ETF

Forget IDV: Vanguard’s VYMI Returned 29% in a Year While Charging Just 0.07%

IDV has delivered income investors a reliable yield for years, but a rival international dividend ETF with a fraction of the fees quietly outpaced it over the last 12 months, and the gap raises real questions about what concentration and…

Published September 16, 2026, 6:15pm ET · 3 min read

The ETF Examiner desk. Editor: Ryne Mauck.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Three progressively taller stacks of silver coins are arranged on a wooden surface, overlaid with a translucent blue digital grid of a world map. Various white currency symbols, including the dollar, euro, pound, yen, and ruble, are visible alongside an upward-pointing white arrow and faint digital numbers, suggesting financial growth and global markets. A bright light source emanates from behind the coins, casting a warm glow.
This image symbolizes the growth and international nature of investments, reflecting the upward trends seen in global markets and promising ETF returns. Various currency symbols underscore the diverse global financial landscape. © RORONOR / Shutterstock.com

If you own the iShares International Select Dividend ETF (CBOE:IDV), the pitch was straightforward: concentrated exposure to roughly 100 of the highest-yielding developed-market dividend payers outside the U.S., wrapped in a familiar iShares ticker. That formula still delivers a rich income stream, and IDV holders have watched the fund benefit from a strong year for European and Asia-Pacific dividend names. But the fund carries a cost structure and a concentration profile that a much cheaper, broader Vanguard alternative quietly beats on total return, and the gap is wide enough that longtime IDV owners should look at what they are actually paying for.

Why IDV Attracted Income Investors in the First Place

IDV tracks the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend Index and concentrates its book in about 100 established payers in the U.K., Australia, France, Italy, and Spain, with a heavy tilt toward financials and utilities. That concentration is intentional: by screening for the highest yielders, IDV produced a trailing 12-month distribution of $2.28 per share against a current price of $44.26, a trailing yield near 5.1%. For income-first investors, that headline number is why the fund sits in the portfolio.

Where IDV Quietly Costs You Money

The problem is the expense ratio. IDV charges 0.50% per year, verified against the fund’s August 31, 2026 prospectus. On a $50,000 position, that is $250 in fund fees every year, whether the fund rises or falls. Combined with a concentrated roster and heavy sector tilts, IDV’s index construction has produced a one-year total return of 25.72%, respectable in absolute terms, but trailing a broader competitor built for the same job.

Vanguard’s International High-Yield Alternative

The swap candidate is the Vanguard International High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF (NASDAQ:VYMI), the international sibling of Vanguard’s well-known domestic high-yield fund. VYMI charges 0.07%, verified from Vanguard’s June 2026 fact sheet. That is a 43 basis point annual fee gap in VYMI’s favor, or roughly $215 saved per year on a $50,000 position, compounding for as long as the money stays invested.

Fee savings are only the starting point of the case. VYMI spreads capital across a far broader roster of dividend payers rather than screening down to only the top 100 yielders. Over the last year, that construction delivered a total return of 29.2%, ahead of IDV by several percentage points while sitting on $20 billion in net assets, an AUM base that keeps trading spreads tight and tracking clean.

Yield Tradeoff Worth Naming

IDV holders should weigh a real tradeoff here. VYMI’s trailing yield sits near 3.4%, backed by $3.60 in trailing 12-month distributions against a $104.79 share price. IDV pays more current income. If your only measure is the yield line, IDV wins that box. What VYMI wins on is total return, which is what actually funds withdrawals and grows the portfolio. Higher-yield screens tend to overweight financially stressed payers and slow-growth utilities, and the last 12 months are a live example: IDV’s richer distribution did not translate into a richer total return.

How to Approach the Switch

In a tax-advantaged account (IRA, 401k rollover, Roth), the swap is mechanical. Sell IDV, buy VYMI, no tax consequence. In a taxable account, first check your cost basis. If you bought IDV meaningfully below $44.26, a full swap triggers a capital gain, and the fee savings may take years to overcome the tax bill. A common middle path is to stop reinvesting IDV distributions and redirect new contributions to VYMI, letting the position shift over time without a taxable event.

What This Means for the Position

IDV works as designed. It is simply a narrow, more expensive vehicle, in a category where a broader, cheaper option has produced better total returns while doing the same job of paying international dividends. If you own IDV for the yield line specifically and accept concentration risk, staying put is defensible. If you own it as your core international income sleeve, VYMI’s 0.07% fee, broader roster, and stronger one-year total return make it the more efficient way to hold the same exposure.

Contact [email protected] for any questions or corrections.

Ryne Mauck

Ryne Mauck is an investment writer covering exchange-traded funds, retirement planning, and portfolio strategy. Through his work at 24/7 Wall St. and other investment platforms, including Seeking Alpha, he aims to provide clear, research-driven insights that help investors make more informed decisions while maintaining a long-term approach to investing.

Ryne holds a B.Sc. in Finance and an M.A. in Political Science. He is a formerly registered Municipal Advisor Representative and has passed the Series 50, Series 63, and Series 65 exams. His articles are not intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, financial advice.

All articles →