funding the monthly payout. As of June 30, 2026, the largest positions read like a mega-cap tech roster: NVIDIA at 6.6%, Apple at 5.7%, Micron at 5.5%, Alphabet at 5.0%, and Microsoft at 3.8%. The ELN sleeve appears as structured notes from BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Royal Bank of Canada, and Toronto-Dominion, each holding roughly 1% of assets.

Two things to understand before leaning heavily on it. This is a Nasdaq-100 vehicle, so when mega-cap tech corrects, JEPQ corrects with it, and the premium income only cushions so much. Distributions are also variable. Recent monthly checks have ranged from roughly $0.47 to $0.70, tracking the volatility environment. The offset is that JEPQ still delivered a total return near 20% over the past year on top of the income.

SPYI Manages the Tax Bill on Every Distribution

[stock_chart ticker=”SPYI”]

SPYI does something JEPQ does not. NEOS runs a full S&P 500 equity book and overlays a data-driven SPX index-options strategy. Because SPX options qualify for Section 1256 treatment, gains are taxed 60% long-term and 40% short-term regardless of holding period, and NEOS routinely classifies a portion of distributions as return of capital, which defers tax rather than triggering it in the current year.

For a taxable brokerage account, that after-tax advantage meaningfully closes the gap with a slightly higher-yielding but ordinary-income vehicle. The distribution stays competitive: an annualized forward payout of roughly $6.51 per share against a price near $54, with monthly checks running consistently in the $0.51 to $0.54 range over the past year.

The equity book mirrors the S&P 500’s top weights, with Apple at 6.6%, Microsoft at 4.3%, Amazon at 3.6%, Alphabet’s two share classes combined near 5.9%, and Broadcom at 2.8%. That delivers S&P-like sector diversification rather than JEPQ’s tech concentration, and price performance has kept pace: up roughly 11% year-to-date and 17% over one year. The tradeoff mirrors JEPQ’s. Index-call writing caps participation in sharp upside moves. But the tax structure earns SPYI a distinct role in the blend for anyone holding these outside an IRA.

DIVO Is the Growth Sleeve Income Investors Overlook

[stock_chart ticker=”DIVO”]

DIVO is the fund most income hunters skip because the headline yield disappoints. Its annualized forward distribution of $2.34 per share against a price near $48 works out to a mid-single-digit yield, roughly what a bank preferred pays.

That’s the point. Capital Wealth Planning runs DIVO as a concentrated book of high-quality dividend payers, then writes covered calls tactically on individual names rather than blanketing the whole portfolio with an index overlay. The holdings look like a dividend-growth manager’s model: Caterpillar at 7.0%, Apple at 5.1%, Microsoft at 4.9%, JPMorgan at 4.9%, Goldman Sachs at 4.6%, American Express at 4.5%, TJX at 4.4%, and Amgen at 4.2%. Only a fraction of the book is called at any given time, evidenced by the small negative derivative positions in CAT and JPM call options visible in the June holdings.

Because most of the equity book runs uncapped, DIVO participates in rallies far more than JEPQ or SPYI. Over the last decade, the fund has returned roughly 223%, a total-return profile closer to the broad market than to a pure income sleeve. It also occasionally pays a large year-end special distribution, as it did with a $0.95 payment in December 2025, which is why trailing 12-month income of $3.00 exceeds the smoother forward run rate. Less income today, more compounding tomorrow. In a blended portfolio, DIVO is the growth engine keeping principal intact and rising.

How the Blend Clears $70,000 Without Draining Principal

Weighted roughly one-third to each fund, JEPQ’s double-digit distribution and SPYI’s tax-advantaged payout do the heavy lifting, while DIVO’s smaller check is offset by the highest expected capital appreciation of the three. A blended distribution rate in the 9% to 10% zone clears the $70,000 income bar with room to spare on $750,000, and because all three funds hold real equity portfolios rather than eroding NAV to fund payouts, principal has historically grown alongside the checks. Year-to-date price gains illustrate the point. JEPQ is up roughly 12%, SPYI 11%, and DIVO 11%.

Which Investor Should Overweight Which Fund

Tilt toward JEPQ if maximizing current cash flow is the primary goal and you can stomach concentrated Nasdaq exposure and variable monthly checks. Lean into SPYI if the account is taxable and after-tax income matters as much as gross yield. Favor DIVO if you are younger, still building the portfolio, or want the total-return profile to resemble the S&P more than a covered-call sleeve. The case for owning all three, rather than any single fund, is that the weaknesses cancel out. JEPQ’s tech risk, SPYI’s capped rally participation, and DIVO’s lower headline yield each become a smaller share of the whole, and the $70,000 income target holds up in a wider range of market environments than any one fund could support alone.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →